On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we want to keep this method in AbstractFileSet :
public synchronized PatternSet mergePatterns(Project p)
Maybe there is something useful in it ?
If it has been added after 1.6.5, we can savely remove it. Any code
would
Hi,
I am pretty sure that Matt will rework my changes.
AbstractFileset#mergePatterns is called from Sync#removeOrphans, so I
could not remove it without changing sync.
Regards,
Antoine
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we want to
Hi,
After the different discussions, I propose to build a distribution on
Sunday, November 5th.
The version returned by ant -version would be 1.7.0RC1 and the tag in
Subversion ANT_170_RC1.
After having built the distribution, I will upload it to my account on
people.apache.org and start a
I'm +1 on this (as in I want to help out after a fairly long awol
period) - let me know if you want me to do anything to lighten the
load Antoine
oh and rc label for this one sounds good too
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hello,
Peter Reilly wrote:
I have some pending work on classpaths in script,
there is a number of problems with the current implementation.
1) It does not work for language engines contained in the BSF jar.
This is due to usual classloading delegation issues. This effects
the
On 10/26/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got the feeling that we are pretty close to releasing 1.7.0.
However I wonder whether we need a beta4 before, particularly due to the
change of refid handling since beta3.
I have some pending work on classpaths in script,
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I have got the feeling that we are pretty close to releasing 1.7.0.
However I wonder whether we need a beta4 before, particularly due to the
change of refid handling since beta3.
I could free a slot for a next concrete release step on Sunday, November
5th.
1.
Hi,
I have got the feeling that we are pretty close to releasing 1.7.0.
However I wonder whether we need a beta4 before, particularly due to the
change of refid handling since beta3.
I could free a slot for a next concrete release step on Sunday, November
5th.
Thoughts ?
Antoine
Thoughts ?
I think there have been enough changes since Beta3 to justify a Beta4.
I know users won't pick it up until it's out of beta officially, but
the changes could affect some things and we don't want to have 1.7.1
out a month later
Kev
