Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-10 Thread Peter . Dudek
> > Plus, I was thinking, should there be support for shortened journal > > names? Like J. Clim. and then every one knows it is the Journal of > > Climatology? Will be very tough to implement though, as I don't think > > there even exists a list with all valid shortenings. Just a thought... > > Ye

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-10 Thread Peter . Dudek
Dear Bruce, I sent a response concerning this issue to dev@bibliographic.openoffice.org, but for some reason it doesn't appear to have gone through (especially noticeable since a few of the list members are having a discussion on the subject several hours after my post to the list). To paraphrase:

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-10 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Matthias Basler wrote: Yes, abbreviations for journal names are quite common. Implementation should not be very difficult. In a simple case each user can him/herself define a replacement (or alias) list (i.e. "Journal of Climatology" -> "J. Clim.") that can be swit

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-10 Thread Matthias Basler
Zitat von Johan Kool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Plus, I was thinking, should there be support for shortened journal > names? Like J. Clim. and then every one knows it is the Journal of > Climatology? Will be very tough to implement though, as I don't think > there even exists a list with all valid sho