> One change that *would* mitigate the problems for other distributors
> (and Debian) is, since freetype 2.2 will already include a linker
> script, to add symbol versions to that linker script. [...]
According to this excellent document (everybody involved into this
discussion should read it!)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 349868 0.10.2-2.1
Bug#349868: babel: errors in configure
Bug marked as found in version 0.10.2-2.1.
> severity 349868 serious
Bug#349868: babel: errors in configure
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
found 349868 0.10.2-2.1
severity 349868 serious
thanks
Hi,
I'm bumping the severity on this to RC because currently babel FTBFS'es on
all arches due to errors in configure script. See the latest buildd logs
at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=babel for details.
Best regards,
Jur
Hi,
I've recently investigated the FTBFS on sparc (where it fails even before
getting to the testing stage [0]), and found that the build failure was
caused by lack of a call to gst_init() in the BOOT section of xs/Gst.xs.
Without it the code segfaults with the following backtrace:
#0 0x7022
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:17:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350212: fixed in gnubg 0.14.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350212 pending
Bug#350212: gnubg: ftbfs [sparc] automake-1.6: command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:23:25PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libtunepimp
> Version: 0.3.0-9.1
> Severity: serious
> From my pbuilder build log:
> ...
> ar cru .libs/libtunepimp.a tunepimp.o filecache.o filelookup.o analyzer.o
> dirsearch.o id3_meta.o metadata.o mp3_trm.o flac_trm
Package: kaffeine
Version: 0.7.1-1.3+b1
Severity: serious
While playing some movies (in example dvix) via kaffeine with xine
engine, the kaffeine sort of hangs after rewinding movie a bit around,
the movie continiue to play, user can move even the window around,
although kaffeine UI do not accept
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 349020 -1
Bug#349020: RM: gmime -- RoM; obsolete; no rev-deps
Bug 349020 cloned as bug 350221.
> reopen -1
Bug#350221: RM: gmime -- RoM; obsolete; no rev-deps
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign -1 gmime1
Bug#350221: RM: gmime -- Ro
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:19:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:38:25PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > Package: kde-style-lipstik
> > Version: 2.1-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> > kde-style-lipstik faild to build on a sparc
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:38:25PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: kde-style-lipstik
> Version: 2.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> kde-style-lipstik faild to build on a sparc buildd and an ia64 buildd.
> Usling current debian libtool has been sugjested
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:48:08AM +0100, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
> > That wouldn't be better. That's policy demand, and mentioned bug is the
> > reason I didn't upload new version of fuse yet, cause I would violate
> > policy doing it.
>
> Hello Bartosz,
>
> Thanks for the explanation, I hadn't
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gnubg
> Version: 0.14.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> gnubg failed to build on a sparc buildd and an ia64 buildd.
Yeah, I noticed that and just haven't had a chance to do another upload.
Hopefully tonight,
That bug reported against r-cran-nlme is arguably the same bug as
Bug#349637: r-base-core: /usr/lib to /usr/share move breaks \
R modules installation and removal
where it was triggered by r-cran-matrix, but reported against r-base-core.
The problem lies somewhere betwe
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [2006-01-27 15:28:00+0100]
> Recai Oktaş wrote:
> > + Backport r1636 from upstream's Subversion repository:
> > "Added IP address to log file"
>
> Why is r1636 necessary? This seems like a new feature (better logging
> in case of an attack), but doesn't seem to f
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:20:54PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 03:57 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Werner,
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:12:46AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > I've read your very interesting mail at
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:32:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347701: fixed in nanourl 0.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:34:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:14:14AM +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> > Package: kdepim
> > Version: 3.5.0-5
> > Severity: grave
>
> > Trying to build a snapshot of tellico, it FTBS because of a
> > missing /usr/lib/libXft.la file. I trie
Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
> you think that the attached patch won't work.
>
> Note that I tried to update the configure script, though I didn't
> manage: either there was a missing definition of CURSES_DISP or there
> was an unexpec
Package: kde-style-lipstik
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
kde-style-lipstik faild to build on a sparc buildd and an ia64 buildd.
Usling current debian libtool has been sugjested to cure this type of
error.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory
Package: gnubg
Version: 0.14.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
gnubg failed to build on a sparc buildd and an ia64 buildd.
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gnubg-0.14.3'
cd . && \
/bin/sh /build/buildd/gnubg-0.14.3/missing --run automake-1.6 --gn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349354 serious
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:29:23PM +0100, Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> [...]
> > The Debian shlibs mechanism is supposed to take care of library dependencies
> > for you. *DO NOT* override this by hard-coding libraries into dependency
> > fields of packages!
> Mmm right. I hard
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:26:04PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:37:51 +0100
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:35:43AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Paul TBBl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:37:51 +0100
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:35:43AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> >
> > >Reading the manpage of mkvmlinuz indicates it can _include_
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:59:34PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > Gnah. You are correct. I'm extending the list of forbidden characters
> > > by $().
> >
> > Upstream has reverted the blacklist and instead went for an improved
> > version of the symlink fix I added to
Please remove the bug reports #343124 and #335418 since the problem has
been resolved.
The non-functionality was caused by bad IP numbers used in combination with
an internal system loop-back behavior that seemed to verify correct
connection through ping testing. This was false, but as not eno
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:32:51PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:49:11PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 02:19:27PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > With some user interaction, this is exploitable through Gnus and
>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 08:56:37PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >Bah, the kernel depends on a ramdisk creator, so there should be no
> >problem.
>
> Not for linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc:
Yeah, sorry, noticed only later that the bug was against the kernels and no
Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > Gnah. You are correct. I'm extending the list of forbidden characters
> > by $().
>
> Upstream has reverted the blacklist and instead went for an improved
> version of the symlink fix I added to ImageMagick in unstable. The patch
> is more involved, but also more robust
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350183 wishlist
Bug#350183: udev (in contrast to hotplug) does not recognize multiple ethernets
consistently
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> tag 350183 upstream help
Bug#350183: udev (in contrast to hotplug) does not recognize multiple ethernet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 347556 pending
Bug#347556: linux-image-2.6.15-1-alpha-generic: undefined symbols in xfs.ko on
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 350167 serious
Bug#350167: rafkill: conflicting dependencies
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
severity 350183 wishlist
tag 350183 upstream help
thanks
On Jan 27, "Peder Chr.Nørgaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> time. Using udev (which I was forced into today, with the new release
> of pcmcia-cs), the boards are inconsistently recognized. Several
It's a consequence of how udev is design
Daniel Kobras wrote:
> found 345238 4:5.4.4.5-1woody7
> found 345238 6:6.0.6.2-2.5
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:49:11PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 02:19:27PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > With some user interaction, this is exploitable through Gnus and
PS:
of course in libgtk2.0-0 2.8.10-1.
I'll upload a new version of gnunet-gtk with automatic shlib dependencies.
As a workaround, you can install the libxinerama1 package.
Arnaud
+++---
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.10-
Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
>
> The Debian shlibs mechanism is supposed to take care of library dependencies
> for you. *DO NOT* override this by hard-coding libraries into dependency
> fields of packages!
Mmm right. I hardcoded because of bug 342108, but it should be fine now
with shlibs for gn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> # the version tracking already gave us this information, and included sid...
> tags 349209 - sarge etch woody
Bug#349209: boost: Boost Graph Library is non-free and undistributable i
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:27:52PM +0100, wen wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:56:55 +0100
> Arnaud Kyheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does ldd /usr/bin/gnunet-gtk tells ?
More importantly:
$ objdump -p /tmp/gnunet/usr/bin/gnunet-gtk |grep NEEDED
NEEDED libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
NEEDED
Duh. Never seen that one, never seen
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=349815 either.
Either you got faulty RAM or something, either it's a really really
well-hidden bug. Care to try valgrinding it?
You'll need valgrind and sylpheed-claws compiled with debug symbols. run
$ valgrin
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:56:55 +0100
Arnaud Kyheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What does ldd /usr/bin/gnunet-gtk tells ?
>
I get:
$ ldd /usr/bin/gnunet-gtk
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x4002)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x4
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:07:31AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: gnome-u2ps
> Version: 0.0.4-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> gnome-u2ps failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder. It also failed with the same error on the mi
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:34:37PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:33:19PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ./configure: line 28114:
> >> syntax error near unexpected token `('
> >> ../configure: line 28114: `case
Package: pcmcia-cs
Version: 3.2.8-5.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The new version of pcmcia-cs - 3.2.8-6 - unconditionally requires
pcmciautils which in it turn requires udev. udev kicks out hotplug.
As udev is not currently on an acceptable level of stability, I don'
Package: udev
Version: 0.082-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have a system with an Asus motherboard with an on-board ethernet
socket, and two RealTek PCI boards. Using hotplug, this works all the
time. Using udev (which I was forced into today, with the new release
of
What does ldd /usr/bin/gnunet-gtk tells ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
Bah, the kernel depends on a ramdisk creator, so there should be no problem.
Not for linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc:
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc
State: installed
Automatically installed: yes
Version: 2.6.15-3
Priority: optional
Section: base
Maintainer: Debian
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:35:43AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>
> >Reading the manpage of mkvmlinuz indicates it can _include_ an initrd in
> >its output, but doesn't indicate it can assemble a ramdisk from scripts
> >+ modules + fairy dust. (Or whatever it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> found 349354 0.062-3
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Bug marked as found in version 0.062-3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Matt Kraai wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I
don't know what'
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 03:57 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Werner,
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 09:12:46AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > I've read your very interesting mail at
>
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html
>
> > What's your recommendation in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349354 critical
Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
Severity set to `critical'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Package: orca
Followup-For: Bug #333915
Please do not depend upon packages with no installation candidate
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348365: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348365: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348365: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347885: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347885: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347885: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347218: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347218: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:47:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347218: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:24:33PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
>
> Why are the two packages openssl and libsslx.x.x not depending on each
> other?
openssl does depend on libssl0.9.8, it has a depends on:
libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8a-1)
There is no reason they should be from the same source version.
Subject: gnunet-gtk doesn't start: cant find libXinerama.so.1
Package: gnunet-gtk
Version: 0.7.0b-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When trying to start gnunet-gtk, I always get the following message:
gnunet-gtk: error while
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350112 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#350112: nsis_2.14-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: misconstructed commandline
Tags were: upstream pending
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hello!
>> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
>> openssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
> I upgraded to openssl 0.9.8a-6 but the Postfix errors stayed.
It works now. I only upgraded openssl and forgot to upgrade libssl0.9.8.
After upg
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:32:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345417: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 343411 wishlist
Bug#343411: vegastrike: Can't play the game: Out of memory error
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> retitle 343411 vegastrike uses too much memory
Bug#343411: vegastrike: Can't play the game: Out of memory error
Changed Bug title.
Package: gtk-qt-engine
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gtk-qt-engine failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my
sparc pbuilder. It failed in the same way on some other buildds,
including ia64.
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/gtk-qt-engine-0.60
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u gnome-python-extras-2.12
Package: gnome-u2ps
Version: 0.0.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gnome-u2ps failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. It also failed with the same error on the mips and mipsel
buildds.
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link cc -g -Wall -O2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348667 serious
Bug#348667: procmail: ignores COMSAT option, sets to 'no' regardless of
configuration.
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 348510 + fixed
Bug#348510: python2.4-gnome2-extras depends upon libgtkhtml2-0 in experimental
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Hi Joey
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
>>Hi Michael,
>>
>>this security bug in xlockmore is still present in all xlockmore versions in
>>the archive and is open for now 190 days. In the meantime we organized a CVE
>>number and a patch that fixes that problem. But still no react
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:51:10PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Incidentally, are you the sparc experimental buildd maintainer? If so,
> could you answer this question:
>
> nsis runs itself in order to perform some tests during the build
> process. As nsis is a compiler for windows installers, and pr
Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I
> > don't know what's different.
>
> Would you please compile and run the attached program on your sy
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Le Vendredi 27 Janvier 2006 16:14, Matt Kraai a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I
> > > don't know what's differ
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's, though... but I don't
> know what's different.
Would you please compile and run the attached program on your system
and let me know what the result is?
--
Matt
#include
#in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349472 +unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#349472: kernel-package - generates broken versions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 349472 +unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:07:29 +0100, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Package: kernel-package Version: 10.032 Severity: grave
> k-p generates broken versions on s390.
>> test -f debian/control || sed -e 's/=V/2.6.16-rc1-s390-s390/g'
Re
Package: evolution
Version: 2.4.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #347703
After the upgrade to evolution-2.4.2.1-1 I noticed this problem as
described in the original report (all CPU used during "Checking folder
consistency" on startup). I was able to get evolution back on its
feet again by renaming .evol
Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> this security bug in xlockmore is still present in all xlockmore versions in
> the archive and is open for now 190 days. In the meantime we organized a CVE
> number and a patch that fixes that problem. But still no reaction from you. I
> know that aren't M
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I'm still getting FTBFS of autogen under pbuilder with version 1:5.8.1-3 on
> i386; from my build log:
>
> ...
[...]
> FAIL: license.test
Thanks for reproducing the problem.
> I see the build is somehow succeeding on the buildd's
� wrote:
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will add the following sentence to the readme:
If you distribute \CONTEXT\ and related software on electronic media
as part of \TEX\ distributions, you may also distribute the manuals
in electronic form, preferable as provided by the maintain
Recai Okta? wrote:
> elog (2.5.7+r1558-4+sarge1) stable-security; urgency=high
>
> * Major security update (big thanks to Florian Weimer)
> + Backport r1333 from upstream's Subversion repository:
> "Fixed crashes with very long (revisions) attributes"
> + Backport r1335
Bastian Venthur escribió:
> Is it possible to adopt only the de-de locale or does adopting the package
> imply to adopt all firefox-locales? Or asked otherwise: is this package hard
> to maintain?
>
> If nobody wants to adopt the package maybe you could make your RFA more
> public
> by asking
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will add the following sentence to the readme:
>
> If you distribute \CONTEXT\ and related software on electronic media
> as part of \TEX\ distributions, you may also distribute the manuals
> in electronic form, preferable as provided by the maintainers of
tag 350112 + pending upstream
thanks for the report and for enabling the grab-deps from experimental patch on
sparc :)
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:52 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> | g++ -o build/release/makensis/7zip/7zGuids.o -c -O2 -Wall __BIG_ENDIAN__
> -D_W...
> | g++: __BIG_ENDIAN__: No s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350112 + pending upstream
Bug#350112: nsis_2.14-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: misconstructed commandline
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, upstream
> thanks for the report and for enabling the grab-deps from experimental patch
> on spar
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:33:19PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ./configure: line 28114:
>> syntax error near unexpected token `('
>> ../configure: line 28114: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space)
>> 2>&1` in'
This appears to be a bug
Package: nsis
Version: 2.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of nsis_2.14-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 79
| Build started at 20060127-0737
| **
| Checking available
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 345238 4:5.4.4.5-1woody7
Bug#345238: [CVE-2005-4601] Shell command injection in delegate code (via file
names)
Bug marked as found in version 4:5.4.4.5-1woody7.
> found 345238 6:6.0.6.2-2.5
Bug#345238: [CVE-2005-4601] Shell command injection in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 350106
Bug#350106: e2fslibs: Dependencie loop
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Gaetan RYCKEBOER <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
found 345238 4:5.4.4.5-1woody7
found 345238 6:6.0.6.2-2.5
thanks
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:49:11PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 02:19:27PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > With some user interaction, this is exploitable through Gnus and
> > Thunderbird. I think this warr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349209 + etch sarge woody
Bug#349209: boost: Boost Graph Library is non-free and undistributable in
compiled form
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch, sarge, woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Is it possible to adopt only the de-de locale or does adopting the package
imply to adopt all firefox-locales? Or asked otherwise: is this package hard
to maintain?
If nobody wants to adopt the package maybe you could make your RFA more public
by asking on d-devel or ask the firefox-maintainers
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I guess the license is GPL-incompatible, but DFSG-free. And *that* is
>>> not a practical problem, since nobody would want to reuse the code from
>>> tex.web in a new project.
>>
>> But pdfTeX does, and it c
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:18:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:18:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Hi Kapil,
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> I have submitted a new patch report to the relevant bugs with an
> alternative solution. Let us see what the maintainer thinks of the
> new patch.
Um, are you sure that there aren't any public functions in libpng to
achieve the same?
As a wild guess (really
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
