On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:51:28AM -0400, William Cooper wrote:
> Hi,
> have a similar situation in the office. According to the Exim docs, Exim
> was
> not made to handle this problem. The work arounds are:
Things have changed, newer exim versions (at least newer then potato's),
allow to spe
Hi,
have a similar situation in the office. According to the Exim docs, Exim was
not made to handle this problem. The work arounds are:
1. to use two machines (the method I use) one as a smart host and the other for
local delivery of network mail
2. to use to installs of Exim on one machine, on
Hi!
Could anybody help me with configering exim correctly?
I have installed exim on a machine with a dialup connection to my isp.
This machine, named meister.kosmos, should relay emails from other
machines on my local network (*.komsos) and should send them per smtp
when connecting to my isp. I ha
>What version of exim are you using? I'm going to have to upgrade to
>this, because this behavior is what I want. Currently, I use a
>patched exim to get exactly this behavior. If exim now does this by
>default (that is, local mail _doesn't_ get rewritten) I can stop using
>my hacked together v
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 02:59:42AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> Of cause it is up to them. The script runs as a gid who can change the
> file. They may only change their own entry (realuid), so there is no
> problem with this.
Erm, no.
> SL> If it cannot put in the proper address, that
>> "SL" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SL> Says who? We have two shell machines. web1.calweb.com and
SL> web2.calweb.com. But we'd prefer mail go to mx.calweb.com or
SL> mail.calweb.com. We could put in a rewrite rule but that would,
SL> as you say above, screw up any user level mo
On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 01:50:37AM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> SL> And say I am on your machine and want to make a report and have it
> SL> comes back to my machine (rpglink.com). Are you going to insert
> SL> another rewrite rule?
> Yes. If I don't, the default rewrite would apply.
W
>> "DE" == Daniel Elenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DE> So, I use exim to do a rewrite on the 'from' and 'reply-to' fields
DE> of outgoing mail sent by me. The problem is, like I've pointed out
DE> before, that local mail isn't affected by this. I don't understand
DE> why not!?
I don't know ex
>> "SL" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SL> And say I am on your machine and want to make a report and have it
SL> comes back to my machine (rpglink.com). Are you going to insert
SL> another rewrite rule?
Yes. If I don't, the default rewrite would apply.
SL> Now apply that to, say, a
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 11:42:50PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> This is no bug in the software. It sends the mail as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a valid address in my own
> net. Clearly, this is not a valid address, when the mails leaves my
> net through my dialup link.
> There is no reason
Steve Lamb writes:
>On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
>> >SL> Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
>
>> >Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
>> >package for example, which will help in sending a bug report. Without
>> >such a rewrite, it wi
>> "SL" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SL> Then that is a bug with the software that is submitting the
SL> incorrect header to the MTA and should be fixed.
This is no bug in the software. It sends the mail as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a valid address in my own
net. Clearly, this is no
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
> >SL> Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
> >Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
> >package for example, which will help in sending a bug report. Without
> >such a rewrite, it will send the bug, using a
>SL> Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
>
>Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
>package for example, which will help in sending a bug report. Without
>such a rewrite, it will send the bug, using a bogus from-address, and
>the maintainer can't contact the submitter for
>> "SL" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SL> [1 ]
SL> On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fr
SL> Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
Because you don't always use a MUA when you send mails. Take the bug
package for example
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Daniel Elenius wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fr
Uhm, who not do that in the MUA?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus| employer's. They hired me for my
I have a line in my exim.conf that rewrites my from and reply-to
addresses,
like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] fr
danel698... is my 'real' mail address, on my POP3 mail-server. I don't
want people to get my [EMAIL PROTECTED], since I don't have my computer turned
on all the time.
Th
17 matches
Mail list logo
