Colin Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you're wrong. The mailcrypt front end, for example, works with
both. And that's the case we are talking about.
It depends how the compatibility works. If it's mailcrypt providing
the compatibility, then it's mailcrypt that should list the
What's the best way to go about writing an Acceptable Use Policy for
networks?
My searches for information have come up empty so if anyone has any links,
they would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Leonard Leblanc
Vice-president - Technology
www.emergeknowledge.com
--
To
You might want to have a look at a few other big network's AUP's
here are 2 of the big ISP's in .au
http://www.bigpond.com/broadband/support/aupindex.asp
http://www.optushome.com.au/aup.html
They might help you out a bit, but everything is different. AUP's can
take -months- to make.
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
one thing, I use vim and mutt, how could I wrap the lines at 72
characters? Thank you.
:set wm=8
:set ai
that normally does it for me.
~Tim
--
17:36:33 up 6 days, 21:40, 13 users, load
Yoros,
I pulled this off of the Mutt list [http://www.mutt.org]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Put this in your .muttrc config file
set editor=vim -c 'set textwidth=72'
OR add the following to your .vimrc config file:
set the textwidth to 72 characters for replies (emailusenet)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian == Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Florian Eh, software which provides the 'editor' virtual package *has*
Florian a consistent command line interface. The user interfaces are
(If I may add my own clarification) a somewhat
* Tim Haynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010621 16:39]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
one thing, I use vim and mutt, how could I wrap the lines at 72
characters? Thank you.
:set wm=8
:set ai
that normally does it for me.
From Florian Weimer on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
It's clear to me we need a virtual package for pgp implementation
that both pgp and gnupg can
Good, good, good. I know, thank you.
--
yoros
PGP signature
From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph == Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper
(well, because then it wouldn't be a _virtual_ package, but ignoring
that...)
Heh.
You can take a look at this AUP, and you might even want to take a look at
*spits* AOL's *spits* AUP as well. I haven't looked at theirs, but I've read
over ours several times.
http://www.earthlink.net/about/policies/use/index.html
and up one level has several different public policies we have
From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
Joseph == Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
below). Although if you volunteer to make it happen... :-)
Hubert Changing all the packages to work properly wouldn't be a simple
Hubert task. (Not saying that it's a bad idea, though.)
Joseph
Hello,
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Is there any known reason for this choice ?
signature
Grégoire
Gregoire Welraeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Is there any known reason for
Tim Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
2.2r2) may fix some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf == Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
Olaf environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
Olaf secure box where I am the one and only normal user, but that's
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf == Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
Olaf environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
Olaf secure box where I am the one and only normal user, but that's
Robert Mognet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mailcrypt isn't part of Debian, so it's not the responciblity of the
security team.
However, it *ought* to be part of Debian, and indeed, it now is IIUC.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
It's clear to me we need a virtual package for pgp implementation
that both pgp and gnupg can provide.
Uh, this doesn't work. Even the PGP
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:02:47AM -0600, Hubert Chan wrote:
Well, obviously my proposed scheme wouldn't work (because of the
previously mentioned exploit), but the motivation behind the scheme
was to reduce the number of SUID programs (because if you don't need
it to be SUID, you're safer
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 07:13:26PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But for the situation we are talking about, they would need to have the
same interface, since a PGP front end needs to interact with the PGP
program. So in the PGP front end
What's the best way to go about writing an Acceptable Use Policy for
networks?
My searches for information have come up empty so if anyone has any links,
they would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Leonard Leblanc
Vice-president - Technology
www.emergeknowledge.com
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it.
Ah, one thing, I use vim and mutt, how could I wrap the lines at 72
characters?
Thank you.
Bien tios, gracias por todo. Me gusta el ingles y estoy intentando aprenderlo.
Ah, una cosa, uso vim y mutt, ¿como podría cortar las
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
one thing, I use vim and mutt, how could I wrap the lines at 72
characters? Thank you.
:set wm=8
:set ai
that normally does it for me.
~Tim
--
17:36:33 up 6 days, 21:40, 13 users, load
Yoros,
I pulled this off of the Mutt list [http://www.mutt.org]
mutt-users@mutt.org
Put this in your .muttrc config file
set editor=vim -c 'set textwidth=72'
OR add the following to your .vimrc config file:
set the textwidth to 72 characters for replies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian == Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Florian Eh, software which provides the 'editor' virtual package *has*
Florian a consistent command line interface. The user interfaces are
(If I may add my own clarification) a somewhat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas == Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas No, you're wrong. The mailcrypt front end, for example, works
Thomas with both. And that's the case we are talking about.
OK, so it'll work for now. But you run the (unnecessary,
* Tim Haynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010621 16:39]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn it. Ah,
one thing, I use vim and mutt, how could I wrap the lines at 72
characters? Thank you.
:set wm=8
:set ai
that normally does it for me.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yoros == yoros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
yoros Ok guys, thanks for all. I like english and I'm trying to learn
yoros it.
You *like* English? (By the way, in English, language names are
capitalized.) What are you, some kind of masochist?
(word
From Florian Weimer on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
It's clear to me we need a virtual package for pgp implementation
that both pgp and gnupg can provide.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 +0100
Brett Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use XEmacs instead of Emacs and kill the need for this
package?
Unfortunately there's a lot of elisp that just won't work under one
of the two. I finally gave up and evicted all the GNU/Emacs crap
from my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph == Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper
(well, because then it wouldn't be a _virtual_ package, but ignoring
that...)
Joseph script (e.g. dpgpw for 'Debian PGP Wrapper')
Good, good, good. I know, thank you.
--
yoros
pgplZOSySvKRS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph == Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper
(well, because then it wouldn't be a _virtual_ package, but ignoring
that...)
Heh. How
You can take a look at this AUP, and you might even want to take a look at
*spits* AOL's *spits* AUP as well. I haven't looked at theirs, but I've read
over ours several times.
http://www.earthlink.net/about/policies/use/index.html
and up one level has several different public policies we have
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And if I can add, packages that provide the virtual packages such as
info-browser or mail-reader don't have a consistent command-line
interface, but this isn't the interface that matters.
If we talk about a pgp front end, the interface that matters is
Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So why not create in the virtual package an actual wrapper script (e.g.
dpgpw for 'Debian PGP Wrapper') that detects the version of pgp or gpg
or whatever is installed on the system (or chooses which one to
use if multiple pgp implementations
From Hubert Chan on Thursday, 21 June, 2001:
Joseph == Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
below). Although if you volunteer to make it happen... :-)
Hubert Changing all the packages to work properly wouldn't be a simple
Hubert task. (Not saying that it's a bad idea, though.)
Joseph Aside
Hello,
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Is there any known reason for this choice ?
signature
Grégoire
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:52:50PM +0200, Gregoire Welraeds wrote:
Hello,
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Gregoire Welraeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have recently installed a basic potato on a PII. While playing a little bit
around a find that the provided nmap was only a 2.12 version. It is a rather
old version of nmap (I have a 2.53 installed on a SuSE 6.3).
Is there any known reason for
Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
2.2r2) may fix some serious breakage as well, but that's about it.
Tim Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
The reason is called 'stable' ;-)
Debian does not put new versions into stable. It just allows security
fixes to be made to it. Okay, ocassionally a new upgrade (e.g. 2.2r1 to
2.2r2) may fix some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf == Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
Olaf environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
Olaf secure box where I am the one and only normal user, but that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph == Joseph Pingenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joseph 0) Application calls, say, pgp with pgp syntax.
Joseph 1) A pgp-xlat package (?), maintained by the PGP person, is used
Joseph to translate the pgp commandline to the generic
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf == Olaf Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olaf On a really secure box I wouldn't want to have the build
Olaf environment needed to do this. Perhaps on another reasonably
Olaf secure box where I am the one and only normal user, but that's
Olaf
46 matches
Mail list logo
