RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
te a while). Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Nelson Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:08 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times... Just in case this helps anyone else: I&#x

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-17 Thread Darin Cox
9 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times... I did the same. There is definitely an issue with 2.0.6.16. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:43 PM > T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread Evans Martin
m > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times... > > I dropped back to an older version and within an hour my queue&overflow > went from 42000+ to 25 (that's twenty-five) emails. Mail from gmail, > yahoo, > msn, and the rest of the world now gets processed in a matter of se

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread James Nelson
Just in case this helps anyone else: I've done some digging and noticed that the easynet.nl tests don't seem to resolve (blackholes.easynet.nl, dynablock.easynet.nl, proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl) and after removing those tests it seemed to work much better. Though I am taking the time to opt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread Michael Hardrick
one's help. --Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael L. Hardrick Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 16:58 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times... Is there any reason the Queue times would

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
2005 4:37 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times... > > Mike, > > I had the EXACT same problem today although I caught it very early to > QueueMon. I had to add the DNSOVERRIDE xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx where xxx... is in > the d

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
://www.invariantsystems.com - Original Message - From: "Michael L. Hardrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 5:57 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times... Is there any reason the Queue times would be over three hours? The Queue is backed up to ove

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread James Nelson
I've noticed the same problem (also starting last night some time), I'm still running Declude 2.0.5. I am still working on diagnosing it, but I have been noticing that the Declude instances seem to be running longer than normal. The dec.log doesn't seem to indicate anything unusual, but I

[Declude.JunkMail] Very slow Queue times...

2005-06-16 Thread Michael L. Hardrick
Is there any reason the Queue times would be over three hours? The Queue is backed up to over 2+ and the overflow directory has 19000+ as well. It's taking about four hours to deliver mail to and from our server even on local accounts. I've checked the CPU usage and rebooted the machine twice