Re: Bug#684293: Info received (Bug#684293: root cause of mount hang in installer [kernel bug])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11.08.2012 21:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for the additional information you have supplied > regarding this Bug report. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your > message has been received. > > Your

Re: bug report to icedove or iceweasel??

On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:51:59 -0400, Whit Hansell wrote: > On 08/03/2012 11:38 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> Have you tried any of these? >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/07/msg02133.html (...) >> With no more tests on your side, report it against the MUA (Icedove) >> which is that fails.

Re: bug report to icedove or iceweasel??

On 08/03/2012 11:38 AM, Camaleón wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:19:18 -0400, Whit Hansell wrote: > > (please, no html posts here, thanks) > >> Needing to send in bug report as I cannot find the answer to this >> specific problem. As explained before, I can get to Iceweasel from >> Icedove when

Re: bug kde 4.8.4

Am Samstag, 4. August 2012 schrieb Camaleón: > On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:14:16 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Freitag, 3. August 2012 schrieb Camaleón: > >> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:20:48 -0600, alex wrote: > >> > bug KDE 4.8.4 DEBIAN SID august-02-2012 > >> > >> (...) > >> > >> Bug reports

Re: bug kde 4.8.4

On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:14:16 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Freitag, 3. August 2012 schrieb Camaleón: >> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:20:48 -0600, alex wrote: >> > bug KDE 4.8.4 DEBIAN SID august-02-2012 >> >> (...) >> >> Bug reports have to be filed at Debian BTS: >> >> http://www.debian.org

Re: bug kde 4.8.4

Am Freitag, 3. August 2012 schrieb Camaleón: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:20:48 -0600, alex wrote: > > bug KDE 4.8.4 DEBIAN SID august-02-2012 > > (...) > > Bug reports have to be filed at Debian BTS: > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/index.en.html CC´ing to sub...@bugs.debian.org should have done th

Re: bug kde 4.8.4

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:20:48 -0600, alex wrote: > bug KDE 4.8.4 DEBIAN SID august-02-2012 (...) Bug reports have to be filed at Debian BTS: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/index.en.html Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: bug report to icedove or iceweasel??

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:19:18 -0400, Whit Hansell wrote: (please, no html posts here, thanks) > Needing to send in bug report as I cannot find the answer to this > specific problem. As explained before, I can get to Iceweasel from > Icedove when I click on a link but I can only get to my homepage

Re: bug report to icedove or iceweasel??

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:19:18AM -0400, Whit Hansell wrote: >Needing to send in bug report as I cannot find the answer to this specific >problem.  As explained before, I can get to Iceweasel from Icedove when I >click on a link but I can only get to my homepage.  I have changed >h

Re: Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 26.07.2012 15:34, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > Any idea as to when/if they'll actually get MATE into a real > Debian repository? Until then I won't be trying it. Not in near future :(. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658783 - -- M

Re: Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:07:08 +0300 Mika Suomalainen wrote: > On 25.07.2012 19:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:55 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > >>> If you liked GNOME2, you must try MATE :). > > Ok, I'll take a look if there are maintained "packages" or "builds" > > for

Re: Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:07 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > On 25.07.2012 19:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:55 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > >>> If you liked GNOME2, you must try MATE :). > > Ok, I'll take a look if there are maintained "packages" or "builds" > > for Debia

Re: Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 25.07.2012 19:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:55 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: >>> If you liked GNOME2, you must try MATE :). > Ok, I'll take a look if there are maintained "packages" or "builds" > for Debian, Ubuntu, Arch and

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:32:37 -0400, Doug wrote: > On 07/25/2012 10:34 AM, Camaleón wrote: (...) > I can't resist answering this: Don't do that! --doug Mmm... Doug, careful when quoting ;-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On 07/25/2012 10:34 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:13:00 +0100, Ludovic Tolhurst-Cleaver wrote: I'm trying to decide if and how to report a possible bug in Debian. I'm running Wheezy (actually it calls itself wheezy/sid when I switch to tty1 etc.) on a 64-bit Toshiba Satellite Pro

Re: Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:55 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > If you liked GNOME2, you must try MATE :). Ok, I'll take a look if there are maintained "packages" or "builds" for Debian, Ubuntu, Arch and soon or later Suse too. Thanx, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d

Re: Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 25.07.2012 18:51, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I'm tired to test everything, but please, report about MATE :). > Perhaps, I'm willing to use MATE too. In my opinion, this is just like GNOME2. One panel up, one down, widgets can be added on both panels,

Mate - Was: Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:42 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > This is one reason why I use MATE. I'm tired to test everything, but please, report about MATE :). Perhaps, I'm willing to use MATE too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:42:35 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > On 25.07.2012 16:28, Gaël DONVAL wrote: >> I guess this is the gnome 3's error screen that logs you out if >> "something" "wrong" happens... or not. >> >> > And which sometimes can be quit with ALT+F4. > > I always get that error whe

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 25.07.2012 16:28, Gaël DONVAL wrote: > I guess this is the gnome 3's error screen that logs you out if > "something" "wrong" happens... or not. > And which sometimes can be quit with ALT+F4. I always get that error when trying to login with GN

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:13:00 +0100, Ludovic Tolhurst-Cleaver wrote: > I'm trying to decide if and how to report a possible bug in Debian. > > I'm running Wheezy (actually it calls itself wheezy/sid when I switch to > tty1 etc.) on a 64-bit Toshiba Satellite Pro A300D laptop with an Intel > Core2D

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

> I can't say I'm aware of this image, I guess this is the gnome 3's error screen that logs you out if "something" "wrong" happens... or not. > Do you, perhaps have one of these dual-mode graphics cards on that > laptop? Should be a radeon 3100. But I can be wrong. What driver are you using? A f

Re: bug report?: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:13:00PM +0100, Ludovic Tolhurst-Cleaver wrote: > Dear Fellow Debian Users, > > I'm trying to decide if and how to report a possible bug in Debian. > > I'm running Wheezy (actually it calls itself wheezy/sid when I switch > to tty1 etc.) on a 64-bit Toshiba Satellite Pro

Re: Bug query: USB Keyboard random repeats

On 16/07/12 15:52, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Lu, 16 iul 12, 11:27:52, Steve Brumby wrote: How can I log a bug with Keyboard USB? With Debian Squeezy (arm) on the Raspberry Pi and Raspbian the keyboard gets random repeats, but with Archlinuxarm no problems. As there's no problems with exactly the

Re: Bug query: USB Keyboard random repeats

Hello Steve Brumby, Am 2012-07-16 11:27:52, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > How can I log a bug with Keyboard USB? > > With Debian Squeezy (arm) on the Raspberry Pi and Raspbian the keyboard > gets random repeats, but with Archlinuxarm no problems. > As there's no problems with exactly the same

Re: Bug query: USB Keyboard random repeats

On Lu, 16 iul 12, 11:27:52, Steve Brumby wrote: > How can I log a bug with Keyboard USB? > > With Debian Squeezy (arm) on the Raspberry Pi and Raspbian the keyboard > gets random repeats, but with Archlinuxarm no problems. > As there's no problems with exactly the same hardware configuration with

Re: Bug query: USB Keyboard random repeats

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:27:52 +0200, Steve Brumby wrote: (please, no html posts... thanks) > How can I log a bug with Keyboard USB? > > With Debian Squeezy (arm) on the Raspberry Pi and Raspbian the keyboard > gets random repeats, but with Archlinuxarm no problems. As there's no > problems with e

Re: Bug#673936: System hangs on start : NFS shares fails and returns timeouts since

Hello, So as we've found out, the problem is caused by mountnfs script not expecting --all. This can be temporarily fixed by adding this: [ "$ADDRFAM" = "inet" ] || [ "$ADDRFAM" = "inet6" ] || exit 0 just after '[ "$IFACE" != "lo" ] || exit 0' into /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs. This is going to

Re: Bug in logwatch? (not all archives are checked and --logdir is partially ignored).

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:12:43 +0200, Maarten Derickx wrote: > 2012/4/29 Maarten Derickx > > >> A closer inspection of the logfiles I cared about revealed that there >> where also related errors. I made a patch with all the changes and >> posted it at http://pastebin.com/6vALKDYN . What is the pr

Re: Bug in logwatch? (not all archives are checked and --logdir is partially ignored).

2012/4/29 Maarten Derickx > > A closer inspection of the logfiles I cared about revealed that there where > also related errors. I made a patch with all the changes and posted it at > http://pastebin.com/6vALKDYN . What is the procedure for getting these fixes > in debian? > > > Thanks, > Maar

Re: Bug in logwatch? (not all archives are checked and --logdir is partially ignored).

Maarten Derickx wrote: > A closer inspection of the logfiles I cared about revealed that there > where also related errors. I made a patch with all the changes and > posted it at http://pastebin.com/6vALKDYN . What is the procedure for > getting these fixes in debian? Report it as a bug. Using 'r

Re: Bug in logwatch? (not all archives are checked and --logdir is partially ignored).

> Look at one of the config files that manages sshd (secure.conf), I think > there can be a rule pattern definition error there. > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón Thanks. There where no config files in /etc/ (only a directory structure). But indeed there was a mistake in the file in /usr/share/logw

Re: Bug in logwatch? (not all archives are checked and --logdir is partially ignored).

On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:39:08 +0200, Maarten Derickx wrote: (...) → About the problem of analyzing from the archive > The strange thing is that when I do: > > logwatch --service sshd --archives > > I get only 3 logins 2 from "mderickx" and 1 from "sageslave". (see > Output 1 below) (...) > Th

Re: Bug in source package nvidia-settings

On Vi, 30 mar 12, 10:26:56, Marwan Abd Ellah wrote: > Hi there, > I want to submit a bug report concerning the nv-control library. Please use 'reportbug nvidia-settings' (Severity: whishlist). Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.de

Re: Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Lennart Weller wrote: >> Am 28.03.2012 01:01, schrieb Ben Hutchings: >>> >>> Since you've accepted as fact that this software infringes those >>> patents, it looks like you're about to violate item 1 of

Re: Bug#666010: ITP: nvidia-texture-tools -- image processing and texture manipulation tools

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Lennart Weller wrote: > Am 28.03.2012 01:01, schrieb Ben Hutchings: >> >> Since you've accepted as fact that this software infringes those >> patents, it looks like you're about to violate item 1 of the Debian >> patent policy. >> >> Ben. >> > S3TC is not actively

Re: bug report request for advice

On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:22:27 -0800, David Christensen wrote: > On 03/07/2012 04:10 AM, Camaleón wrote: > > Fine, but for the next time don't be lazy and reply each user > separately, on its own thread>;-) > > 1. That scatters the conversation. On the contrary, it helps to keep the thread in a

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:23:13 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote: > " > Can you tell why are you using apt-listbugs to get the updates? I mean, > "apt-get upgrade" should manage that for you, right? :-) " > > With apt-get upgrade, I would have installed even the update with a > grave bug, that was my lo

Re: bug report request for advice

On 03/07/2012 02:17 AM, Brian wrote: From http://localhost/printers. When I browse http://localhost/printers, I see: Not Found The requested URL /printers was not found on this server. Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) Server at localhost Port 80 Note that Apache is installed (via apt-get)

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

" Can you tell why are you using apt-listbugs to get the updates? I mean, "apt-get upgrade" should manage that for you, right? :-) " With apt-get upgrade, I would have installed even the update with a grave bug, that was my logic. Is there a way to exclude packages with this command? " Don't wo

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:27:59 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote: > Hi Camaleon > > Update > > I have realised that there was another error reported once I was > refusing to try checking bug reports again: > > E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 (...) Can you tell why are

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

Hi Camaleon I am reading your latest reply after I sent you another message, where I seem to have partially solved the problem. You may want to have a look at it anyway, it has a transcript of my console too. Thanks again! Pier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

Hi Camaleon Update I have realised that there was another error reported once I was refusing to try checking bug reports again: E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 I have decided to go manual, after reading this post: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=484

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:28:36 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote: > Hi Camaleon > > Apologies for my late reply, I would expect for any reply to my original > post to reach my mailbox, but it doesn't... You had some replies :-? > As I replied to Hugo, I have tried: > " > root@pier:/home/pier# apt-list

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

Hi Camaleon Apologies for my late reply, I would expect for any reply to my original post to reach my mailbox, but it doesn't... As I replied to Hugo, I have tried: " root@pier:/home/pier# apt-listbugs list mono-apache-server Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrievin

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

> I only get that with apt-listbugs. > > Hugo > > Hi Hugo Actually I have tried apt-listbugs: " root@pier:/home/pier# apt-listbugs list mono-apache-server Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done " It se

Re: bug report request for advice

On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:53:05 -0800, David Christensen wrote: > debian-user: > > Thanks for the replies. :-) Fine, but for the next time don't be lazy and reply each user separately, on its own thread >;-) > Camaleón wrote: > > Can you print the said pages with another PDF viewer or is just >

Re: bug report request for advice

On Tue 06 Mar 2012 at 17:53:05 -0800, David Christensen wrote: > > You sohuld try and pin down what printer driver you are using. > > How do I determine what printer driver my system is using? >From http://localhost/printers. > > But also consider that I *think* when evince prints it's relying o

Re: bug report request for advice

debian-user: Thanks for the replies. :-) Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > I guess that is evince. Help -> About says: About Document Viewer Document Viewer 2.30.3 Document Viewer Using poppler/cairo (0.12.4) (c) 1996-2009 The Evince authors http://www.

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:44:39 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote: > Many thanks Camaleon. > > Very much likely it's me, I'm a newbie ;-) This is not transient as I've > been trying daily for the past few days. Also, apt-get install works > with some application, but doesn't with others. > I am on a temp

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

Unfortunately in my case it consistently stops at the same point: not able to retrieve bug reports... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330962610.2400.1

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

Unfortunately not. It only gives me a chance to try again retrieving bug reports. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330962513.2400.9.camel@pier

Re: Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

Many thanks Camaleon. Very much likely it's me, I'm a newbie ;-) This is not transient as I've been trying daily for the past few days. Also, apt-get install works with some application, but doesn't with others. I am on a temporary accommodation at the moment, with wireless only access to internet

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

pierpaolo pilla wrote: Hi I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with apt-get-install): " Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error message: W: HTTPClient::KeepAliveDisconnected It co

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

pierpaolo pilla, 4.03.2012: > Hi > > I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update > manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with > apt-get-install): > " > Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error > message: > W: HTTPClient::KeepA

Re: Bug in both update manager and in apt-get

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:48:14 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote: > I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update > manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with > apt-get-install): > " > Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error > message:

Re: bug report request for advice

Hi, I'm no expert about this, but some suggestions to hopefully point you in the right direction at reporting this... On 24/02/12 06:28, David Christensen wrote: debian-user: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting states: "If you are unable to determine which package your bug report shou

Re: Bug reporting

On Jo, 02 feb 12, 07:42:46, Rob Owens wrote: > > > If you tell reportbug that you do not have an smtp server, it will use a > Debian smtp server. My .reportbugrc has this line: > > smtphost reportbug.debian.org +1 for this method. I know the wording is not very... obvious, but read the message

Re: Bug reporting

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:38:37 -0800, Gary Roach wrote: > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a bug > report successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no mail > server active on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to setup exim > several times and have alw

Re: Bug reporting

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:38:37PM -0800, Gary Roach wrote: > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a > bug report successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no > mail server active on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to > setup exim several times and hav

Re: Bug reporting

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:38:37 -0800 Gary Roach wrote: > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a bug > report successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no mail > server active on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to setup exim > several times and have

Re: Bug reporting

* On 2012 01 Feb 17:04 -0600, Gary Roach wrote: > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a > bug report successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no > mail server active on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to > setup exim several times and have always giv

Re: Bug reporting

Gary Roach wrote: > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a > bug report successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no > mail server active on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to > setup exim several times and have always given up in disgust. The > instru

Re: Bug reporting

Gary Roach wrote at 2012-02-01 15:38 -0600: > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a > bug report successfully. One of the main problems is that I have no > mail server active on my system. I use Icedove. You should be able to just use reportbug's SMTP options with cred

Re: Bug reporting

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Gary Roach wrote: > > I've been using Debian for years and still can't seem to submit a bug report > successfully.  One of the main problems is that I have no mail server active > on my system. I use Icedove. I have tried to setup exim several times and > have alway

Re: Bug#655999: [bugs.debian.org] Reporting documentation - "What package does your bug report belong to?" points to user support groups

On Du, 15 ian 12, 14:35:17, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > debian-user's topic is user support. > > For technical discussions about development, the default group is > debian-de...@lists.debian.org. > Reference: > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/Reporting.wml?r1=1.18&r2=

Re: bug report

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:45:27 -0800, Vivian wrote: > Package manager > > E: Encountered a section with no Package: header > E: Problem with MergeList > /var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_lenny_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages > E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed o

Re: bug report

On 13/01/12 11:45, Vivian wrote: > Package manager > > E: Encountered a section with no Package: header > E: Problem with MergeList > /var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_lenny_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages > > E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. > E: _c

Re: bug on which package ?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:36:06 +0100, r.3 wrote: > I found a bug in debian wheezy : > panel > places > connect to a server > secured webdav (HTTPS) If I fill > the field "login" it does not work, but it works if I do not fill it > here, but wait the next window to do so. I would like to report it, b

Re: bug on which package ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2012 04:36 PM, r...@libertysurf.fr wrote: > Hello, > I found a bug in debian wheezy : > panel > places > connect to a server > secured webdav (HTTPS) > If I fill the field "login" it does not work, but it works if I do not fill > it here, bu

Re: Bug with network printer setup in Gnome 3?

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:19:40 +, Andrew Wood wrote: > Is there a bug with adding a new network printer (IPP) in Gnome 3 > because I am unable to do it in both Fedora 15 (Gnome 3.0) Fedora 16 > (Gnome 3.2) and Wheezy (Gnome 3.0). > There seems to always have been a bug that prevented you from ad

Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s

That's a great idea, like that if something goes wrong I can still reboot and everything is back to normal. I will give it a go... - Original Message - From: Camaleón To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 5:25 PM Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup -

Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:41:47 -0700, ML mail wrote: > Thanks for your reply. Reading the link you provided it looks like that > adding "acpi=ht noapic" as boot options to the kernel via grub solves > this problem or at least for one person. I would like to give it at try > but was now wondering whe

Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s

wo options? Can I add them in /etc/grub/defaults like that: GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN="dom0_mem=1024M noreboot acpi=ht noapic" run grub-update and reboot ? Regards, ML  - Original Message - From: Camaleón To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:59 PM Su

Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:24:36 -0700, ML mail wrote: > I am running Debian 6.0 amd64 on a Dell PowerEdge 2850 server with 16 GB > RAM for virtualization purposes using Debian's Xen packages. Today when > I wanted to create a new VPS using xen-create-image I got really slow > and everthing sort of fr

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

Sven Joachim wrote: On 2011-10-16 19:11 +0200, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Dear maintainers, I still have significant slow reactions of X when I am using xserver-xorg- core-1.11-1-amd64 with nvidia-glx. This is pointing me to #Bug641344, which is already closed. Sadly I can

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

On 2011-10-16 19:11 +0200, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: >> Dear maintainers, >> >> I still have significant slow reactions of X when I am using xserver-xorg- >> core-1.11-1-amd64 with nvidia-glx. This is pointing me to >> #Bug641344, which is already closed. Sadly I cannot see

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Dear maintainers, I still have significant slow reactions of X when I am using xserver-xorg- core-1.11-1-amd64 with nvidia-glx. This is pointing me to #Bug641344, which is already closed. Sadly I cannot see any improvement on my machine, although, I have to admit, it is

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:15:52 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Dear maintainers, Maintainers? Here? Where? ;-) > I still have significant slow reactions of X when I am using > xserver-xorg- core-1.11-1-amd64 with nvidia-glx. This is pointing me to > #Bug641344, which is already closed. Sadly I can

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

On Sat 15 Oct 2011 at 20:53:31 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Am Samstag, 15. Oktober 2011 schrieb Brian: > > On Sat 15 Oct 2011 at 20:15:52 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > > Dear maintainers, > > > > If they are all listening you will be very fortunate. :-) > I hope, there will be at least on

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

> Again, this is not the place to make such requests, but it would be > wrong. #641344 was about crashes due to a missing extension ABI bump > and has been fixed in Xserver 1.11.1. > Ok, Sven, I just didn't want to make too much noise, as I didn't know, what was really the reason for this bug.

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

On 2011-10-15 20:15 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Dear maintainers, This is the user list, read by not too many maintainers. > I still have significant slow reactions of X when I am using xserver-xorg- > core-1.11-1-amd64 with nvidia-glx. This is pointing me to #Bug641344, which > is > alre

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

Am Samstag, 15. Oktober 2011 schrieb Brian: > On Sat 15 Oct 2011 at 20:15:52 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Dear maintainers, > > If they are all listening you will be very fortunate. :-) I hope, there will be at least one, and I guess, in fact there are a lot of them reading here, but will no

Re: #Bug 641344 - should it be reopened?

On Sat 15 Oct 2011 at 20:15:52 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Dear maintainers, If they are all listening you will be very fortunate. :-) > I still have significant slow reactions of X when I am using xserver-xorg- > core-1.11-1-amd64 with nvidia-glx. This is pointing me to #Bug641344, which

Re: bug help (Wheezy kernel 3 and alsa problem)

On 08/10/11 21:57, Richard wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:56:10 +1100 Scott Ferguson > wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Scott >> On 08/10/11 20:10, Richard wrote: >> Of no particular relevance - what kernel is that? (did you build >> it yourself?). > > No it the real time low latency kernel >

Re: bug help (Wheezy kernel 3 and alsa problem)

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:56:10 +1100 Scott Ferguson wrote: Thanks for the reply Scott > On 08/10/11 20:10, Richard wrote: > > Hi, I could mark the title with OT , then I may get some help. > > :-) > > Although a subject of linux-kernel-3.0 and alsa might help (many of us > only download headers).

Re: bug help (Wheezy kernel 3 and alsa problem)

On 08/10/11 20:10, Richard wrote: > Hi, I could mark the title with OT , then I may get some help. :-) Although a subject of linux-kernel-3.0 and alsa might help (many of us only download headers). > I'm using wheezy with the 2.6.33RT kernel at the moment Of no particular relevance - what kerne

Re: Bug#636123: Info received (Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem not recognised -> new bug report)

On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 04:44 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > right - _finally_ i've encountered a requirement to upgrade a 2nd > system that has lvm2 and (in this 2nd case 2.6.18-486) a linux kernel > image, and have encountered the *exact* same problem as is in bugs > 636123 and 638896

Re: Bug#636123: Info received (Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem not recognised -> new bug report)

right - _finally_ i've encountered a requirement to upgrade a 2nd system that has lvm2 and (in this 2nd case 2.6.18-486) a linux kernel image, and have encountered the *exact* same problem as is in bugs 636123 and 638896. this time, however, i was anticipating that something might go wrong, so was

Re: bug debian reboot freezing from Intel Atom absent keyboard bus when calling reset this bus

On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 01:42:57 +0200, vprint wrote: > Debian have bug on restart "reboot" in call reset keyboard bus procedure > for mainboard on Intel ATOM 525. Mainboard with Atom 525 with N10 > chipset absent keyboard bus, and call reset this bus causes freezing. > Pls make fix for this bug and g

Re: Bug report

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Javier Silva wrote: > 2011/10/4 lina : > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Javier Silva wrote: > >> > >> 2011/10/4 Erwan David : > >> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:10:39AM CEST, Javier Silva > >> > said: > >> >> 2011/10/3 Erwan David > >> >> > > >> >> > O

Re: Bug report

2011/10/4 lina : > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Javier Silva wrote: >> >> 2011/10/4 Erwan David : >> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:10:39AM CEST, Javier Silva >> > said: >> >> 2011/10/3 Erwan David >> >> > >> >> > On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote: >> >> > > Just curious, >> >> > > >> >> > > do

Re: Bug report

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Javier Silva wrote: > 2011/10/4 Erwan David : > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:10:39AM CEST, Javier Silva < > fjsil...@gmail.com> said: > >> 2011/10/3 Erwan David > >> > > >> > On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote: > >> > > Just curious, > >> > > > >> > > do I need to file

Re: Bug report

2011/10/4 Erwan David : > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:10:39AM CEST, Javier Silva > said: >> 2011/10/3 Erwan David >> > >> > On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote: >> > > Just curious, >> > > >> > > do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and >> > > xserver? >> > > >> > > I gue

Re: Bug report

On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:10:39AM CEST, Javier Silva said: > 2011/10/3 Erwan David > > > > On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote: > > > Just curious, > > > > > > do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and > > > xserver? > > > > > > I guess they notice, so they removed fglrx

Re: Bug report

Why can't install two versions xorg or xserver-xorg? sometimes used this one, another situation used another one, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Javier Silva wrote: > 2011/10/3 Erwan David > > > > On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote: > > > Just curious, > > > > > > do I need to file a bug report

Re: Bug report

2011/10/3 Erwan David > > On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote: > > Just curious, > > > > do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and > > xserver? > > > > I guess they notice, so they removed fglrx driver from testing. > > > > How do people survive without fglrx driver. > > >

Re: Bug report

2011/10/4 Johan Grönqvist > 2011-10-03 18:39, lina skrev: > > Just curious, >> >> do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and >> xserver? >> > > No, see . Thanks. > > Last comment on that bug: > > > is it because of this that fglrx just

Re: Bug report

2011-10-03 18:39, lina skrev: Just curious, do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and xserver? No, see . Last comment on that bug: > is it because of this that fglrx just got removed from testing, Yes. How do people survive withou

Re: Bug report

Just curious, do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and xserver? I guess they notice, so they removed fglrx driver from testing. How do people survive without fglrx driver. I failed to downgrade the xserver, so I degraded myself watching films lots. Feel terribl

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >