Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the update!
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:41:01PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've uploaded new 1.19.0.2-1 version to mentors.d.o.
> I've added manpages, fixed copyright info, fixed alternatives
> and enabled auto-tests. Could you please review it?
Buil
Hello,
I've uploaded new 1.19.0.2-1 version to mentors.d.o.
I've added manpages, fixed copyright info, fixed alternatives
and enabled auto-tests. Could you please review it?
сб, 2 июн. 2018 г. в 7:08, Lumin :
>
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:24:07AM +, Lumin wrote:
> > Please fix the aforementi
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:24:07AM +, Lumin wrote:
> Please fix the aforementioned problems. Hopefully we'll have the last
> round of check next time. Thank you for working on this.
>
> [1]
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/odp/1.19.0.1-1/buildlog
Forgot to check the
Forgot to check the copyright ... The copyright looks incomplete. A
simple search on the source tree would reveal many non-Linaro copyright
holders:
grep -ri copyright | grep -vi linaro | grep -i copyright
The package will be rejected by ftp-master if we don't fix the
copyright.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:40:48PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > 1. README.Debian
> >"Library packages should contain libodp-linux.so.FOO"
> >It should be "libodp-linux.so.SOVER", which is more precise.
>
> Hmm. I have checked buster package lists. Only blas/lapack packages
> u
Hello,
Thank for your review.
2018-05-25 9:31 GMT+03:00 Lumin :
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n.
>
> Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a
> different sour
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n.
Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a
different source.
> 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov :
> > I will make
Hello,
I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n.
2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov :
> I will make my next upload use alternatives, thank you.
This upload uses alternatives to select ODP library to be used.
>> * move all the executables to /usr/bin. Their name start
Hello,
2018-05-05 16:47 GMT+03:00 Lumin :
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:58:26PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev
>> > seems not exist.
>>
>> Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are virtual package,
>> provided
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:58:26PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev
> > seems not exist.
>
> Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are virtual package,
> provided by different implementations of ODP API. We are p
Hi Dimitry,
I'm keeping an eye on the list and these bugs. I know that
your package needs to be checked, but these days I'm a
little busy dealing with real life work so that I postponed
reviewing packages. I'll review and give you feedbacks in
this weekend.
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 22:21 Dmitry Ere
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #896970
Hi Lumin,
I've updated ODP package on mentors.d.n, according to most of your
comments. Could you please review it?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'tes
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #896970
For the reference I've uploaded a preview of ODP-DPDK 1.19.0.0 package
to mentors.d.n. It features library and -dev packages, which provide
libodp-linux119 and libodp-linux-dev packages.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
AP
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #896970
Hi Lumin,
I have uploaded next iteration of ODP package to mentors.d.n. It fixes
all issues you have pointed out, except issues 5, 6, 10, 11.
I'd like your advice wrt points 5 and 10 (we would like to keep virtual
packages in place).
For p
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #896970
> 1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev
Added.
> 2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g.
>
> W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic
I will try to. Privacy breaches come from generated documentation.
> 3. debhelper compat leve
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for this package. Here are some problems found in your package:
1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev
2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g.
W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic
3. debhelper compat level and the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odp"
* Package name: odp
Version : 1.19.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Linaro / ODP community
* URL : https://www.opendataplane.org/
* License : [fill in]
Section
17 matches
Mail list logo
