Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 472340 +etch
Bug#472340: xserver-xorg-video-i810: A problem with hotkey-switching to clone
mode on a Dell Inspiron 1300
Tags were: patch
Tags added: etch
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
sequencing enabled, and discovered a problem with the
> init.d scripts provided in the x11-common package. The script depend
> on $remote_fs, while there is nothing as far as I can see that need
> more than a mounted /tmp/, which is available with $local_fs. Also,
> it depend on $named
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 470940 +pending
Bug#470940: x11-common: Problem with LSB header in init.d script
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.19
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
I just checked the boot order in unstable on a machine with dependency
based boot sequencing enabled, and discovered a problem with the
init.d scripts provided in the x11-common
Your message dated Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469995: fixed in xdm 1:1.1.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #469995,
regarding xdm: Problem with LSB header in init.d script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:02:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470113: fixed in xfs 1:1.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #470113,
regarding xfs: Problem with LSB header in init.d script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Package: xfs
Version: 1:1.0.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
I just checked the shutdown order in unstable on a machine with
dependency based boot sequencing enabled, and discovered a problem
with the init.d scripts provided in
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.1.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
I just checked the shutdown order in unstable on a machine with
dependency based boot sequencing enabled, and discovered that the xdm
got a stop symlink in rcS.d/. This
Your message dated Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404079: fixed in xterm 232-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #404079,
regarding display problem with xterm + screen and bold characters
to be marked as done.
This means that you
In fact problem appeared as a result of restoring /etc/group from
backup. Script was unable to find group 'Debian-exim' and raising
error.
Btw, such group cannot be created with groupadd.
On Jan 7, 2008 11:31 PM, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:48:09AM +0100, B
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:49:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451335: xserver-xorg problem with pre/post-removal scripts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: compizconfig-settings-manager
Version: 0.6.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #455750
The problem remains with the new debian release 0.6.0-2
The problem was solved if you remove the python2.3 package:
sudo apt-get --purge remove python2.3
Reading pack
Is it better with latest xserver-xorg? (1:7.3+6, soon to be replaced by
1:7.3+7)
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 451570 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13376
Bug#451570: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Lockup on start with acceleration on
915GM chip
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
forwarded 451570 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13376
thank you
Dylan Thurston wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:46:14PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> gree:.. wrote:
>>
>>> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
>>> Version: 2:2.2.0-1
>>> Severity: important
>>>
>>> I have th
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:46:14PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> gree:.. wrote:
>> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
>> Version: 2:2.2.0-1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> I have the same problem on 945GM (FUJITSU-SIEMENS AMILO PRO V3505). I find
>> out, that problem occures only if parameter Virtual 2
gree:.. wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.2.0-1
Severity: important
I have the same problem on 945GM (FUJITSU-SIEMENS AMILO PRO V3505). I find
out, that problem occures only if parameter Virtual 2560x1024 is set in
Xorg.conf.
Without Virtual parameter Xorg works fine for
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.2.0-1
Severity: important
I have the same problem on 945GM (FUJITSU-SIEMENS AMILO PRO V3505). I find
out, that problem occures only if parameter Virtual 2560x1024 is set in
Xorg.conf.
Without Virtual parameter Xorg works fine for me.
With Virtual p
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+3
dpkg -P xserver-xorg
Removing xserver-xorg ...
dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg (--purge):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 10
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Error
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 00:44 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 00:20:34 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
> > Bin Zhang wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> > > Version: 1:6.7.194-1
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Upgrading from version 1:6.6.193-3, I se
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 00:20:34 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Bin Zhang wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> > Version: 1:6.7.194-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Upgrading from version 1:6.6.193-3, I see a weird cursor.
> > If "ab" is the correct cursor's picture, I have now "ba
quot;ab" is the correct cursor's picture, I have now "ba".
> >
>
> Random idea: it could be a big-endian related problem.
>
> Same problem with 6.7.195-1 or 6.7.195-2 (when they will be built on
> powerpc)?
Yes. Same problem with 6.7.195-2 (built from your
Bin Zhang wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.7.194-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> Upgrading from version 1:6.6.193-3, I see a weird cursor.
> If "ab" is the correct cursor's picture, I have now "ba".
>
Random idea: it
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.194-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Upgrading from version 1:6.6.193-3, I see a weird cursor.
If "ab" is the correct cursor's picture, I have now "ba".
Option "SWcursor" "on"
is a workaround.
Best regards,
Bin
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/l
s avoid them. The panels do
> have GDK_WINDOW_TYPE_HINT_DOCK set which is sufficient to avoid this
> problem with metacity.
>
Could you report this upstream at bugzilla.freedesktop.org? You might
want to provide a screenshot explaining the problem, since the problem
isn't obvious
other windows avoid them. The panels do
have GDK_WINDOW_TYPE_HINT_DOCK set which is sufficient to avoid this
problem with metacity.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x8
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4-2
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I'm having the same issue with "greedy" vs the ATI driver. There is a patch in
bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12520 that fixes it for me. Actually, I
had corruption in several places and this fixe
Package: xlibs-data
Version: 1:7.2-5
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
This problem is recent, but I do not know when it started. The Compose file
(/usr/share/X11/locale/en_US.UTF-8/Compose) now has wrong definitions for
the Greek DASIA and PSILI symbols. So for instance when the keyboard is
switched t
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:39:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package gv
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gv
> reassign 302383 xprint 1:1.1.99.3+git20060910-9
Bug#302383: gv: problem with Unicode chars when jumping to page
Bug reassigned from package `gv' to `xprint'.
> thanks
Stopping proce
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:09:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324777: ctrl, atl, shift, and alt-gr don't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
t; Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will
> close this bug in the next weeks.
I don't seem to be able to reproduce the problem with video-intel
2:2.0.0-5. Looks like it's been fixed.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
regarding the i810 Xorg driver having problems when drawing on a rotated
screen. Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With
Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will
close this bug
> Hi,
>
> About a year ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding Xorg 6.9 not working with the ATI driver. Did any of you guys
> reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
> xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
> week
t; xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
> weeks.
No problem with this driver since about X.Org 7.0.
For me, this bug can be closed.
Greetings,
Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 15:31:46 pm Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About a year ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding Xorg 6.9 not working with the ATI driver. Did any of you guys
> reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
> xserver-xorg-core and d
Brice Goglin a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> About a year ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding Xorg 6.9 not working with the ATI driver. Did any of you guys
> reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
> xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will close this
drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
> weeks.
Oh, I had completely forgotten this bug. It has been, for my case, fixed
by reverting to the previous xorg package for about a month or two, and
then one day it was fixed. No problem with my ATI since then.
lspci output, for the record :
0
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
regarding Xorg 6.9 not working with the ATI driver. Did any of you guys
reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
weeks.
Thanks,
B
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.0.0-4
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
My laptop with a i915GM was suspending to ram and to disk fine with the
non-modesetting driver (i810), even if i had to use 915resolution to set
the modes, vbetool to POST the video, and press
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2007 20:20:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326635: a problem with the
xserver-xorg/config/monitor/screen-size template Choices-pt_BR
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:44:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420757: After upgrading xserver does not start any longer
- apparently problem with libdri
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 16:21 +0200, Matthias Breier wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-2
> Severity: critical
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> Hello,
>
> after upgrading to the new version the X server does not start anymore. In the
> KDM logfile
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-2
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hello,
after upgrading to the new version the X server does not start anymore. In the
KDM logfile it says:
"/usr/bin/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/
Hermann Kraus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've done further testing and the same problem occurs with supsend to
> disk (software suspend2). Sometimes during suspend sometimes during
> resume a kernel oops is printed.
A oops is definitely a kernel problem first. If it still happens with
2.6.21-rc5, you sho
Hello,
I've done further testing and the same problem occurs with supsend to disk
(software suspend2). Sometimes during suspend sometimes during resume a
kernel oops is printed. Also the backlight is turned off and on twice when
starting the server. So this xserver is not suitable for every
Hello my friend,
I own a Thinkpad T23 containing a Savage videocard. For a while, there is a
problem with dri and / or glx support. I already found the matching
bug-report on the net. It concerns Bug#393266 maybe also #390626.
Please, could you be so kind, and check this out for me (and all of
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 19:37, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> - implementing a solution in dexconf could be as easy as grepping
> /proc/bus/input/devices or /sys/class/input/input$i/name
IMO that would be an acceptable solution until upstream sets better
defaults.
> Cons: it's a 2.6 kernel onl
severity 406499 important
merge 406499 351621
thanks
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:21:25PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 12 January 2007 18:05, Niels Möller wrote:
> > It turns out it's an alps (I don't really know much about PC hardware).
>
> OK. That explains it. Thanks for confirming.
>
>
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:25:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
problems with the X server on a Sony PictureBook.
Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug
in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 13:53 +0100, Erik Tews wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 21.01.2007, 12:55 +0100 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> >
> > In addition to the information requested by Sune, it would be useful to
> > get a backtrace from gdb attached to the X server (only possible from a
> > remote login), ideall
Am Sonntag, den 21.01.2007, 12:55 +0100 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 19:41 +0100, Erik Tews wrote:
> >
> > I am using gdm and a gnome-desktop afterwards. Sometimes my x-server
> > crashes (about 2 times a day or so). I get the same backtrace:
> >
> > Backtrace:
> > 0: /usr/bin/X
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 19:41 +0100, Erik Tews wrote:
>
> I am using gdm and a gnome-desktop afterwards. Sometimes my x-server
> crashes (about 2 times a day or so). I get the same backtrace:
>
> Backtrace:
> 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354]
> 1: [0xb7f31420]
> 2: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+
Hi
I am using gdm and a gnome-desktop afterwards. Sometimes my x-server
crashes (about 2 times a day or so). I get the same backtrace:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354]
1: [0xb7f31420]
2: /usr/bin/X(Dispatch+0x81) [0x8086b91]
3: /usr/bin/X(main+0x489) [0x806e699]
4: /lib/t
found 384410 1.7.2-3
retitle 384410 Problem with drawing on rotated screen
thanks
Henryk wrote:
> When I rotate the screen using xrandr, and draw a line with
> a mouse in a graphical application (e.g. gimp), the line
> does not appear immediately. When I click the mouse and start
>
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:02:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306404: Problem with VIA X driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Dnia środa, 17 stycznia 2007 10:07, Brice Goglin napisał:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the X
> server apparently not supporting a VIA/S3 Unichrome Pro board.
> Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug
> in the next w
Hi Jakub,
About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the X
server apparently not supporting a VIA/S3 Unichrome Pro board.
Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug
in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 03:56:27PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > agree - I was not thinking of the search list (though I'm aware of it).
> >
> > The description I read did not mention it, either...
>
> Mac OS's approach to dynamic libraries is ... s
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> agree - I was not thinking of the search list (though I'm aware of it).
>
> The description I read did not mention it, either...
Mac OS's approach to dynamic libraries is ... somewhat unusual.
AFAICT, the way things work there is that each library hard-
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 07:00:25PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2006-12-24 08:48:36 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 02:39:07PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Mac OS X *seems* to always use rpath: unlike Linux, I've never had
> >
> > I was reading something like t
On 2006-12-24 08:48:36 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 02:39:07PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Mac OS X *seems* to always use rpath: unlike Linux, I've never had
>
> I was reading something like that yesterday (considering what new
> development I could do for shared lib
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 02:39:07PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2006-12-22 17:04:14 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:17:06PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > I prefer to have them (libraries compiled by the user) in a separate
> > > directory. Applications that us
On 2006-12-22 17:04:14 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:17:06PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I prefer to have them (libraries compiled by the user) in a separate
> > directory. Applications that use ncurses should also be recompiled.
>
> I suppose so. In 5.6 I've revi
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:17:06PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2006-12-22 15:42:45 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > Or the more straightforward solution - I'm running ncurses 5.6 on all
> > platforms. Aside from being a nuisance, there's no problem updating
> > just the libraries.
>
> I pre
On 2006-12-22 15:42:45 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Or the more straightforward solution - I'm running ncurses 5.6 on all
> platforms. Aside from being a nuisance, there's no problem updating
> just the libraries.
I prefer to have them (libraries compiled by the user) in a separate
directory. Ap
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:56:55PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2006-12-22 10:07:25 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > I've seen some confusing comments about Mac OS X "curses" versus "ncurses",
> > but am left with the impression that it's still ncurses (in a different
> > directory, etc, but s
On 2006-12-22 10:07:25 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> I've seen some confusing comments about Mac OS X "curses" versus "ncurses",
> but am left with the impression that it's still ncurses (in a different
> directory, etc, but still the same code).
Mac OS X 10.4.x uses ncurses, even with the curses
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2006-12-22 06:27:26 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > If there's no new information here, there's nothing to fix (the
> > fixes are in ncurses 5.5, and there's no way other than by breaking
> > the related fixes for luit to make nc
On 2006-12-22 06:27:26 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> If there's no new information here, there's nothing to fix (the
> fixes are in ncurses 5.5, and there's no way other than by breaking
> the related fixes for luit to make ncurses 5.4 work as you want).
The problem is that Debian/stable still pro
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 07:20:40PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 07:00:15PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Package: xterm
> > Version: 223-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Not sure this is a bug in xterm, but the following problems don't occur
> > with rxvt.
>
> This s
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 07:00:15PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 223-1
> Severity: important
>
> Not sure this is a bug in xterm, but the following problems don't occur
> with rxvt.
This sounds like (see http://invisible-island.net/ncurses/NEWS.gz)
20040710
+
Package: xterm
Version: 223-1
Severity: important
Not sure this is a bug in xterm, but the following problems don't occur
with rxvt.
Xterm doesn't behave correctly when there are bold characters in screen,
when using TERM=xterm-debian or TERM=xterm-xfree86, but no problem when
using TERM=xterm. I
phillip gerry,
After a thorough examination of your account, we have found
14 companies willing to help you. You've been O.K.ayed
from 235K at 6.46% to 530K at 5.99%
www.batticu.com/16r
I can help all people, no matter what their ratings are.
Best Respects,
Ty Edwardsd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xtrans package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:15:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360852: Unpurgeable: problem with postrm script
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 2:1.6.5-1
Severity: normal
When I rotate the screen using xrandr, and draw a line with
a mouse in a graphical application (e.g. gimp), the line
does not appear immediately. When I click the mouse and start
dragging, it draws a sequence of dots instead of
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ### Since I am not more on this List, please honor my Mail-Follow-Up ###
if it were a bug report, I'd insist on newsgroup followups.
> How can I set it to my choice, e.g. "Help: Fvwm2" or "Help: FvwmButtons"?
mcview is using slang, which assumes that
### Since I am not more on this List, please honor my Mail-Follow-Up ###
Hello Developers and Maintainers,
since I have not gotten an answer on any $USER mailinglists, I must
ask the "real" X-Profis here on this list. ;-)
I like to use mcview to view manpages under X because the search
function
Unless I'm mistaken, noone from the X team has commented on
Christopher's patches. As someone who just lost a couple of minutes
figuring out that it was gdm and xserverrc forcing DPI's over my
carefully-crafted DisplaySize line (and much more reading through this
thread), I find this idea better t
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.8-6
Followup-For: Bug #366615
If you set the XkbModel to "macintosh_vndr", it doesn't actually set it
to that - it drops back to "pc105". You can see this behaviour with
setxkbmap:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ setxkbmap -rules xorg -model macintosh_vndr -layout gb
-print
xkb
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:31:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372839: More info
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Gentlemen,
I am very sorry to bug you with a question about a videogame, but I am obliged
to do so by my two-year old boy, who simply loves Tux in ppracer... So, in order
to avoid disappointing him, I'm fighting a desperate battle against video
drivers, kernel modules, GL libraries ad whatnot.
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Hi,
I just tried to do an apt-get dist-upgrade. When it came to upgrading
x11-common I got the message that /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty and that I
should empty it and run the installation again. So I did and got the
following error message:
Preparing
Hi All!
I have a big problem with the xserver-xorg package in etch.
(ii xserver-xorg 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6the
X.Org X server)
The problem is, that X get a signal when I use gnome. (But not with
icewm)
The backtrace what I can gain is the follow:
*** If
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.10
Followup-For: Bug #362112
I have the exact same problem with the Norwegian keyboard. Is there a
quick hack as I really need the Alt Gr to work...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'uns
Package: xterm
Version: 210-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I observed two strange effects with German Umlauts:
1. I can type in Umlauts and they are printed nicely, but
if I press backspace to remove the Umlaut I have to
press it twice to remove it completely. Imagine that
I tested
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was suprised that this package wasn't purging it's configuration and
was instead exiting prematurely with a -128 code. I took some time to
tinker around with a local copy of the postrm from /var/lib/dpkg/info,
and was able t
Hi, all
Im mantainer of Xbanner package and I have 2 bugs filled that maybe
you can help me.
---
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256519
the xconfigconfig script doesn't work and the xdm config files that it
should modify don't exist anymore.
--
I have an older IBM server with s3 trio 64 "onboard".
If I install Mandrake or Ubuntu, I get a usable X-server (so I know it's
possible).
I've installed several versions of Debian (most recently the latest "stable"
version), but installer sees the graphics hardware as VESA (VGA mode) and none
d the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PRO
David Nusinow a écrit :
> severity important
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Yannick Beynet wrote:
>
>>Package: xserver-xorg
>>Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
>>Severity: critical
>>Justification: breaks the whole system
>>
>>
>>
>>when I install xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.
Hi all,
After updating the packages and upgrading my system, xserver-xorg
upgraded to version 6.9. After that I couldn't start X anymore.
Downgrading to xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.deb solves the
problem, but since packages.debian is down for a while, I can't get the
xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg
David Nusinow a écrit :
> severity important
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Yannick Beynet wrote:
>
>>Package: xserver-xorg
>>Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
>>Severity: critical
>>Justification: breaks the whole system
>>
>>
>>
>>when I install xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.
severity important
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Yannick Beynet wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
>
> when I install xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.deb, X work.
So, X *does* work? If
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
when I install xserver-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-11_i386.deb, X work.
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xorg
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /va
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 07:59:34PM -0500, Josh Babcock wrote:
> looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to
> libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib.
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> For you Debian guys:
> Package Installed PreviousNow
> State
> =
Josh Babcock writes:
> looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to
> libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib.
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> For you Debian guys:
> Package Installed PreviousNow
> State
> ===-===-===-==
Josh Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK,
> looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to
> libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib.
> Thanks for the tip.
This link is only needed for building software and as such is part of the
-dev package, not the library package. You want to in
101 - 200 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
