В Сбт, 09/09/2006 в 04:55 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist пишет:
> On 9/8/06, Don Scorgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doc people do not have enough time. Its as simple as that. As shaunm
> > pointed out, this release we got 4 weeks to update the documentation.
> > This included 3 new modules needing do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> To me, that makes sense. An untranslated string is just as annoying as
> a frequently segfaulting program. So lets treat the problems the same.
> Code that changes behaviour shouldn't be committed unless the
> documentation is
On 9/8/06, Don Scorgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doc people do not have enough time. Its as simple as that. As shaunm
> pointed out, this release we got 4 weeks to update the documentation.
> This included 3 new modules needing docs, as well as lots of updates to
> lots of other docs. The doc
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> Here is my much-anticipated MASTER PLAN:
>
> Using my incredible mathematical genius, I have figured
> out how to fit an entire nine months of work into only
> six months. I knew there was a reason I got a degree
> in mathematics. (Or
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 10:17 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:56 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > > I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
> > > release
> > > schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certain numbe
James Henstridge wrote:
> On 08/09/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Your master plan implies branching early and heavily committing to
>> both branches for a long time. Reality check: we are still using this
>> archaic software called C.V.S.! Branching with that softwa
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:18 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Sex, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:32 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
> > > > What in particular isn't
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 12:59 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month release
> schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certain number of feature
> that would involve possible infrastructure changes in the platform.
>
Not sur
*The Lower Desktop, Upper Desktops*
(a letter to the Gnome community, in a poor English)
It was about two years while I was more or less in touch with Gnome,
and I must say that no other large free software project delivers so
much confusion to an outsider. And since Gnome has alway
Hi,
> * XSMP does a number of useful session-managey things (logout
> notification, logout cancellation, specifying apps that
> should be restarted right away if they crash, specifying
> commands to run at logout, etc) which we currently have no
> ot
You are welcome...
-Joseph
==
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:51 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks... I will try it out this weekend. If all goes well, I will add
> > it to GARNOME so others can play with it an provide feedback.
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 14:44 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> The people I work with on java-gnome won't be able to hack on GNOME 2.16
> specific bindings until we have GNOME 2.16 desktops on our systems. My
> systems are otherwise production (in the sense that I use them to do
> business so I can't af
Hi,
> Thanks... I will try it out this weekend. If all goes well, I will add
> it to GARNOME so others can play with it an provide feedback.
Wow ! Nice ! Thank you ! :D
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list
Elijah Newren wrote:
> I used to be firmly in favor of the 6-month cycle, but I found
> Andrew's argument quite convincing and it has turned me into more of a
> fence sitter for now. It isn't yet clear to me that a change would be
> a definite improvement, let alone enough of a benefit to merit th
Thanks... I will try it out this weekend. If all goes well, I will add
it to GARNOME so others can play with it an provide feedback.
-Joseph
==
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:15 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Where is the source???
>
> I pointed t
Hello,
> Where is the source???
I pointed the current projet homepage :
http://home.gna.org/gnomescan/index . Follow the "projet page" link and
you'll be lead to SVN. You can also use tarballs from
http://home.gna.org/gnomescan/download .
However, i released a 0.2.3 (including deutsch translatio
Where is the source???
-Joseph
===
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 15:45 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I am curious to know what the word "flegita" means. Searches using
> > google and dictionaries in three languages didn't
On 08/09/06, Hubert Figuiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 September 2006 08:57, James Henstridge wrote:
> > The real issue with handling development in parallel branches is
> > really complexity of merging. This is an area where Subversion
> > doesn't really buy you much over CVS -- yo
Hello,
> I am curious to know what the word "flegita" means. Searches using
> google and dictionaries in three languages didn't turn up anything which
> looked relevant.
Good question. :) flegita is an esperanto word that mean "cured".
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
__
Hello,
> I sure do! please keep up the hard work, this project got me really
> excited.
Héhé :)
I wrote a RoadMap in the Wiki.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeScanning#head-39b656e3f4fce8abe4bf0da2cee994cffa9b90b8
I'm currently packaging gnomescan for debian/ubuntu.
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
___
> Do you want gnome scan for 2.18 ?
I sure do! please keep up the hard work, this project got me really
excited.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Friday 08 September 2006 08:57, James Henstridge wrote:
> The real issue with handling development in parallel branches is
> really complexity of merging. This is an area where Subversion
> doesn't really buy you much over CVS -- you still need to manually
> keep track of what you merged to do
On 08/09/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your master plan implies branching early and heavily committing to
> both branches for a long time. Reality check: we are still using this
> archaic software called C.V.S.! Branching with that software is
> incredibly complex.
>
Hello all !
Since march, i'm designing and developping a Gnome Scan infrastructure.
See http://home.gna.org/gnomescan/index and Google "gnome scan" search
result in general. I've been sponsored by Google do work on this project
this summer. Mentored by Vincent Untz.
The project is far from integr
On Sex, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:32 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
> > > What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
> >
> > For one thing: the documentation gets
Hi Andrew,
Quoting Andrew Cowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We regularly have people showing up who are asking us questions about
> gtk 2.6 and using a version that is *FOUR* cycles old. We can't support
> that as we've long since moved on from there (shit, the people who wrote
> that code aren't even
I'd like to suggest two ways to print multiple documents easily, since
nowadays it involves opening them one by one which can become
burdensome. Please tell me your opinions about these:
A. we already can send stuff to a bluetooth device through
nautilus-sendto. Wouldn't it be cool to
Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006, à 19:32, Don Scorgie a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
> > What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
>
> For one thing: the documentation gets squeezed. We (the doc team) have,
> basically, 3 month to docume
2006/9/8, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:51 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
> > > release
> > > schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certai
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:51 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
> > release
> > schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certain number of feature
> > that would involve possible inf
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:56 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
> > release
> > schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certain number of feature
> > that would involve possible infrastructure chan
31 matches
Mail list logo