As recently as November 2004, I was seeing serious lockups and dataloss
with BDB backends, due to upstream bugs in the BDB integration, and all
our LDAP setups ended up using LDBM due to reliability concerns.
These BDB reliability concerns are tracked in Bug #190165
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 309798 important
Bug#309798: smbclient eats all memory and cpu with a simple ls
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 309689 309798
Bug#309689: Infite loop while reading directory listings.
Bug#309798: smbclient eats all memory and cpu with a s
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:48:12AM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached to this mail a patch which fixes a security problem in gdb.
>
> I tested the patch and it works. Patch comes from the current snapshot
> of gdb, I backported it.
>
> Bug #308624
There are at least two other pa
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: serious
Archive date: Thu May 19 19:00:01 UTC 2005
Upgrade date: Sat May 21 04:17:36 CEST 2005
uname -a: Linux signy 2.4.16 #1 Sun Dec 16 16:38:44 CET 2001 mips unknown
Method: online ftp, using apt-get
Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb ftp://192.168.114.
The only reason I suggested an epoch is that there is supposed to be a
freeze on, and this is a fairly destabilizing API change at a
relatively late date. But if that isn't a problem, then I'll update
libhtml-mason to work correctly with the new mp2 and NMU it.
-=Eric
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.0149 +0200]:
> So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh,
> fluxbox, things are looking bad.
So apart from
test -d /etc/X11/fluxbox && rm -rf /etc/X11/fluxbox
in postrm, which could potentially delete data insta
[ported to -devel from -release, -release on Bcc]
In the 0.9.11-1 changelog:
- Removed diverts (Closes: Bug#263512)
So the diversion here are leftovers which weren't deleted. Oh oh,
fluxbox, things are looking bad.
Thanks Steve for keeping a clear head when mine was in the clouds.
So the
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21. +0200]:
> Right, so, please upload a fixed version of 0.9.11 to
> testing-proposed-updates.
0.9.12-1 really *is* fixed. It uses diversions:
cirrus:..fluxbox-0.9.12/debian> apt-get install fluxbox blackbox -t unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 20 May 2005 12:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> c) Provide your hack only as a "tweak"
> > that's the current situation I think, no?
> No. Your hack replaces the file, ignori
Le vendredi 20 mai 2005 à 23:40 +0200, Yann Dirson a écrit :
> Hi Bruno,
>
> As I mentionned yesterday on IRC, that patch seems ro refer to a
> pre-6.5.2 change, and only applies when reversed. Looking at cvsweb,
> it really looks like that change was applied before the 6.5.2
> release. Furtherm
Package: picasm
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Multiple buffer overflows in picasm's code for generating error messages
have been found that can be exploited through crafted source code with
overly long preprocessor directives. For full details please see this
adv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308624 + patch
Bug#308624: gdb: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 17:47:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309519: fixed in murasaki 0.8.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 309495 patch
thanks
Well, here is a patch for the immediate issue. I was unable to duplicate
the problem of the original reporter exactly; it looked to me like the
proxy configuration was always removed on purge. However, it wasn't
removed on reconfigure or on reinstall. This patch correct
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:40:47PM +0200, dwitch wrote:
> As I mentionned yesterday on IRC, that patch seems ro refer to a
> pre-6.5.2 change, and only applies when reversed. Looking at cvsweb,
> it really looks like that change was applied before the 6.5.2
> release. Furthermore, once applied, i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 309495 patch
Bug#309495: anon-proxy: fails to clean /etc/environment on uninstall, debconf
change
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi Bruno,
As I mentionned yesterday on IRC, that patch seems ro refer to a
pre-6.5.2 change, and only applies when reversed. Looking at cvsweb,
it really looks like that change was applied before the 6.5.2
release. Furthermore, once applied, it does not correct the problem
(at least in the "draw
Hi martin!
You wrote:
> This has been fixed in 0.9.12-1. We are trying to decide whether
> a backport to 0.9.11 is necessary for sarge, or whether we can
> release 0.9.12.
I'm sorry, but it's not fixed in 0.9.12-1. blackbox 0.70.0-4 and
fluxbox 0.9.12-1 still both contain bsetroot binary and man
Hi Steve!
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050519 13:34]:
[ tuxracer in sarge ]
> I'm going to go ahead and push the tuxracer dummy packages into sarge, since
> AIUI this is still your preference as the maintainer.
Yes, that was my preference. Thank you very much!
Yours sincerely,
Alexa
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.55+cvs20050503-4
Severity: grave
In Portuguese
Não foi possível rodar /usr/sbin/synaptic como usuário root:
Processo filho terminado com estado 11
Translating (freely)
It was not possible to run /usr/sbin/synaptic as root: child process
finished with state 11
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309958 - fixed
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Tags were: sarge confirmed fixed
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Tags removed: fi
This has been fixed in 0.9.12-1. We are trying to decide whether
a backport to 0.9.11 is necessary for sarge, or whether we can
release 0.9.12.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308052 + fixed confirmed sarge
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
There were no tags set.
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Tags adde
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309958 + fixed confirmed sarge
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Tags were: sarge confirmed fixed
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
severity 308052 serious
merge 308052 309958
thanks
> blackbox and fluxbox both contain /usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.1.gz, but
> the packages do not conflict:
Please do not file multiple bugs.
We are investigating this.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308052 serious
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 308052 309958
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-9-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 2.6.11-2
Severity: grave
while booting the message "hdb: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears
confused (ireason = 0x01)" repeats several times and the system hangs
for some seconds. After booting and ru
Package: fluxbox
Severity: serious
blackbox and fluxbox both contain /usr/share/man/man1/bsetroot.1.gz, but
the packages do not conflict:
Unpacking fluxbox (from .../fluxbox_0.9.12-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fluxbox_0.9.12-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to over
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 268924 grave
Bug#268924: lxdoom-x11: won't start, complains of being 'Unable to find
supported visual settings'
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: osgcal
Followup-For: Bug #309201
I've added a clean command on clean target, also added the proper entry on
changelog. I'm not sure if this is the right-thing since I'm not that familiar
with the library, but it seems to work/build both on my sid system and
pbuilder' sarge chroot. Hope t
Package: kdebindings
Severity: serious
Version: 3.3.2-1
>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link i386-linux-g++
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500
-D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wch
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next log. Hope it is useful. I've put your debug log into rules and
> rules.in. The commonstuff_update I've removed only from rules.in. I
> firstly executed the clean target and after it ended the binary
> target.
Perfect, thanks. So, it doesn't loop an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 283740 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#283740: nant: resgen task looks for monoresgen.exe under temporary directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 300416 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#300416: nant: FTBFS: stops idling aft
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # 6.5.3 is not scheduled to enter sarge
> reopen 309838
Bug#309838: gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 309838 + sarge
Bug#
reopen 303300
tags = security, woody
thanks
I find no traces on http://www.nl.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody.
Btw. http://lwn.net/Articles/136284/ also talks about CAN-2005-1260,
but there is no info yet. Please check how they relate.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 303300
Bug#303300: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags = security, woody
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:05:53PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Since I don't have access to alpha desktop it would be quite hard to debug
> the problem.
I doubt this is relevant for the bug, but Valgrind shows several errors in
the memory handling. For instance, asc allocates memory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301459 serious
Bug#301459: gnome-menus: conflict with kdelibs-data
Severity set to `serious'.
> tag 301459 expermental
Unknown tag/s: expermental.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upst
Actually:
if [ -e /dev/.udevdb/ ]; then
if [ ! -e /dev/md/0 -a ! -e /dev/md0 ]; then
cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAKEDEV md
fi
fi
vorlon: I have been pointed at #294404: testing for presence of
/dev/.static/dev is broken, and there are probably good reasons to not
move the i
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:44:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> If you're positive, officially you're requested to file a bug on
> ftp.debian.org pseudopackage asking for its removal, but I can take it
> on from you if you explicitely say you've decided you want it to be
> removed. For
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309746 - security
Bug#309746: libpam-cracklib: passwd program segfaults when pam_cracklib.so used
Tags were: patch security
Tags removed: security
>
End of message, stopping pro
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 10:47:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307497: fixed in lme4 0.95.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 309746 cracklib-runtime
tags 309746 + patch
thanks
I found this problem is because word database is corrupted when
it was built with LANG=sk_SK.
I suspect other latin languages are affected by this bug.
Solution is to run each commands with LC_ALL=C in
/usr/sbin/crack_mkdict.
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Baker wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> Relevant snippet of the build log [1]:
>>
>> ./RunTest: line 111: 25459 Bus error
>> ./pcretest -i $testdata/testinput2 testtry
>> make[1]: *** [runtest] Error 1
>>
>>
>>
> I can't reproduce this. I've logge
On 19.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> Could you try to remove "commonstuff_update" from the double-colon
> rule and tell us if it loops again (and if so, attach the log file
> with the debug snippets)? Normally, removing it from rules.in only
> should be sufficient since aft
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:13:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Here's the (not so useful) backtrace:
[...]
Thanks Steve.
Since I don't have access to alpha desktop it would be quite hard to debug
the problem.
One more question. Does it segfault with `asc -q` switch?
regards
fEnIo
--
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 10:32:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309894: fixed in libapreq2-perl 2.05-dev-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 309746 cracklib-runtime
Bug#309746: libpam-cracklib: passwd program segfaults when pam_cracklib.so used
Bug reassigned from package `libpam-cracklib' to `cracklib-runtime'.
> tags 309746 + patch
Bug#309746: libpam-cracklib: passwd program segf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 309914 normal
Bug#309914: 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86' become no-op on upgrade from
Woody
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 14:34:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libsdl-erlang has been removed from sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|
|>Steve Langasek wrote:
|>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|>|
|>|>| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before
|>doing
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:18:32PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:43:16PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > severity 294413 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:57:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this pac
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks functionality on upgrade
Following upgrade from Woody, 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86'
silently becomes a no-op because no /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum
file exists. This causes an unexpected
severity 309798 important
merge 309689 309798
thanks
Quoting Ludovic Drolez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi !
>
> Here is the l10 dump.
>
> I think that the bug is triggered by a directory. I'm trying to find which
> one.
One with more than XX entries, very probably.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:43:16PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> severity 294413 serious
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:57:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this package should really be removed from debian.
> >
> > - It is in italian, so it is absolu
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:48:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> You did not declare and build dependency on python at all.
> I suggest you read the python policy in
> /usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.txt.gz
Thanks for reporting this!
I'm adding a build-dependency on python-dev, however I prefe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 309534 + help experimental
Bug#309534: libdebtags1: FTBFS: Missing build depedency.
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: help, experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing
Hi,
I confirmed this bug, and ldconfig doesn't solve for me.
Whenever I enter password in dictionary, for example "dictionary",
segmentation fault happens soon after "(index fread failed): Success".
# passwd kmuto
New UNIX password: dictionary
(index fread failed): Success
Segmentation fault
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I checkouted CVS from upstream site and tried to get diff about this
security problem.
CHANGES said:
0.9.17-rc1 (May 12, 2005)
- removed the use of temp files for handling imports with dynamic
compilation. This removes a whole slew of issue
Hi!
Roman Kreisel [2005-05-20 11:03 +0200]:
> I haven't investigated this very much, maybe this will be fixed with the new
> hal-package, but right now (even with updated pmount), pmount-hal still
> mounts devices with "-o sync".
>
> so... we all like screenshots, don't we? Here it comes:
>
>
What is the justification for assigning this bug report a severity level
of "grave"? Clearly the program isn't unusable.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 309883 normal
thanks
AFAIK the main subject of mozilla-firefox is to browse Web, isn't
print-out.
Of course problem should be fixed in the future, but I don't think it is
release critical.
To fix a problem, you need to provide more detail information, such as
where problematic web site i
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 06:34:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309843: fixed in libedit 2.9.cvs.20050518-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 298054 + fixed
Bug#298054: ssmtp mangles messages in transit
Tags were: fixed woody security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 294413 serious
Bug#294413: useless package
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 309883 normal
Bug#309883: mozilla-firefox: Moziall-firefox fails to print via cups, possible
due to incorrect PostScript
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>Package: desktop-profiles
>>Version: 1.4.5
>>Severity: serious
>>Justification: Policy 10.7.4
>>
>>The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 309894 grave
Bug#309894: libapache2-request-perl: Doesn't work with modperl2 version in sid
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 309894 + sid
Bug#309894: libapache2-request-perl: Doesn't work with modperl2 version in sid
There were no tags set.
Tag
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:16:11AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> bug 292337 is fixed, and there is no RC bug pending for doc++.
> Is there any reason you want to remove doc++ now?
I don't think it's reasonable to try to remove doc++ from sarge now,
especially when the current bugs have been fixed
Hi,
Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2005 09:54 schrieb Paul van der Vlis:
> 1. I have not seen a security announcement about this bug, and there is
> securtity support in Sarge now. Or do I miss something?
That's because the fix for that went in the normal way before the freeze.
> 2. I have not seen this bu
Robo Trebula wrote:
>>Unpacking this tarball to my system does not let me reproduce the bug.
>>
>>Can you try to get a backtrace of this bug by running 'gdb passwd' as root,
>>typing 'run test' to change the password of user 'test', and then sending
>>the output of 'bt' when it crashes?
>
>
> New
> Unpacking this tarball to my system does not let me reproduce the bug.
>
> Can you try to get a backtrace of this bug by running 'gdb passwd' as root,
> typing 'run test' to change the password of user 'test', and then sending
> the output of 'bt' when it crashes?
New interesting observations -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 305216 - wontfix
Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
I wrote:
> 1. I have not seen a security announcement about this bug, and there
> is securtity support in Sarge now. Or do I miss something?
>
> 2. I have not seen this bug in the bug-tracking system.
I am sorry.
The bug was fixed before there was security support for Sarge...
With regards,
Pau
I haven't investigated this very much, maybe this will be fixed with the new
hal-package, but right now (even with updated pmount), pmount-hal still
mounts devices with "-o sync".
so... we all like screenshots, don't we? Here it comes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pumount /media/usb_roman/
[EMAIL PROTE
Let your child grow with the best software...
http://mvjqw.5crkqmngkxnck6n.quotajquot9.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 11:00:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnupg 1.4 going to flow into sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Package: desktop-profiles
> Version: 1.4.5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.7.4
>
> The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by the package gconf2.
That file is left alone by default on installation of desktop-profiles.
The
reassign 309733 libldap2
severity 309733 important
reopen 309733
thanks
Ladislav,
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Ladislav Dobias wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:12:28AM +0200, Ladislav Dobias wrote:
> > > Exit cannot be started, it sa
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Robo Trebula wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:00:13PM +0200, Robo Trebula wrote:
> >>Steve Langasek wrote:
> >>>Could you please send us a list of the contents of the /var/cache/cracklib/
> >>>directory on your system?
> >>Su
Hello
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:30:02AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:48:11PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > severity 305216 serious
> > Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade
> > Severity set to `serious'.
>
> Why is this bug serious? I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 309733 libldap2
Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7
Bug reassigned from package `exim' to `libldap2'.
> severity 309733 important
Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7
Severity set to `important'.
> reopen 309733
Bug#30973
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > Thanks a lot. While you're at it, did you run "make check" in the
> libdbi-drivers
> > directory? This should already give a clue as to whether things work or
> not.
>
> Well, I don't think this would reveal anything in this case, but yes it
> is
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On sone machine firefox fails to print via CUPS without xprint installed.
I am able to print to file. I can view PS file using gv, but unable to
print it untill I process it through ps2ps. Newly gegn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>
>
>>I'll upload a new version (the only markable difference would be the
>>dependency on libmysqlclient12) which you can test in the weekend ;-)
>>
>
>
> Thanks a lot. While
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> forwarded 309798 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2729
Bug#309798: smbclient eats all memory and cpu with a simple ls
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
ht
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
> |
> |>| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before
> doing so,
> |>| would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see
I managed to reproduce this bug, unfortunately.
And, even more unfortunately, it seems different from #302771 and it
is NOT fixed by 3.0.14a-2...
Attached is a level 10 debug output from a session with the bug. The
behaviour is what Ludovic described. "ls" seems to "hang" and the CPU
and memory i
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:09:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sjoerd,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:20:13AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > Just uploaded hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates. This removes
> > the sync option from the default setup and adds a warning to the example
Hi !
Here is the l10 dump.
I think that the bug is triggered by a directory. I'm trying to find which one.
$ dpkg -l smbclient
ii smbclient 3.0.14a-1 a LanManager-like simple client for Unix
Cheers,
Ludo.
--
www.palmopensource.com - The PalmOS open source portal
www.drolez.com
Debian Bug Tracking System schreef:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #309749: openoffice.org: Heap overflow,
> which was filed against the openoffice.org package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> Their
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The file /etc/gconf2/path is a conffile owned by the package gconf2.
Postinst of desktop-profiles offers through debconf to mess with that
file. That is a violation of Debian Policy section 10.7.4.
I see no
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I'll upload a new version (the only markable difference would be the
> dependency on libmysqlclient12) which you can test in the weekend ;-)
>
Thanks a lot. While you're at it, did you run "make check" in the libdbi-drivers
directory? This should
Hi Ola,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:48:11PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > severity 305216 serious
> Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade
> Severity set to `serious'.
Why is this bug serious? It seems that the bug only affects 2.4.29 kernels
-- is that correct?
Thanks,
--
Steve
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> It's entirely possible that simply doing a proper rebuild of the i386
> binaries against libmysqlclient12 will also fix whatever problem you're
> experiencing...
>
Granted.
>
> It would be helpful if you would try to rebuild the current sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>
>
>
>>It's entirely possible that simply doing a proper rebuild of the i386
>>binaries against libmysqlclient12 will also fix whatever problem you're
>>experiencing...
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package kmatplot
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kmatplot
> severity 303477 serious
Bug#303477: kmatplot: Do not release with sarge...
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303477 serious
Bug#303477: kmatplot: Do not release with sarge...
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:57:03AM +0200, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> > And, indeed libdbd-mysql already links against libmysqlclient14 in sarge and
> > sid. So then, why are you suggesting a rebuild as a solution to this bug?
> I may not be sufficiently familiar with Debian packaging and such. When
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > libdbd-mysql, and everything works smoothly. I was under the layman's
> > impression that if you build against libmysqlclient12-dev and run
> > libmysqlclient14 you may get into trouble, but I may be wrong here.
>
> I don't think that's a problem
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
