> My question is, other than not installing the Real time portion of F-Prot,
> what else do I need to do with the f-prot settings? other than the
updating
> scheduler, obviously.
That is all we did.
> If there's nothing else to be done with F-prot, then this has to be the
> most painless installa
Ok, fresh user of Declude Virus here, so please excuse...
Got the declude running, it seems to be catching viruses and sending emails
to the correct recipients. I set everything up as per the manual. So far so
good.
My question is, other than not installing the Real time portion of F-Prot,
what e
> If this will be a future feature please also provide a posibility to add
> a custom message.
Instead of going the route of having that option, I would rather have a link
in the notification that they can click on that will provide more
information and an explanation of what to do.
Just my .02.
If this will be a future feature please also provide a posibility to add
a custom message.
Thanks
Markus
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Taugher
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 4:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declu
The point is, there are times as support for a national software program for
non-profit organizations, that we need to send just a DLL to a client who
has deleted it. They aren't smart enough to use WINZIP.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any way in which Declude Virus could have an option called
"STRIPATTACHMENT" which would provide cross functionality between an virus
infected email and a banned attachment?
That is that, while we BAN attachments of MP3, PIF, SCR, etc .. we would
like the message to be able to go thro
I am running Declude 1.65 with F-Prot 3.12b. All virus scanning works
fine, as I receive several notifications weekly regarding infected
emails. However, the BANEXT feature does not seem to be working.
Only Declude Virus Standard and Declude Virus Pro support the banning of
file extensions.
Hello,
I am running Declude 1.65 with F-Prot 3.12b. All virus scanning works
fine, as I receive several notifications weekly regarding infected
emails. However, the BANEXT feature does not seem to be working. I
sent test emails with VBS attachments and they got through. Here's the
BANEXT portio
It turned out they were quite right - Outlook happily placed an "End"
delimiter between the HTML text of the email and a word attachment. Is this
a known bug? I've done som testing, and this appears to happen whenever I
send a HTML email with an attachment. We are using Outlook 2000 (build
9.0.0.6
Hi all,
I just had one of our clients tell me that email from us was cached in their
mailscanner because the email isn't MIME compliant (RFC 1341).
The encapsulation boundary following the last body part is a distinguished
delimiter that indicates that no further body parts will follow. Such a
10 matches
Mail list logo
