me too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Siegfried Kirchmair
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 1999 1:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: CORBA (was Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.)
Hi,
Richard wrote:
> How m
Sent: Tuesday, 7 September 1999 12:20
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: RE: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
--- Max Renshaw-Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> Have a look at the MS URL that Kerry posted - it's a pretty good
> argument for the flying obje
--- Max Renshaw-Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> Have a look at the MS URL that Kerry posted - it's a pretty good
> argument for the flying objects scenario
Ummm, I didn't post such a URL, and didn't see who did. I wouldn't
mind taking a look though, if somebody doesn't mind posting it
Tony Blomfield
Sent: Monday, 6 September 1999 21:05
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
Thanks Max. I'm already into that, and more or less decided it is the most
efficient all round solution. Less work to implement as well.
I was really
PerfectData - Wellington is interested
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Tony Blomfield
> Sent: Monday, 6 September 1999 21:05
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
>
>
snip
> I can see that us
Count me in.
TonyB
Definitely... Cost will however be an issue to those with the
pursestrings... I'm very
keen... The centralised processing and interface independance have too many
customers interested to ignore this technology...
--
Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
Jump Productions
(07) 838-3371 Voice
I completely agree with this part.
>If you want to make stuff really thin, then you must at some stage cache
>data on the users (client) PC and only update it when there is a change in
>the same data on the server - this can be very effective for all those
>lookup tables that don't change very of
onday, 6 September 1999 07:15
Subject: RE: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
Tony,
What about the solution that Wade organised in Aus, where the major smarts
were just in caching the lookups with client datasets.
I've been doing some stuff recently, which is also essentially 2 tier but
all
I'm a starter for Wellington.
Laurence Bevan
Master Business Systems Ltd
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
Derricutt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 06, 1999 2:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: RE: CORBA (was Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.)
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Max Renshaw-Fox wrote:
> How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MI
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Max Renshaw-Fox wrote:
> How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
> (Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
> probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe
I'd be in, as long as
Yes please Richard
Max
[Richard Said]
How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
(Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe
in
a single day. Just interest a
> How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
> (Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
> probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe in
> a single day. Just interest at this stage - don't let cost be
Myles.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Blomfield [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 8:46 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> Subject: Re: CORBA (was Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.)
>
> There seemws to be very little mileage in
to see anyway.
Max
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Tony Blomfield
Sent: Thursday, 2 September 1999 20:16
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
Thanks for the replies.
Bypassing the BDE is not an
On 3/09/99 at 20:46 Tony Blomfield wrote:
>There seemws to be very little mileage in going this way.
>
>1. Is this really "Thin" technology is per my earlier goal statement.
Which was the reduction of network traffic, right? Then sure - it can be as thin (or
fat) as you want to make it.
>2. Fi
Hi,
Richard wrote:
> How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
> (Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
> probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe in
> a single day. Just interest at this stage
Hi Tony,
Tony Blomfield wrote:
> 1. Is this really "Thin" technology is per my earlier goal statement.
Not sure what your earlier goal statement was - see my comment about coming into
the thread 1/2 way.
> 2. Financially the only winners in this race are Borland. From what I read
> there is ab
The basics of using Delphi & CORBA is up on the Esperanto Group's site
(www.esperanto.org.nz). It also covers connecting to and from JBuilder's
implementation of CORBA.
Tony Blomfield wrote:
> OK.
>
> Well Thanks for all the points of view. As I am just starting a new project
> from the design u
D]>
Date: Friday, 3 September 1999 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
>That sounds pretty impressive. Are you using Corba or low level sockets?
>Corba of course has the disadvantage that it boosts some one else's bank
>account - probably to the detriment of m
--Original Message-
From: Richard Vowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, 3 September 1999 7:50 AM
Subject: CORBA (was Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.)
Nic Wise wrote:
> Remember, and Annie will hate me for saying
riginal Message-
> From: Nic Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, 2 September 1999 5:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
>
>
> > So if something is OLE DB capable then it is appa
ED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 8:05 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> Subject: CORBA (was Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.)
>
> Nic Wise wrote:
>
> > Remember, and Annie will hate me for saying this, but Delphi's CORBA
> > stuf
>That sounds pretty impressive. Are you using Corba or low level sockets?
>Corba of course has the disadvantage that it boosts some one else's bank
>account - probably to the detriment of mine. Is there a worthwhile margin in
>using Corba?
CORBA does have a cost, but it's a darn sight easier to w
Nic Wise wrote:
> Remember, and Annie will hate me for saying this, but Delphi's CORBA
> stuff is licenced by the SERVER, not by the CLIENT (MIDAS is different,
> I think?).
Stepping into this conversation without actually reading the thread (sorry), the
answer to that is no - MIDAS is normally
> From: Kerry Sainsbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, 2 September 1999 9:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
>
> On 2/09/99 at 20:16 Tony Blomfield wrote:
>
> > By &
Thanks. I'l check it out.
-Original Message-From:
Xander van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
Thursday, 2 September 1999 9:28 PMSubject: Re: [DUG]: Thin
Database Components.
Here are three URLs
sbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, 2 September 1999 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
On 2/09/99 at 20:16 Tony Blomfield wrote:
> By "Thin" I am referring
>to designing applications
On 2/09/99 at 20:16 Tony Blomfield wrote:
> By "Thin" I am referring
>to designing applications in such a way as to minimise the network traffic,
>Take a look at a telnet session into an AS400 as an example of
>"Thin" within this definition.
>I am not a three tier expert, but I find it
>hard to
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Xander van der
MerweSent: Thursday, 2 September 1999 21:29To: Multiple
recipients of list delphiSubject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database
Components.
Here are three URLs that I picked up of VCL
Components.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Tony BlomfieldSent: Wednesday, 1 September 1999
22:57To: Multiple recipients of list delphiSubject:
[DUG]: Thin Database Components.
1. For Interbase we have FIB and IBO
etwork also.
Thanks,
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: Nic Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, 2 September 1999 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.
> So if something is OLE DB capable then
> So if something is OLE DB capable then it is apparently a short step from there
> to ADO which of course means the BDE is bypassed.
>
OLE DB = driver for ADO.
ADO-MD = multi dimensional ADO, ie OLAP, which is rather cool...
N
--
Nic Wise - +64.21.676.418 - +64.9.277.5309 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Kerry Sainsbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 1/09/99 at 23:27 Nic Wise wrote:
>
> >> Tony Blomfield wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. For Interbase we have FIB and IBO
> >>
> >> 2. For Oracle we have ODA ?? Components.
> >
> >DOA, I beleive :) Direct Or
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 1/09/99 at 23:27 Nic Wise wrote:
>> Tony Blomfield wrote:
>>
>> 1. For Interbase we have FIB and IBO
>>
>> 2. For Oracle we have ODA ?? Components.
>
>DOA, I beleive :) Direct Oracle Access. Supposed to be quite good.
>
>> Does anybody know of si
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony
BlomfieldSent: Wednesday, 1 September 1999 22:57To:
Multiple recipients of list delphiSubject: [DUG]: Thin Database
Components.
1. For Interbase we have FIB and IBO
2. For Oracle
> Tony Blomfield wrote:
>
> 1. For Interbase we have FIB and IBO
>
> 2. For Oracle we have ODA ?? Components.
DOA, I beleive :) Direct Oracle Access. Supposed to be quite good.
> Does anybody know of similar components for working with the Database
> API for SQL Server 7, and Informix?
1. For Interbase we have FIB and IBO
2. For Oracle we have ODA ?? Components.
Does anybody know of similar components for working with the
Database API for SQL Server 7, and Informix?
TIA,
Tony.
39 matches
Mail list logo
