Sorry if this is OT, but we are about to replace our NT4 mail server and
I am looking for a quick recommendation.
We have Imail V 8.0, but no current support agreement from Ipswitch.
Question: Is the upgrade to 8.2 worth the $695 for a support agreement?
Why?
Additional info:
~20 domains
~500
Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:35 PM
To: David Fletcher
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail recommendations (OT)
Not expecting a lot in the way of growth
That's really the key. You're sort of saying I'm perfectly satisfied.
Am I satisfied? This is why gathering (or even
head when I saw this one after hearing the question: Why is my
Outlook locking up?)
What limits do you all use?
Thanks for the input.
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338-9234
--
Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General
Protection Fault. [Paroty Error
Name: XXX
X-Note: Sender IP Address: X
X-Note: Sender Country ID:
X-Note:
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:17:12 -0400
X-RCPT-TO: XXX
Status: R
X-UIDL: 390996653
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338-9234
--
Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven
Thanks. I just wanted to be sure.
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bogus Date header
I am trying to help out the admin of another server by showing him
Has spamcop stopped working? I'm not seeing any reference to it in my
logs now (set to mid) or headers.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Good call, Scott. I don't think any of these tests are showing up right
now. I'm going to bump up the logging and take a better look.
OSSRC ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.4
16 0
SPAMCOP ip4rbl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2
16 0
JAPAN
More info:
Debug gives me these lines:
07/07/2003 13:10:54 Qa9930eca013e736e Test 1-SPAMCOP didn't get a
response.
07/07/2003 13:10:54 Qa9930eca013e736e Test 2-JAPAN didn't get a
response.
07/07/2003 13:10:54 Qa9930eca013e736e Test 3-MONKEYFORMMAIL didn't get a
response.
07/07/2003 13:10:54
We're using our internet provider's DNS server. It seems to work, but I don't know
how to test it for the types of queries declude uses.
nslookup works fine.
--
David FletcherInfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338-9234 (904)721-1253 fax
http://www.ITI-InfoTech.com
Any event, once
You could always reverse it and set the number of characters really low and add a
negative weight if it failed. ;)
Not that that would be any more useful, but it is nice to have a product that's so
flexible.
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC
Speaking of SPAMCOP, one option would be to increase the weight that that test
applies. Then you will block mail that fails that test and another, but pass mail
that fails only that test.
YMMV
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338
?
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338-9234
(904)721-1253 fax
http://www.ITI-InfoTech.com
__
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Monday
.
-Scott
Thanks,
David
__
David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)721-0867
(904)721-1253 fax
http://www.iti-infotech.com (business)
http://www.mahonri.org (personal
13 matches
Mail list logo