[no subject]

2003-12-09 Thread 佳能影音器材有限公司
debian-devel,您好! 致 礼! 佳能影音器材有限公司 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   2003-12-10

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:18:21PM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: | Agreed on that, but it's not rewriting all of the menu package, which | is what I felt your post implied. Rewriting all menu files is fairly | trivial and does not have to be done all at once. It should also be fairly easy to get i

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:25PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: | Alternate approaches (that involve significantly less work) That's the bit that I (and presumably others) am not convinced about. You keep making this assertion, but with little to back it up. Have you, e.g., looked at the Catego

Re: APT-Fu 0.2.3 (was: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source)

2003-12-09 Thread Miles Bader
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > p.s. why Apt-Fu ? Is that 'APT Kung-Fu' or what ? Hmm, after apt-src, > apt-build, and similar 'build that debian source package' tools, I've been > expecting for 'apt-too' ;-) FWIW, the `fu' in kung-fu means something like style or technique, so apt

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - how to run madison and wanna-build I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a read-only copy of the database madison consults. wanna-build presumably needs more real-time access, though. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Clint Adams
> - how to run the DELAYED queue (to give the possibility of deleting > things from it or to see what's in it) > > - how to give developers the possibility of seeing what's in the queue > (daily rsyncs are not good enough for this; I've frequently pulled > packages from the accepted queue to

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Straw man, again. The proposal was to rewrite all menu entries as > .desktop files - Yes. That is a straw man. -- Henning Makholm"Nej, hvor er vi altså heldige! Længe leve vor Buxgører S

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > In which format shall application packages store > > their menu information. > It doesn't matter, If you don't think the problem being discussed matters, why are you participating in the discussion?

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:29PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > > Are you claiming that everyone who says that .desktop has technical > > advantages is a liar? > No. I'm claiming that everyone who says that "only by using .desktop > exclusively ca

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Billy Biggs
Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:54AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: > > Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > It's "pass a few more text fields through to the menu methods, and > > > use them to generate .desktop files" versus "rewrite everything". > > >

Re: Initrd rocks! (was Re: Backporting 2.4.23 kernel packages)

2003-12-09 Thread Brian May
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:31:19PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > This is distinct from the autodetection in the kernel that is capable of > > automatically scanning all harddisks on all busses to find RAID devices. > > Why can't you use the kernel autoconfig or does that only work with >

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:54AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote: > Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > It's "pass a few more text fields through to the menu methods, and use > > them to generate .desktop files" versus "rewrite everything". > > You sure it's "rewrite everything"? A script to

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:29PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > > > You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the debian > > > menu system? Like i1

Assurance measures: AVA (There should be some white hats around also)

2003-12-09 Thread Magosányi Árpád
Hi! Vulnerability assessment is continously happening. It is a common estimation that the public sees its results with some two months delay in average. Actually the other assurance measures are invented to have as few facts to be found by AVA, as possible. AVA_CCA.1 Covert channel analysis (EAL5

走!!一起去泡温泉~~

2003-12-09 Thread ffwe
南昆山、龙门温泉活动召集(超级腐败~~~) 【时 间】2003-12-13 07:30― 2003-12-14 18:00 【大致行程】 D1:周六早上7.30在深圳市体育馆集合,前往有广东黄山之称的――南昆山国家森林公园,地处惠州市龙门县,是一个森林覆盖率为96.6%的巨大绿色宝库,有“北回归线上的绿洲”之称。到达南昆山欣赏南昆山奇景―一线天,午餐后游川龙瀑布、石河奇观,之后于观音潭里尝试这里的天然按摩池,享受独特的自然理疗(太FB了~~),更能欣赏独一无二的奇松――蛇松、南昆竹海等~~晚饭后自由活动! D2:早餐后沿着林阴小径拾级登山,一路山,朦胧远山,入云碧峰,深幽峡谷、苍劲

零租金香港百货特价拍卖场隆 重 招 商

2003-12-09 Thread jackey
零 香港百货特价拍卖场 租金隆 重 招 商 主办:致富深港有限公司 开展地点:华能大厦西区6F  为迎接圣诞新年的到来,加速深港两地小商品的流通。为大众节前购物提供一个优惠大平台,致富中国深港有公司特承办该项活动,本次活动荟萃香港最新最全的各类特价商品,会展面积约1800平方米,规模之大,品种之全在深圳沿属首次。余部分铺位,诚邀下列招商范围内中国大陆厂商进驻(港式管理)凡2003-12-18号前入场者,一律零租金。 招商范围:衣、食、住、行 咨询热线:83774985 ,83774986业务专线:13714794035,13714317640 咨询热线:83774985

Assurance measures: ATE (well, ehhrmm)

2003-12-09 Thread Magosányi Árpád
Hi! The open source development method have a very different approach to tests from the commercial development method: Testing is a largely uncoordinated effort, driven by the individual needs of users. That means that zero to none evidence is gathered on tests actually ran, and no structured appr

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:37:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: >> - how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been >> running dinstall -n, via dput -D; I suppose it would be possible to >> upload separately to the mirror and test t

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-09 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:06:02PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Jamin W. Collins wrote [in a different order]: > > However, I'd prefer to have a "work in progress" blurb in > README.Debian, partially to acknowledge that there are still some > things to be smoothed out. (The reason I believe an u

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Bruce Sass
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Tom wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:06:48PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > freedesktop entry features > debian menu file features > > > > Therefore you can do a lossless transition from .desktop to menu, but not > > the other way around. It makes sense to use th

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:37:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > - how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been > running dinstall -n, via dput -D; I suppose it would be possible to > upload separately to the mirror and test there, but that's awkward.) Seems to me that,

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Bruce Sass
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > >> You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the > >> debian menu system? Like i18n, icon theming, dynamic construction

Re: RFS: phpgroupware

2003-12-09 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Jamin W. Collins wrote [in a different order]: > I've given most of the packages a cursory look. I do have a few > suggestions and may be willing to sponsor them. Thanks. > Packaging concerns: > - In several locations throughout the debconf questions you use "DBMS", > this should probably be re

Re: Integrate Knoppix in Debian (was: Re: Debian Enterprise?)

2003-12-09 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:38:38PM +0100, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote: > Ummm... You are wrong here. Knoppix (or Knoppix-derived versions) provide > three things: > ... > 4- a system to duplicate this live Cd into hard disk, making the necessary > changes based on what was auto-detected

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It makes a lot of sense to restrict auric permanently and have an > up-to-date mirror for general access purposes. The issues I can think > of are: Although I agree that there is definitely something to be said for this approach, I would like to note a

密码更新了

2003-12-09 Thread mima
密码大赠送的密码又更新了 http://film.wx-e.com/

Re: How to avoid multiple dependencies with shlibdeps

2003-12-09 Thread Oliver Kurth
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:44:48PM +0100, Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote: > Hi, > > I maintain a program which needs to depend on certain version of some > library (the earlier ones are incompatibile, despite soname wasn't > changed), but I would also like to use shlib:Depends for other > libraries. >

Re: APT-Fu 0.2.3 (was: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source)

2003-12-09 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 12:20, Eric Wong wrote: > Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --cut-- > > OK, I'll do my best to have all the changes you requested done and > > tested by tomorrow. Let me know if you have any other feature requests > > and/or bug reports. First of all, thank you ve

Re: How to avoid multiple dependencies with shlibdeps

2003-12-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:44:48PM +0100, Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote: > I maintain a program which needs to depend on certain version of some > library (the earlier ones are incompatibile, despite soname wasn't > changed), but I would also like to use shlib:Depends for other > libraries. Shared li

How to avoid multiple dependencies with shlibdeps

2003-12-09 Thread Adam Byrtek / alpha
Hi, I maintain a program which needs to depend on certain version of some library (the earlier ones are incompatibile, despite soname wasn't changed), but I would also like to use shlib:Depends for other libraries. Now I use: Depends: libtlen1 (>= 20021117), ${shlibs:Depends} But it generates d

Bug#223469: ITP: qca -- The Qt Cryptographic Architecture (QCA), cryptographic algorithmns for Qt programs

2003-12-09 Thread Jan Niehusmann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: qca Version : not yet released, currently CVS only Upstream Author : Justin Karneges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://psi.affinix.com/ * License : LGPL Description : The Qt Cryptographic Architecture (QCA)

Re: Initrd rocks! (was Re: Backporting 2.4.23 kernel packages)

2003-12-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 02:02:10PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > The recent versions of the package have significant problems if you want to > > convert to or from devfs. The Debian mkinitrd has become too complex to > > manage so I have chosen not to b

Re: Building Debian Completely From Source

2003-12-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:52:39AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > There are quite a few, but make is a bad example, as it has included a > > > shell script to build itself for just this purpose. >

Re: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/

2003-12-09 Thread Raphael Goulais
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 15:56, Colin Watson wrote: > > 733 release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were opened. > master ran out of disk space, which confused it. I've fixed it now. Too bad. I wanted to believe it ;) Raphael

Re: Building Debian Completely From Source

2003-12-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:54:45AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:48, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > >On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 04:10:36PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > >>make? You'll need make installed to make make. There are a huge > >>number > >>of legitimat

Re: LDAP gateway broken?

2003-12-09 Thread John Goerzen
An added note: When I forced gpg to not use the subkey for the sig, it worked. -- John On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:22:16AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:52:31PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Try again. Be sure to make a new sigature. > > Now I get: > > Error: An er

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Billy Biggs
Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > It's "pass a few more text fields through to the menu methods, and use > them to generate .desktop files" versus "rewrite everything". You sure it's "rewrite everything"? A script to parse all .desktop files in /usr/share/applications and output the same

Re: password setting via db.debian.org working?

2003-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:17:44PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Following the instructions on > https://db.debian.org/password.html, I have tried to get a new > password. This has had no apparent effect, although I've tried > it a few times now. I haven't received a bounce or a reply. > Anyone else

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:06:48PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > >> You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the > >> debian menu system? Like i18n, icon them

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:29PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: | > Because you gain *nothing* | | Are you claiming that everyone who says that .desktop has technical | advantages is a liar? These features actually do not exist in the | desktop format? (It may be so; I have no firsthand informat

Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the debian > > menu system? Like i18n, icon theming, dynamic construction of a menu > > hierarchy based on use

Re: Building Debian Completely From Source

2003-12-09 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:48, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 04:10:36PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: make? You'll need make installed to make make. There are a huge number of legitimate circular build dependencies, outlawing them won't help. There are quite a few, but make is a b

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

2003-12-09 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Dec 8, 2003, at 07:14, Julian Mehnle wrote: Apart from that, as soon as the use of IPv6 broadens, dynamically assigned IP addresses will diminish. Stateless autoconfig + privacy extensions means quite the opposite is likely to occur.

Re: http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/

2003-12-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:11:08PM +0100, Magosányi Árpád wrote: > The page says: > > 733 release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were opened. > > Is it a problem in the script, or there is something I haven't > listen to? master ran out of disk space, which confused it. I've fixed it now. T

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: >> You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the >> debian menu system? Like i18n, icon theming, dynamic construction of a >> menu hierarchy based on user /Desktop system prefer

Re: LDAP gateway broken?

2003-12-09 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:52:31PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Try again. Be sure to make a new sigature. Now I get: Error: An error occured while performing the LDAP lookup ==> Message Error: Key not found I signed with my normal Debian key: You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key f

Re: Re: Debian packages and freedesktop.org (Gnome, KDE, etc) menu entries

2003-12-09 Thread Tom
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:06:48PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > freedesktop entry features > debian menu file features > > Therefore you can do a lossless transition from .desktop to menu, but not > the other way around. It makes sense to use the .desktop standard. I know what you mea

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

2003-12-09 Thread Tom
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:12:13AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > . Could you please try > to keep debian-devel posts to well-thought-out [1] technical content, Sure. I'd also ask everyone to keep their anti-American, anti-Bush SIGs and random comments out of both lists. I have acted like a jack

Re: Assurance measures: ALC (The hidden treasure of Debian)

2003-12-09 Thread Florian Weimer
Magosányi Árpád wrote: > (Well, the word "confidentality" is not applicable in our > case. Otherwise there are numerous measures.) It is, Debian has decided to hide security bugs systematically from its users (albeit for a limited time only, but the process is there).

http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/

2003-12-09 Thread Magosányi Árpád
The page says: 733 release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were opened. Is it a problem in the script, or there is something I haven't listen to? -- GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

2003-12-09 Thread Tom
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:45:58PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > As for acting like a Jackass, the Johnny Knoxville and his colleagues are > very > talented entertainers who work hard. I wouldn't compare them to you in any > way. Oh, I dunno. I got *your* attention. But chill the hell out

Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system call

2003-12-09 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:52, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:12:13AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > . Could you please try > > to keep debian-devel posts to well-thought-out [1] technical content, > > Sure. I'd also ask everyone to keep their anti-American, anti-Bush SIGs

Re: recovery status update

2003-12-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:51:54AM +, James Troup wrote: > Where can I login? > -- > > There's been a fair bit of talk post-compromise about restricting > access to machines running (core) services. At the moment, the only >

APT-Fu 0.2.3 (was: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source)

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Wong
Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:48:21PM -0800, Eric Wong wrote: > > I have one feature request: I'd like to have an option so that I can ask > > it to rebuild arch-indep packages just like it rebuilds other packages. > >

Re: password setting via db.debian.org working?

2003-12-09 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Ben Pfaff wrote: Following the instructions on https://db.debian.org/password.html, I have tried to get a new password. This has had no apparent effect, although I've tried it a few times now. I haven't received a bounce or a reply. Anyone else experienced this? Use the "| mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

compromised servers.

2003-12-09 Thread Halil Demirezen
Is there a scheduled time to see the compromised servers up again? sincerely.

password setting via db.debian.org working?

2003-12-09 Thread Ben Pfaff
Following the instructions on https://db.debian.org/password.html, I have tried to get a new password. This has had no apparent effect, although I've tried it a few times now. I haven't received a bounce or a reply. Anyone else experienced this? (Not a huge deal, because I can still log in with

Re: LDAP gateway broken?

2003-12-09 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, John Goerzen wrote: > I just sent my first-ever message to the LDAP gateway to reset my > password. I got the below message back. BTW, my clock is accurate. > > I used the exact "echo" command given in the docs. > > Also, I received no other reply. There is a small bug in