Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> Wednesday, May 24, 2000, 1:27:53 PM, Keith wrote:
> >> One downside of vim that I just remembered, be careful the need for
> >> slamming the ESC key. Windows likes to think it means "shut this window
> >> NOW!"
> >> and if you have the confirmation turned off you lose m
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > The problem I see in 5.3 is less subtle.
> >
> > It will mess up this:
> >
> > $whatever =~ /thingiem/;
> >
> > Thinks the 'm/' is the beginning of a match and colorizes it, messing up
> > subsequent lines as well!
>
> Doesn't happen here.
>
> Pack
Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> The problem I see in 5.3 is less subtle.
>
> It will mess up this:
>
> $whatever =~ /thingiem/;
>
> Thinks the 'm/' is the beginning of a match and colorizes it, messing up
> subsequent lines as well!
Doesn't happen here.
Package: vim
Version: 5.6.012-1
--
see shy j
Wednesday, May 24, 2000, 1:27:53 PM, Keith wrote:
>> One downside of vim that I just remembered, be careful the need for
>> slamming the ESC key. Windows likes to think it means "shut this window
>> NOW!"
>> and if you have the confirmation turned off you lose messages in your Windows
>> emai
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 2:23:00 PM, Viktor wrote:
> Does VIM include color syntax highlighting on the console? I skimmed
> over the VIM-HOWTO, but I could only manage to get color syntax
> highlighting in gvim.
Yes, it does.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrin
Sean wrote:
>
> Frank Mehnert wrote:
>
> > I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is syntax
> > highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a small and fast editor in
> > Debian with that feature built in?
>
> VIM
Does VIM include color syntax highlighting on the console?
Steve Lamb wrote:
[cut]
> The /only/ perl construct I know of that doesn't work is
> something like this:
>
> if ($foo =~ /bar\/blam/){
> }
>
The problem I see in 5.3 is less subtle.
It will mess up this:
$whatever =~ /thingiem/;
Thinks the 'm/' is the beginning of a match and colorizes it, mes
Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
[cut]
>
> Hey, no problem here with highlighting that code snippet using
>
> VIM - Vi IMproved 5.6 (2000 Jan 16, compiled Feb 10 2000 17:28:27)
> (official wichert debian package)
>
Hey, where can I get that? The one from frozen (vim-perl 5.6.070-1, vim
compiled May 1)
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Shao Zhang hat gesagt: // Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> > The worst case that I have seen in vim, is the multiline regexp
> > with quotes in it. And it is even worse if I only want to match
> > the beginning quote. See example below:
> >
Shao Zhang hat gesagt: // Shao Zhang wrote:
> The worst case that I have seen in vim, is the multiline regexp
> with quotes in it. And it is even worse if I only want to match
> the beginning quote. See example below:
>
> $hello =~ s{
> \"hello world
>
Hi,
The worst case that I have seen in vim, is the multiline regexp
with quotes in it. And it is even worse if I only want to match
the beginning quote. See example below:
$hello =~ s{
\"hello world
}{
hello
Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> This leads to a question I've been interested in. I've noticed vim's
> Perl syntax highlighting to be, hmmm, not always what it should be. (As
> some have said, only perl can parse Perl). Any opinions on which editor
> has the *best* Perl syntax highlighting?
IMHO, vim.
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Not to mention I fail to see how Emacs got into the discussion of "Simple
> Text Editor..." Lisp interpreters with dillusions of OShood doesn't meet any
> of those three words.
Fox X I would use Nedit. Very easy to use and great highlighting. Actually,
this is
the only o
on 5/23/00 1:49 PM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 10:46:21 AM, John wrote:
>> Saying emacs isn't a text editor is like saying that a Leatherman isn't a
>> pocket knife -- it may be literally true, but is extremely misleading in
>> fact.
>
> Hey, don't tell me.
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 10:46:21 AM, John wrote:
> Have you perhaps never used emacs?
I have.
> Saying emacs isn't a text editor is like saying that a Leatherman isn't a
> pocket knife -- it may be literally true, but is extremely misleading in
> fact.
Hey, don't tell me. Tell all the Em
on 5/23/00 1:37 PM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right, because were are still on simple editor. Again, I fail to see how
> Emacs qualifies since it isn't simple nor is it a text editor.
(Please note that I changed the subject line a couple messages back, to
remove the 'simple'.)
Ha
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 10:21:36 AM, Frank wrote:
> Hey, no problem here with highlighting that code snippet using
> VIM - Vi IMproved 5.6 (2000 Jan 16, compiled Feb 10 2000 17:28:27)
> (official wichert debian package)
Hmmm. I guess I'm just set in my ways because...
work:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 8:41:46 AM, John wrote:
> Go back and read the text you snipped. The question got changed to "text
> editor with best Perl syntax highlighting", without a concomitant change in
> subject line. (X)Emacs certainly qualifies, despite it's editing functions
> being only a subset
Steve Lamb hat gesagt: // Steve Lamb wrote:
> Vim. I've not seen a problem with its highlighting that didn't also
> improve the readability of my code when I got in the habit of getting it to
> colorize right. The /only/ perl construct I know of that doesn't work is
> something like this:
>
>> (X)Emacs with CPerl mode.
>
> Even that's not, hmmm, what it should be. Cases that come to mind are
> certain regular expressions and here documents. Unless I've been
> using a different Perl mode in Emacs.
I haven't noticed any issues, but I don't make huge usage of here documents,
and I te
on 5/23/00 11:28 AM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not to mention I fail to see how Emacs got into the discussion of "Simple
> Text Editor..." Lisp interpreters with dillusions of OShood doesn't meet any
> of those three words.
Go back and read the text you snipped. The question got c
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 7:39:16 AM, Jesse wrote:
>> (X)Emacs with CPerl mode.
> Even that's not, hmmm, what it should be. Cases that come to mind are
> certain regular expressions and here documents. Unless I've been
> using a different Perl mode in Emacs.
Not to mention I fail to see how Em
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 6:57:22 AM, Keith wrote:
> This leads to a question I've been interested in. I've noticed vim's
> Perl syntax highlighting to be, hmmm, not always what it should be. (As
> some have said, only perl can parse Perl). Any opinions on which editor
> has the *best* Perl syntax
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 09:39:16AM -0500, Jesse Jacobsen wrote:
> On 05/23/00, John S Jacobs Anderson addressed "Re: Simple Text Editor with
> Synatx highlighting?":
> > on 5/23/00 9:57 AM, Keith G. Murphy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > This leads to a question
How about fte (fte-console or fte under x)??
Ron Rademaker
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Jesse Jacobsen wrote:
> On 05/23/00, John S Jacobs Anderson addressed "Re: Simple Text Editor with
> Synatx highlighting?":
> > on 5/23/00 9:57 AM, Keith G. Murphy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/23/00, John S Jacobs Anderson addressed "Re: Simple Text Editor with
Synatx highlighting?":
> on 5/23/00 9:57 AM, Keith G. Murphy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This leads to a question I've been interested in. I've noticed vim's
> > Perl syntax h
on 5/23/00 9:57 AM, Keith G. Murphy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This leads to a question I've been interested in. I've noticed vim's
> Perl syntax highlighting to be, hmmm, not always what it should be. (As
> some have said, only perl can parse Perl). Any opinions on which editor
> has the *be
I may get flamed for this lol, but i've always used mcedit for perl
stuff, pretty perl colour highlighting :)
Peter.
"Keith G. Murphy" wrote:
>
> Richard Klinda wrote:
> >
> > Hoi Frank, ALL!
> >
> > Frank> I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is
> > Frank> syntax highlig
Richard Klinda wrote:
>
> Hoi Frank, ALL!
>
> Frank> I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is
> Frank> syntax highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a
> Frank> small and fast editor in Debian with that feature built in?
>
> fte, vim, jed (emacs ;-))
>
This lea
On 23 May 2000, Philip Lehman wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2000, Armin Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Use vim. It's hard to learn, but it is worse it.
>
> Interesting typo ;)
>
> (I'm writing this as a non-native speaker, no offence intended)
>
> --
> Philip Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
V
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Armin Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Use vim. It's hard to learn, but it is worse it.
Interesting typo ;)
(I'm writing this as a non-native speaker, no offence intended)
--
Philip Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use vim. It's hard to learn, but it is worse it. It's fast.
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 08:59:56PM +0200, Richard Klinda wrote:
> Hoi Frank, ALL!
>
> Frank> I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is
> Frank> syntax highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a
> Frank> small and fast editor in Debian with that feature built in?
>
>
Hoi Frank, ALL!
Frank> I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is
Frank> syntax highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a
Frank> small and fast editor in Debian with that feature built in?
fte, vim, jed (emacs ;-))
--
ignotus
Monday, May 22, 2000, 8:36:38 AM, Frank wrote:
> I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is syntax
> highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a small and fast editor in
> Debian with that feature built in?
I'd highly recommend vim. I was die-hard set against any vi or
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Frank Mehnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is syntax
>highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a small and fast
>editor in Debian with that feature built in?
jed?
--
Philip Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frank Mehnert wrote:
> I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is syntax
> highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a small and fast editor in
> Debian with that feature built in?
VIM
Hi,
I'm using joe for many purposes. The only feature I miss is syntax
highlighting in C. Are there any hints for such a small and fast editor in
Debian with that feature built in?
Frank
--
Frank Mehnert
## Dept. of Computer Science, Dresden University of Technology, Germany ##
## E-Mail: [EMAIL
38 matches
Mail list logo
