RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Quick Stats for Declude's kill list:

2002-08-02 Thread Tom
The following is a quick report from an application we are working on. Hopefully this will tell us how effective our kill list is and what addresses can be removed after X amount of time. It should be obvious as to what addresses are not being used. We will post an update once more time goes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Quick Stats for Declude's kill list:

2002-08-02 Thread Eddie Cornejo
This will be great! Thanks Tom, for your great work. Eddie Cornejo, Sys Admin Tom Rowe Associates 956-412-6600 Ext.10 Toll Free USA 888-866-7693 Toll Free Canada 877-866-7693 http://www.tomrowe.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD AND ALERT Not Working For Me

2002-08-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
WEIGHTA10 ALERT WEIGHT10HOLD I want to alert and hold the message, but it does not seem that this combination of actions works together. I know the alert portion is working, because I can trigger it with rsp set off WEIGHTA10 Any thoughts on how I can accomplish what I want?

[Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread Darrell L.
I am sure most people use the weighting system. For the most part you have certain weights were you know that 99% of the mail triggering that weight is spam. Do you BOUNCE, HOLD, Or DELETE? Right now I am using HOLD, but was considering switching that to BOUNCE. There are defiantly some

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD AND ALERT Not Working For Me

2002-08-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hopefully, in the future you might be able to build in something along the lines of that. My thought was to quarantine the suspected spam and send an alert back to the user. If by some chance it was legitimate mail then I would be able to add it back to the queue. We have had requests for a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread Sheldon Koehler
If you are 99% certain that an E-mail is spam, the BOUNCE action usually has a major con: 99% of spammers use a fake return address, so you will be doing a huge amount of work (re-trying tons of bounce messages, and sending lots of bounces to innocent people) for a small benefit (alerting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude's Kill list update 08/02/02

2002-08-02 Thread Tom
Here is an update for the kill list for 08/02/02 - Even though each address is checked, we strongly suggest you use it at your own risk. The entire list can be downloaded from the following URL: http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog/fromfile.txt Regards, Tom Image`fx

DORKZTL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread Jim Rooth
One of the neat things about Declude is it doesn't let the idiot on the other end know you deleted his spam. If he did, there are those who sit up until the wee hours trying to get around a program just cuz he can. I personally have a huge myfilter.txt file (over 1800 entries) and I have

[Declude.JunkMail] Newbie

2002-08-02 Thread ITG Lists
Hi All, New to this list, Imail and Declude. I purchased the Pro version, and aside from entering my code, I left config files as-is. What is the recommended strategy to start using the product effectively? Thanks, George --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie

2002-08-02 Thread Bill Landry
Welcome to the list, George! Wow, that really is an open-ended question. It really depends on how aggressive you want to be with your spam filtering. After reading over the manual that is maintained on the Declude download site, if you can give us an idea of what you would like to accomplish

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread Eje Gustafsson
I used bounce but got so many return bounces due to the poor bouncing option Imail offer Declude. We block a good 3-5k messages each day out of 8-10k total. So many spammers use fake addresses or get their service disconnected/discontinued or simply get their mailboxes full that there will be a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie

2002-08-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Well, first, I see that the log file is supposed to be in spool folder. I have been running since 9 AM this morning, and I don't see the log file. I did install properly. The first thing to check is that the LOGFILE line in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file wasn't changed to point to an

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie

2002-08-02 Thread ITG Lists
Thanks Scott, The -diag did the trick. I found my files had _ instead of . in the names. So back to my question - is the stock config too aggressive - should I turn off any tests to start? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Quick Stats for Declude's kill list:08/02/01

2002-08-02 Thread Tom
Here is the latest report as promised, take a look at the ID's that caught the most. Please don't rely on these ID's yet because we are still trying different variations to figure out what would be the best way to implement the usage of them without having to do any major coding. All ideas and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I used bounce but got so many return bounces due to the poor bouncing option Imail offer Declude. FWIW, the reason that the double bounces occur isn't because of a poor bouncing option -- it's because the bounce can't occur during the SMTP transaction (IMail doesn't allow programs to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Scott: FWIW, the reason that the double bounces occur isn't because of a poor bouncing option well - the ONE pending enhancement is that we can use a BETTER mailer than imail1.exe that would permit us to send from - as it should be. THEN we would not SEE any bounces. IMail doesn't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Quick Stats for Declude's kill list:08/02/01

2002-08-02 Thread ITG Lists
Hi Tom, Newbie question - this kill list is used in Imail program - not Declude? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie

2002-08-02 Thread John Tolmachoff
Welcome. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ITG Lists Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie Question about the Kill list posted here

2002-08-02 Thread Tom
Newbie question - this kill list is used in Imail program - not Declude? No this kill list is for Declude specifically, however, with proper manipulation it can be used with Imail's kill list. Regards, Tom Image`fx --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What Action Do you take?

2002-08-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
FWIW, the reason that the double bounces occur isn't because of a poor bouncing option well - the ONE pending enhancement is that we can use a BETTER mailer than imail1.exe that would permit us to send from - as it should be. THEN we would not SEE any bounces. Good point, I hadn't taken

[Declude.JunkMail] Stock Configuration

2002-08-02 Thread ITG Lists
Sorry for the newbie questions, I will read the manual again tonight ;-) Is the stock configuration too aggressive - should I turn off any tests to start? I am seeing a lot of REVERSE DNS errors and wonder how many legitimate messages would be blocked? Thanks! --- [This E-mail was scanned for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Stock Configuration

2002-08-02 Thread Bill Landry
It really depends on what action you are taking on flagged messages. I think the default is hold, if I remember correctly. With that, you can simply review the held messages to see if there are any legitimate messages, and if so, you can move them back into the IMail spool for delivery. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Stock Configuration

2002-08-02 Thread John Tolmachoff
Until I or others have time to give a detailed response, you should not b bounce or delete for now. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Stock Configuration

2002-08-02 Thread Bill Landry
Oh, and I forgot to mention another cool tool that another Tom has made available to the Declude JunkMail user community (those Tom's are great to have on distribution list, aren't they) called Delog, which will parse your JunkMail logs and generate a nicely formatted report of how each of your