MySQL to Derby Migration Tool
-
Key: DERBY-1651
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1651
Project: Derby
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Tools
Reporter: Ramin Moazeni
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 428951/2006-08-05 05:42:48 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
23687664 2 143.56% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.mul
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425933 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Basically, during an object create time, Derby will first look for the required
privilege at the user level. If fo
David Van Couvering wrote:
BTW, a committer can always go back to the revision the patch was
made, apply it, and then go back to the tip of the trunk
The problem here (I think) is not that the patch was out of date, but
rather that the svn diff was not generated from the top of the code
tre
On 8/4/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The URLCheck code uses it through reflection, that's probably why you
missed it. I think the use of reflection (from what I remember) is over
the top, a simple list of the required attributes in URLCheck would be
good enough.
Yep, fro
derbytools.jar needs org.apache.derby.iapi.reference.Attribute even though that
class contains only interface Strings
-
Key: DERBY-1650
URL: http:/
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On 8/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [Auto-generated mail]
>>
>> *TinderBox_Derby* 428930/2006-08-05 02:32:58 CEST
>> *derbyall*
>>
>> Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
>> ---
>>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1544?page=comments#action_12425930 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1544:
--
one question before I commit the change, the initial comments indicates that
granting the execute perm
On 8/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 428930/2006-08-05 02:32:58 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
23687664 2 145.86%
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1544?page=comments#action_12425929 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1544:
--
I'll commit the patch but I think a better test of if the routines have been
granted permission by pub
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 428930/2006-08-05 02:32:58 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
23687664 2 145.86% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.mul
David Van Couvering wrote:
I changed the subject to see if this might get the attention of those
otherwise deleting the thread.
Thanks David! Looks like it worked :)
And thanks to Yip and Bryan for offering to start the review process. I do
appreciate your time and any feedback you might ha
On 8/4/06, David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, a committer can always go back to the revision the patch was made,
apply it, and then go back to the tip of the trunk
Actually, in this case, I think the patch just needs to be applied at
the leaf level, e.g.:
cd java/testing/org/a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1032:
---
Attachment: derby-1032-v2.diff
Attaching updated patch, which includes the new license headers.
> Create new scripts which follow common practice at Apac
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1156?page=all ]
Suresh Thalamati updated DERBY-1156:
Attachment: reencrypt_6.diff
DERBY -1156 (partial) (re) encryption of an existing database.
This patch adds code required to correctly handle crash/rec
BTW, a committer can always go back to the revision the patch was made,
apply it, and then go back to the tip of the trunk
David
Kathey Marsden (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1320?page=comments#action_12425924 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-132
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1320?page=comments#action_12425924 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1320:
---
Hi Manjula,
The change looks good but I could not apply the patch. I think that the issue
is that the patch was n
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-1108.
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Tried test on IBM 1.5 SR2 and Sun JDK 1.4.2 Committed svn_diff.txt.
Date: Fri Aug 4 18:50:47 2006
New Re
On 8/4/06, David Van Couvering (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12425906 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1032:
In bin/derby_common.sh:
+# distributed under the License is distribut
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425921 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1330:
--
Another question. This is what I have to document the behavior
for views, triggers, and constraints when only the PUB
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425919 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1330:
Laura, your understanding of the current behavior for revoke statement and
views is correct.
This behavior applie
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=all ]
Bryan Pendleton reassigned DERBY-1431:
--
Assignee: Andrew McIntyre (was: Bryan Pendleton)
I think derby-1431-alt2.diff is fine, and it addresses my problem completely,
as well as also sim
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1637?page=comments#action_12425917 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1637:
--
Uh-oh.
Sorry for very long line comment
Web-based application is very difficult ...
> OutBufferedStream.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1637?page=comments#action_12425916 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1637:
--
I tried ibm131 on my development environment and could executed it.
//Firstly, I thought ibm131 of 32-bit xSeri
Yip Ng wrote:
Got my attention. I am almost done with my other jira issues so I can
help review Army's XML patches. =)
Thanks, Yip!
I, too, am hoping to spend some time over the next few days reviewing
Army's patches. Learning about this work has been on my list for a while,
so I'm glad to g
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1330?page=comments#action_12425914 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1330:
--
I want to be certain that I understand cascading object dependencies. Please
correct any errors that I have in the sc
Got my attention. I am almost done with my other jira issues so I can help review Army's XML patches. =)YipOn 8/4/06, David Van Couvering
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I changed the subject to see if this might get the attention of thoseotherwise deleting the thread. I am heads down on the copyrig
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=comments#action_12425913 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1643:
--
I committed the patch but believe there should be a follow up. The new constant
defined for the revoke
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1643:
-
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Patch committed revision 428930. Thanks Mamta
> As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a
lang/wisconsin.java fails with different cursor names
---
Key: DERBY-1649
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1649
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Regress
I changed the subject to see if this might get the attention of those
otherwise deleting the thread. I am heads down on the copyright stuff
and don't know either SQL/XML or the compiler that well, so I'm not sure
I'm the right person to do the reviewing.
However, if someone else wants to do t
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 42/2006-08-04 23:22:57 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
2687685 2 147.96% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.mult
I vote for "other creative options" although I couldn't say what they
are right now...
David
Rick Hillegas wrote:
I have posed Dan's question to legal-dicuss: Does the AS IS clause of
the Apache 2.0 license conflict with the "testing and evaluation
purposes only" clause of JDBC4's early-draft
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425909 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
I was very unhappy with the content of the file that describes setting the
default access mode.
So based on your comme
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1521?page=comments#action_12425908 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1521:
-
lang/grantRevokeDDL.sql test gets different connections as different users
within the test . So I do not see a way where
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12425907 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1032:
At first glance these look good. I don't have the time to actually test
them... Thanks for your work on
David Van Couvering (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12425906
> ]
>
> David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1032:
>
>
> In bin/derby_common.sh:
>
> +# distributed under the
David Van Couvering wrote:
> +1, I think what Craig says here makes sense.
not sure
This sentence seems unrelated to what Craig said.
> There is no way anybody
> can legally run in production with JDBC4 until Java SE 6 is declared GA.
I think this fact is irrelvant, once Java SE 6 goes GA, th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12425906 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1032:
In bin/derby_common.sh:
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHO
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12425905 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1032:
I am sensitive to this right now for some odd reason :). Shouldn't script
files have the Apache license h
+1, I think what Craig says here makes sense. There is no way anybody
can legally run in production with JDBC4 until Java SE 6 is declared GA.
David
Craig Russell (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425901 ]
Craig Russell com
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1521?page=comments#action_12425904 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1521:
--
Other options:
1 - Use the new ij.runScript method to run the script, using a connection
obtained i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1032:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
> Create new scripts which follow common practice at Apache
> -
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1032:
---
Attachment: derby-1032-v1.diff
Attached is a patch with new scripts as described in the previous large comment
for this patch, to go into the bin directo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425901 ]
Craig Russell commented on DERBY-1639:
--
IANAL, but I don't think there is a problem. Derby is not an application. The
only way you can run Derby that exposes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-1377:
-
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Patch for moving notices from COPYRIGHT to NOTICE file committed revision 428924
> Update copyright he
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425896 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Progress being tracked (and hopefully coordination being managed) through this
Wiki page:
http://wiki.apa
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425895 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
I would say no to the generated javadoc, they are not source files.
Though maybe the copyright statemen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1603?page=all ]
Rajesh Kartha updated DERBY-1603:
-
Urgency: Urgent (was: Normal)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Bumping the Priority and Urgency. This issue occurs between versions, hence
can be exp
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425893 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Does our generated javadoc need to have license headers? My intuition is yes,
but looking for others opin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1642?page=all ]
Mamta A. Satoor closed DERBY-1642.
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Duplicate
This is duplicate of DERBY-1643
> As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a "revoke execute
I have posed Dan's question to legal-dicuss: Does the AS IS clause of
the Apache 2.0 license conflict with the "testing and evaluation
purposes only" clause of JDBC4's early-draft disclaimer. For more
context, see the discussion in the comments of DERBY-1639.
Geir Magnusson answered "yes", thi
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. A number of
Blocker and Urgent issues are still in motion. Now would be a good time
to alert the community if you are working on one of these issues and
think that you might need some help to fini
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1431:
---
Attachment: derby-1431-alt2.diff
Attaching updated patch which removes the link from frameworks/readme.html
which would be broken in the snapshot but cor
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1614?page=comments#action_12425889 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1614:
I agree, I think this approach is better than setting a default, especially one
which cannot be overridden. If the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=comments#action_12425888 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-1431:
Hi Andrew, thanks for looking at this.
Your suggestion is fine with me, but I think we also have to take the link
Yes, please!
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/4/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
This sounds good to me. Can this be done from the Administrator tab?
No, it has to be done while logged in as user derby-dev, who owns the
subscription. I can send you the password if
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
* if you know it's not going to pass a vote, call it what it is. :-)
And the best way to communicate this I think is to use our new
mechanism to escalate issues to Urgency Urgent or Critical.
That said, I would like to share that because of oth
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425887 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Okay, I see what you mean.
I am not sure that we want to use "coarse grained" and "fine grained" as
descriptions for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425886 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1057:
-
For information on derby.database.sqlAuthorization property, this mail from
Satheesh has some more information:
http://
On 8/4/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
This sounds good to me. Can this be done from the Administrator tab?
No, it has to be done while logged in as user derby-dev, who owns the
subscription. I can send you the password if you'd like to do it
yourself.
andrew
Hi Andrew,
This sounds good to me. Can this be done from the Administrator tab?
Thanks,
-Rick
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/4/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development.
I do not know if our patch mail is workin
+1 to daily mail for now.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/4/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development.
I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check
on it on Monday. Right now there are 28
OK. From my perspective it looks good, pretty basic switch.
David
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425877 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1431?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1431:
---
Attachment: derby-1431-alt.diff
Noticed this was still in the patch queue. I'm attaching an alternate patch for
this issue in order to revive this discus
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425882 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1646:
--
3) In one way there are not really two models, Laura you put it well in some
other comment that said s
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
* if you know it's not going to pass a vote, call it what it is. :-)
And the best way to communicate this I think is to use our new
mechanism to escalate issues to Urgency Urgent or Critical.
That said, I would like to share that because of other commitments and
upc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1521?page=comments#action_12425881 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1521:
-
Currently, only basic grant/revoke support is tested after upgrade. To run more
grant/revoke tests after upgrade, I was
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1596?page=comments#action_12425880 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1596:
Hi Stan,
A few small issues with the current patch:
- demo.html and navbar.html conflict with the recent change
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425878 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, answers to your questions
1)Yes
2)false
3)I think we should distinguish between the 2 models so we can de
On 8/4/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development.
I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check
on it on Monday. Right now there are 28 patches outstanding.
Of these 16 are marked fix ver
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425877 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1377:
--
review - I'll commit it once it's reviewed.
> Update copyright headers to comply with new ASF policy
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1544?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1544:
Attachment: d1544-patch2-v2.diff
Thanks Dan for committing patch 1.
I am attaching 'd1544-patch2-v2.diff' after synchronizing to latest svn
revision. No chan
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1319?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1319.
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed DERBY-1319_20060725_2.diff with revision 42889
Create a tool for database recovery
---
Key: DERBY-1648
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1648
Project: Derby
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Tools
Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425874 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1057:
Laura, here is some info based on what I know. May be someone else can verify
it. Also, please feel to reword/reph
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1614?page=all ]
John H. Embretsen updated DERBY-1614:
-
Attachment: DERBY-1614_v3.diff
Attatching 'DERBY-1614_v3.diff', which is a replacement for all previous
patches, provided that the changes are accept
Gads. Makes one's head spin.
David
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development.
I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check
on it on Monday. Right now there are 28 patches outstanding.
Of these 16 are marke
Great, thanks!
Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1424?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1424.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk with revision 428891.
Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency lis
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1377?page=comments#action_12425870 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1377:
Dan, I just noticed this patch you added. Is this something for review only,
or do you want me to commit
Dan had mentioned that .sql files could safely exist without license
headers. But a lot of our .sql files are tests, which I would argue are
creative works.
Any comments?
Thanks,
David
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1424?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1424.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk with revision 428891.
> Build derbyclient.jar from a dependency list generated by classlister
> --
On 8/3/06, Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
SUMMARY: UNABLE TO REPRODUCE PROBLEM :-(
That's a good thing. :-)
I applied patch for DERBY-1424 (i.e.) derby-1424-v1.diff.
I also ran jdbc40 TestSuite in both the Embedded and the client
frameworks. The test always seemed to pass. Seems l
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1629?page=all ]
David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1629:
---
Summary: Exceptions thrown by code in procedures or triggers are not
handled/thrown correctly by Derby (was:
StandardException.unexpectedUserExc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1315?page=all ]
Rajesh Kartha updated DERBY-1315:
-
Attachment: largeCodeGen.sql
Here is 4 line sql script to recreate the issue, hope this will help in
debugging and fixing the OOM error. I also plan
to bump
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1629?page=all ]
David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1629:
---
Derby Info: [Existing Application Impact, Regression] (was: [Regression,
Existing Application Impact, Patch Available])
> StandardException.unex
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1629?page=comments#action_12425860 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1629:
Committed Myrna's patch, revision 428887
> StandardException.unexpectedUserException() does not correctly
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 428803/2006-08-04 20:02:37 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
1687686 2 153.86% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.mult
Rick Hillegas wrote:
We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development.
I do not know if our patch mail is working. Andrew said he would check
on it on Monday. Right now there are 28 patches outstanding.
Of these 16 are marked fix version 10.2
Key Summary
DERBY-1643 As per t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12425856 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1057:
--
I think that we need to add the new derby.database.sqlAuthorization property to
the list of properties that are docume
We are headed into the last week of 10.2 development. A number of
Blocker and Urgent issues are still in motion. Now would be a good time
to alert the community if you are working on one of these issues and
think that you might need some help to finish by August 10. Thanks to
David for blazing
OK, thanks, the Big Slug should be avoided if possible. I've created a
Wiki page. I will work on the finishing touches on the scripts and then
publish them.
Thanks,
David
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks, David.
David Van Couvering wrote:
I am looking at the scope of this work, and I do not b
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=all ]
Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-1643:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
> As per the functional spec attached to DERBY-1330, a "revoke execute ...
> restrict" should fail if there are dependent o
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1643?page=all ]
Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-1643:
---
Attachment: DERBY1643_diff_V1_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt
DERBY1643_stat_V1_RevokeExecutePrivilege.txt
Here is the next incremental
patch(
Thanks, David.
David Van Couvering wrote:
I am looking at the scope of this work, and I do not believe I can
accomplish this by the end of next week if it is just me working on it.
Luckily, this task is easily chunked up. I have some scripts that I
got from the Apache site, and I am fine-tu
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1544?page=comments#action_12425848 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1544:
--
Patch d1544-patch1-v1.diff committed revision 428872 - Thanks Deepa
> Address remaining upgrade task(s
I am looking at the scope of this work, and I do not believe I can
accomplish this by the end of next week if it is just me working on it.
Luckily, this task is easily chunked up. I have some scripts that I got
from the Apache site, and I am fine-tuning these. Once I have them
working, I can
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425841 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
In Derby-1330 I asked some questions about the properties in the spec
AuthorizationMOdelFroDerbySQLStandardAuthorizati
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1647?page=all ]
David Van Couvering resolved DERBY-1647.
Resolution: Fixed
Sending
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/master/DerbyNet/jdk16/ieptests.out
Sending
java/tes
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425835 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639:
--
-1 on this change until it has been cleared through the legal-discuss and the
DB-PMC.
Rick, I believe
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
