I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it
handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/).
Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this
differently? Which other servers should I check out?
W. Andrew Loe III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it
handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/).
Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this
differently? Which other servers
Am 2005-01-12 16:27:05, schrieb W. Andrew Loe III:
I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it
handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/).
Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this
differently? Which other
Michael F. Sprague wrote:
W. Andrew Loe III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it
handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/).
Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this
differently
think that this is an issue related to Mail.app. It
depends on how it is served by the IMAP daemon. But I never experienced
any problems when using together Courier-IMAPd, Maildir as the storage
backend and Mail.app as the frontend.
Regards,
Philipp Kern
as
thunderbird works perfectly.
Eh... I don't think that this is an issue related to Mail.app. It
depends on how it is served by the IMAP daemon. But I never
experienced any problems when using together Courier-IMAPd, Maildir as
the storage backend and Mail.app as the frontend.
We've
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 18:34, Eric Jennings wrote:
We've experienced some issues with courier-imapd and Mail.app,
specifically where certain IMAP sub-Maildir mailboxes wouldn't display
within Mail.app. The mailboxes work great within Thunderbird.
It's been infrequent enough where we
I do recall at one stage you had to create a symlink back to the base of the
Maildir called INBOX for Mail.app to work:
ln -s Maildir/ Maildir/.INBOX
Hope that helps
Ned
We've experienced some issues with courier-imapd and Mail.app,
specifically where certain IMAP sub-Maildir mailboxes
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:03:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ce jour Mon, 13 Dec 2004, W.Andrew Loe III a dit:
I am trying to figure out how to re-build my SSL certificates for
postfix and courier-imap. Right now my certificate for postfix has some
errors on it (wrong CN), but I
I am trying to figure out how to re-build my SSL certificates for
postfix and courier-imap. Right now my certificate for postfix has some
errors on it (wrong CN), but I am able to download it and set it to be
accepted by OS X (ends pop-ups in Mail.app). My courier-imap
certificate does
I get the above error from imp3 running with PHP4 and Apache2. Any idea what
the cause might be?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:11, Russell Coker wrote:
I get the above error from imp3 running with PHP4 and Apache2. Any idea
what the cause might be?
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache2/php.ini
extension=imap.so
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:28, Jan Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache2/php.ini
extension=imap.so
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache/php.ini
extension=imap.so
Thanks for that!
Upgrading from php3 to php4 while upgrading from Apache 1.x to Apache 2.x
seemed to have missed
/php.ini
assuming that you have php4-imap installed, of course.
Cheers,
--
Brett Parker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:40, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:28, Jan Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache2/php.ini
extension=imap.so
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache/php.ini
extension=imap.so
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:56, Jan Wagner wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:40, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:28, Jan Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# grep imap /etc/php4/apache2/php.ini
extension=imap.so
# grep imap
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:56, Jan Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upgrading from php3 to php4 while upgrading from Apache 1.x to Apache 2.x
seemed to have missed those extension lines. I now have IMP working
again.
I did ran into this issue 1 week ago. It happened when I was updating from
but not practical. btw, you can check courier's config settings for a
much more interesting/exotic method, sending mail via imap. if you so
desperately want to live (in) interesting times.
I will
danke
--
Konstantin Kostadinov
Hi All
I'v the problem with courier-imapd and pop-before-smtp sync :-)
So my pop-before-smtp give 30m grace period for smtp sending.
Users mail client is set to use IMAP and after login the imap session stays active and
do not reconnect, pop-before-smtp timeouts after 30m and the client cannot
sync :-)
So my pop-before-smtp give 30m grace period for smtp sending.
Users mail client is set to use IMAP and after login the imap session
stays active and do not reconnect, pop-before-smtp timeouts after 30m
and the client cannot sends email until reopen email client and imap
Konstantin Kostadinov wrote:
but not practical. btw, you can check courier's config settings for a
much more interesting/exotic method, sending mail via imap. if you so
desperately want to live (in) interesting times.
wwell edi
[cut]
Oo yes i know this way but the other is interesting
How should the IMAP_EMPTYTRASH option be set to completely disable
automaticly emptying the trash and archiving the sent folders? I have
tried IMAP_EMPTYTRASH:0 and it still removes items from the trash folder
when the IMAP sessions reconnects. Has anyone else encountered this?
Thanks
Schiwinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: Cyrus Imap Sieve problems
You have to install libsasl2-modules.
Then SASL PLAIN will show up.
Been experimenting with Cyrus Imap on Debian/unstable. Any tips on
getting Sieve working? I'm
Schiwinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: Cyrus Imap Sieve problems
You have to install libsasl2-modules.
Then SASL PLAIN will show up.
Been experimenting with Cyrus Imap on Debian/unstable. Any tips on
getting Sieve
You have to install libsasl2-modules.
Then SASL PLAIN will show up.
Been experimenting with Cyrus Imap on Debian/unstable. Any tips on
getting Sieve working? I'm using ldap to authenticate both Cyrus Imap
and Postfix. All programs from deb packages. Incoming messages headers
do have an X-Sieve
You have to install libsasl2-modules.
Then SASL PLAIN will show up.
Been experimenting with Cyrus Imap on Debian/unstable. Any tips on
getting Sieve working? I'm using ldap to authenticate both Cyrus Imap
and Postfix. All programs from deb packages. Incoming messages headers
do have an X-Sieve
Le lun 21/06/2004 à 02:31, Conny Brunnkvist a écrit :
Nate Duehr wrote:
Ward Willats wrote:
Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP
.
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for
those of us that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
Well, the pop-before-smtp packages just watches for successful
logins in your mail-log. Therefore it should work with IMAP, too.
Although I haven't checked since I never came
of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
FWIW, I was the original poster and I was only referring to the technique
of grab mail before authentication - we use imap(s) as well. As myself
and others have said, 'exact' works well
Le lun 21/06/2004 à 02:31, Conny Brunnkvist a écrit :
Nate Duehr wrote:
Ward Willats wrote:
Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP
.
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for
those of us that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
Well, the pop-before-smtp packages just watches for successful
logins in your mail-log. Therefore it should work with IMAP, too.
Although I haven't checked since I never came
of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
FWIW, I was the original poster and I was only referring to the technique
of grab mail before authentication - we use imap(s) as well. As myself
and others have said, 'exact' works well
Ward Willats wrote:
Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
you, with no existing client configuration changes.
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us
way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
I would recommend using EXACT[1] for example. IMAP-before-SMTP will not
work as well as POP-before-SMTP, though. The reason is simple: with
POP3, you connect, download the e-mails and de-connect
Nate Duehr wrote:
Ward Willats wrote:
Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us that left POP3 in the 80's where
Ward Willats wrote:
Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
you, with no existing client configuration changes.
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us
way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
I would recommend using EXACT[1] for example. IMAP-before-SMTP will not
work as well as POP-before-SMTP, though. The reason is simple: with
POP3, you connect, download the e-mails and de-connect
Nate Duehr wrote:
Ward Willats wrote:
Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique
server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank
Anyone know of any good way to implement IMAP before relay for those of
us that left POP3 in the 80's where
Hi list,
I already sent this mail to the info-cyrus list two days ago, but I didn't
get any answers. I hope someone here can help me.
I want cyrus-imap to authenticate via GSSAPI against our active directory.
I am using Debian testing (hoping it will become stable soon) with the
according
Hi list,
I already sent this mail to the info-cyrus list two days ago, but I didn't
get any answers. I hope someone here can help me.
I want cyrus-imap to authenticate via GSSAPI against our active directory.
I am using Debian testing (hoping it will become stable soon) with the
according
Hi.
Been experimenting with Cyrus Imap on Debian/unstable. Any tips on
getting Sieve working? I'm using ldap to authenticate both Cyrus Imap
and Postfix. All programs from deb packages. Incoming messages headers
do have an X-Sieve line.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:docs$ sieveshell -a jhawley -u
I havn't tried cyrus+ldap, but with pam you need
a '/etc/pam.d/sieve' beside '/etc/pam.d/pop' and
'/etc/pam.d/imap'.
Probably you have to do something similar with ldap.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: John Hawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 6:49 PM
Hi.
Been experimenting with Cyrus Imap on Debian/unstable. Any tips on
getting Sieve working? I'm using ldap to authenticate both Cyrus Imap
and Postfix. All programs from deb packages. Incoming messages headers
do have an X-Sieve line.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:docs$ sieveshell -a jhawley -u
I havn't tried cyrus+ldap, but with pam you need
a '/etc/pam.d/sieve' beside '/etc/pam.d/pop' and
'/etc/pam.d/imap'.
Probably you have to do something similar with ldap.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: John Hawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 6:49 PM
. Especially more performant than plain IMAP
replication. Anybody having numbers on these ones?
I guess you don't want to sync at the file system level. Coda
won't be an easy battle and is generally agreed not to be
suitable for real-time applications (read: bloody slow).
Moreover, apart from
. Especially more performant than plain IMAP
replication. Anybody having numbers on these ones?
I guess you don't want to sync at the file system level. Coda
won't be an easy battle and is generally agreed not to be
suitable for real-time applications (read: bloody slow).
Moreover, apart from
system it's automagically synced to the other. A friend of mine proposed
Cyrus and murder to setup a load balancer which would sync all imap
requests altering one mailspool to the other. (and mail could be relayed
to the other system thru a procmail recipe with setting an X-Loop
header, so that'd
the slow network connection, but somewhat i doubt it'll be
performant over internet. Especially more performant than plain IMAP
replication. Anybody having numbers on these ones?
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:00:09AM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
I came accross the idea of using CODA for replication of the filesys
even though the slow network connection, but somewhat i doubt it'll be
performant over internet. Especially more performant than plain IMAP
replication. Anybody
of that but most clients I have won't let go of pop3. When
imap is used Outlook (and other mail clients) like to make quite a few
connections to the server, it could be that some connections are getting
refused. I've run into this and it's not an obvious problem.
I usually increase MAXPERIP to 10, it's
of that but most clients I have won't let go of pop3. When
imap is used Outlook (and other mail clients) like to make quite a few
connections to the server, it could be that some connections are getting
refused. I've run into this and it's not an obvious problem.
I usually increase MAXPERIP to 10, it's
Hello,
Have a look at SSLwrap. It enables SSL for the outside world but locally
no encryption is used.
Brian
[Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and
-user.]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 07:16:26PM -0600, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
Jonathan Matthews wrote:
[...]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible.
My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap
Hello,
Have a look at SSLwrap. It enables SSL for the outside world but locally
no encryption is used.
Brian
[Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and
-user.]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 07:16:26PM -0600, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
Jonathan Matthews wrote:
[...]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible.
My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap
We are using courier-imap in the configuration outlined on the marlow.dk
website.
One problem we keep having involves M$ Outlook clients. It seems that
something breaks with the communication between the server and Outlook
clients (or posssible corrupts the pst files created for each maildir
Jonathan Matthews wrote:
[Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and
-user.]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible.
My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap
[Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and
-user.]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible.
My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap with Exim 4
backported
Jonathan Matthews wrote:
[Sorry for the cross-post - I think it's applicable to both -isp and
-user.]
I need to offer imap, imapssl and pop3ssl services. FWIW, imap would be
localhost only, but -ssl services would be publically accessible.
My reading thus far leads me towards Courier-imap
We are using courier-imap in the configuration outlined on the marlow.dk
website.
One problem we keep having involves M$ Outlook clients. It seems that
something breaks with the communication between the server and Outlook
clients (or posssible corrupts the pst files created for each maildir
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:16, Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a courier/postfix maildir IMAP mail server with 10GB of RAM.
Occasionally, the memory gets all chewed up and it becomes unusable. I
think it becoming unusable because of buffer bounces.
However, the documentation tells me
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Baarda) wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:19:23PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
For such things instead of trying to patch a Debian kernel source tree or
a kernel.org tree I recommend taking a working and tested kernel source
tree such as
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:19:23PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:16, Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
For such things instead of trying to patch a Debian kernel source tree or a
kernel.org tree I recommend taking a working and tested kernel source tree
such as
Thanks, that sounds like a perfectly good way to solve the problem.
I never thought to use another distro's kernel.
I guess it does not really hurt anything to use the RedHat kernel on a
Debian system. Actually, I forgot that RedHat has been making a big effort to
create a kernel that would
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:16, Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a courier/postfix maildir IMAP mail server with 10GB of RAM.
Occasionally, the memory gets all chewed up and it becomes unusable. I
think it becoming unusable because of buffer bounces.
However, the documentation tells me
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:19:23PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:16, Theodore Knab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
For such things instead of trying to patch a Debian kernel source tree or a
kernel.org tree I recommend taking a working and tested kernel source tree
such as
Thanks, that sounds like a perfectly good way to solve the problem.
I never thought to use another distro's kernel.
I guess it does not really hurt anything to use the RedHat kernel on a
Debian system. Actually, I forgot that RedHat has been making a big effort to
create a kernel that would
What Debian Linux Kernel works best for High Memory ( 4GB) machines
that are
under heavy io loads ?
I have a courier/postfix maildir IMAP mail server with 10GB of RAM.
Occasionally, the memory gets all chewed up and it becomes unusable. I
think it becoming unusable because of buffer bounces
The courier-imap IMAP server uses the dot ('.') as a separator for
IMAP folders and not the slash ('/'). So, IMAP subfolders are not nice
Unix subdirectories.
I thought that you just had to have, for example:
Maildir/.folder1
Maildir/.folder2
Maildir/.folder3
I.e. the folders
And if I create, from an IMAP client, a subfolder foo of folder1, I
get Maildir/.folder1.foo instead of the more logical Maildir/folder1/foo.
I see. I hadn't ever tried that, I can see how that is annoying.
Take care,
Dale
--
Dale E. Martin, Clifton Labs, Inc.
Senior Computer
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:22:40AM -0500,
Dale E Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
I thought that you just had to have, for example:
Maildir/.folder1
And if I create, from an IMAP client, a subfolder foo of folder1,
I get Maildir/.folder1.foo instead
The courier-imap IMAP server uses the dot ('.') as a separator for
IMAP folders and not the slash ('/'). So, IMAP subfolders are not nice
Unix subdirectories.
Is there a way to change it? Reading the source code, it seems it is
not easy, there is not even a '#define FOLDER_SEP .', rather
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:22:40AM -0500,
Dale E Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
I thought that you just had to have, for example:
Maildir/.folder1
And if I create, from an IMAP client, a subfolder foo of folder1,
I get Maildir/.folder1.foo instead
Hi Guys
We have squirrelmail running on our mail gateway for remote users to
access their mail from, however sometimes the users mailboxes reside on
other mailservers throughout the WAN.
Is there a way to configure squirrelmail to use something like perhaps
perdition to point
to the users
Hello,
Hopefully someone can help me. I'm trying to put together a nice
Exim4 + LDAP + Courier IMAP with Maildir mail server. I've got
Exim4 delivering mail properly to Maildirs for virtual domains with
the domains existing in LDAP and all virtual mail accounts in LDAP.
Now I need to be able
I don't see where I can set up retention policies in Courier IMAP. Is
there a good web reference for this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Squirrel Mail is giving ne this error from my
courier-imap server
"Unknown response
from IMAP server: 1.* NO Cannot open message 1 + courier"
and it oly seems to be my one account so
far.
Anyone got an idea how i can fix it ?
Oh and netscape is not talking to courier-imap
Hi Guys
Can anyone tell me how to configure Courier to read mail from user
maildirs
in the path and format /var/spool/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
ie /var/spool/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any assitance would be appreciated.
Thanks
Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On July 16, 2003 05:52 am, Craig wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to configure Courier to read mail from user
maildirs
in the path and format /var/spool/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
ie /var/spool/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set the user's home to /var/spool/mail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ and have their mail
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:23:57PM +, yves codjia wrote:
hello all
I searched for a way to implement IMAP quota using CourierIMAP + authmysqlrc
some one can help me pls !
Two ways:
- use maildrop to deliver, it can search for quota in mysql then deliver
the message and update
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:23:57PM +, yves codjia wrote:
hello all
I searched for a way to implement IMAP quota using CourierIMAP + authmysqlrc
some one can help me pls !
Two ways:
- use maildrop to deliver, it can search for quota in mysql then deliver
the message and update
hello all
I searched for a way to implement IMAP quota using CourierIMAP + authmysqlrc
some one can help me pls !
:)
--
linux for the revolution'@'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello all
I searched for a way to implement IMAP quota using CourierIMAP + authmysqlrc
some one can help me pls !
:)
--
linux for the revolution'@'
is not working. When I test it through telnet, I get:
flizzle:~# telnet localhost imap
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to flizzle.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2002 Double Precision, Inc. See
COPYING for distribution information.
1 login [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
* BYE [ALERT
+ Vpopmail (virtual users) +
Courier IMAP and MySQL autenthification, I you need help regarding that configuration
I could help.
As you have sayd you still dont have exim installed and thats maybe why you cannot
access Maildirs, because maybe there are no maildirs to access?.
Perhaps if you
May I suggest postfix as an MTA if your keen on doing *sql lookups.
I found the best solution for mass mailing host is postfix + amavisd-new
+ spamassassin + razor + clamd + mysql + courier-imap/pop3 . There's
plenty of howto's around for it.
-Original Message-
From: Jos Elkink [mailto
is not working. When I test it through telnet, I get:
flizzle:~# telnet localhost imap
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to flizzle.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2002 Double Precision, Inc. See
COPYING for distribution information.
1 login [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
* BYE [ALERT
+ Vpopmail (virtual
users) + Courier IMAP and MySQL autenthification, I you need help regarding
that configuration I could help.
As you have sayd you still dont have exim installed and thats maybe why you
cannot access Maildirs, because maybe there are no maildirs to access?.
Perhaps if you
May I suggest postfix as an MTA if your keen on doing *sql lookups.
I found the best solution for mass mailing host is postfix + amavisd-new
+ spamassassin + razor + clamd + mysql + courier-imap/pop3 . There's
plenty of howto's around for it.
-Original Message-
From: Jos Elkink [mailto
Hello,
because I will get in arround 2-4 month my ADSL-Line with fixed
IP-Address I like to install the whole courier-imap server (with
webmail, pop3, mta... and fetchmail)
Now I do not know, how to intergrate fprot or McAffee in my Server.
(I have no experience with courier-imap)
Note
Hello,
because I will get in arround 2-4 month my ADSL-Line with fixed
IP-Address I like to install the whole courier-imap server (with
webmail, pop3, mta... and fetchmail)
Now I do not know, how to intergrate fprot or McAffee in my Server.
(I have no experience with courier-imap)
Note
I can't compile with authmysql on debian 3 woody...
yes i do have all the require lib's for mysql got a full server install
and libmysqlclient10 installed.
I have tried the following as sergested by the faq and in mailing list...
CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/ssl/include
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/ssl/lib
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 12:57:30PM -, Gregory Machin wrote:
I can't compile with authmysql on debian 3 woody...
Do you really need self compiled courier-authmysql and mysql ... both
exists in woody...
--
Emmanuel Lacour Easter-eggs
44-46 rue de l'Ouest
that there's no need to compile it yourself, since courier-imap
and authmysql are in stable (Woody). If you realyy want to compile your own,
then get the debianized sources with build dependencies and satisfy them. In
most cases backporting to woody is easier than building from un-debianized
sources
Please advise me on where i can tell the ./configure where to find the
libraries it requires ...
I keep getting errors indicating that it needs that it cant find
libraries that i know are installed ..
the latest
cannont find either gdbm or the db libraries
and any advice on setting up
try this:
remove all sources that you are downloaded and trying to compile.
apt-get update
apt-cache show courier - select your packages - example :
apt-get install courier-authdaemon courier-pop - this will add you courier auth
daemon and courier pop3 daemon
edit the courer auth daemon
Hi Guys
Can anyone recommend a good, solid, fast IMAP daemon that uses
mbox format ?
..Craig
Hi Guys
Can anyone recommend a good, solid, fast IMAP daemon that uses
mbox format ?
..Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I used uw-imap until I decided to move to Maildir and now I use
courier-imap. I
Dnia Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 02:13:16AM -0500 Shawn Wallbridge napisa/a:
I used uw-imap until I decided to move to Maildir and now I use
courier-imap. I found both to be quite solid and stable.
I use uw-imap on one of my servers, it works nice with mboxes.
On another box i had to install imap
Hi all,
Next week, we have to install a new server with
Courier IMAP, Postfix and OpenLDAP for 200 users.
Are there any site with documentation about this ??
And another question: How can I migrate mailbox
accounts to Maildir boxes ???
Thank you very much for your help and sorry for my bad
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
