Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
I've re-built AntUnit with -source 1.2 and uploaded everything to
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit/. I'd like to release
those files as 1.0Beta2.
Stefan
+1
Conor
-
To
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+property name=javac.-source value=1.2/
+property name=javac.-target value=1.2/
+property name=javac.debug value=on/
Stefan,
why do you have chosen the name
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer the procedure which I have used for Ant 1.6 and for the
betas of 1.7 to define a release date in the vote thread, and then
to build and publish the release mechanically on the release date.
I may have been a bit
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide
an open source testing framework for the enterprise.
[...]
The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are
planning to open source when we reach
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea is that ant-core code would first check for the language
implementation in bsf and if that (the language or bsf) does not
exist, ant-core will then check for javax.script support for the
language.
Sounds good.
Stefan
Hello Stefan,
OK, maybe this does not comply with ASF procedures.
I see that tomcat seems to be doing releases the same way as what you
suggest and did for the antlib(s):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=115859000312242w=2
This procedure for releases opens for me a number of
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:14 AM
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative by
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40313.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40313.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestLogic is an initiative by BEA Systems Inc. Tools team to provide
an open source testing framework for the enterprise.
[...]
The project is so far a private project on CodeShare. We are
planning to open
I've been updating the war file task with better support for optional
web.xml files. Its been a bit tricky, but I've got a good set of unit
tests. I so love antunit, BTW :)
Here's the current setting
1 -Unless you say needxmlfile=false, the web.xml file is mandatory.
This is compatible
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If there is enough interest we could certainly still create a 1.6
compatible branch.
From this posting I got a reply from Paul King, who explained that
similar asserts are being used in WebTest project and that he would
be interested to learn the outcome of this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: antoine
Date: Sat Oct 28 15:54:48 2006
New Revision: 468781
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468781
Log:
fix for Bugzilla 40722. Was identified as a directory scanning problem.
Added:
ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/types/fileset-test.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Peter Reilly wrote:
I have some pending work on classpaths in script,
there is a number of problems with the current implementation.
1) It does not work for language engines contained in the BSF jar.
This is due to usual classloading delegation issues. This effects
the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36733.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40839.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
22 matches
Mail list logo