Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Irv Salisbury
Wow, this all sounds like lots of fun. We already tried to put cocoon's rhino in the classpath first. I am writing a simple transformer to call the ProtectionDomain stuff to verify where the URL of the jar file it is loading the class from. (Unless someone has already done that) Even though our

HttpHeaderAction broken in 2.1.6?

2005-06-21 Thread Mark Lundquist
Hi, I have an app with the following pipeline: name="Content-Disposition" value="attachment ; filename=pub-template.xslt.xml" /> name="publicationId" value="{request-param:publication-id}" /> In an older instance of the same app using Cocoon 2.1.5, this works fine. LiveHttpHeader

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Gregor J. Rothfuss
Tony Collen wrote: Yep, Weblogic ships with it's own version of Rhino. The solution is to use JavaFlow, I believe. we ended up doing this for WL. i took us about 2 months to get WL working properly, with detours into patching the paranoid classloader to work in an unexploded war [1], variou

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Jason Johnston
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 17:48 -0400, Irv Salisbury wrote: > On 6/21/05, Tony Collen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Irv Salisbury wrote: > > > Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the > > > rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do > > > anything

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Ralph Goers
One other thing. The version of Rhino in 2.1.x almost certainly won't work with weblogic. However, I believe the Rhino version in 2.2 might work better since it comes straight from mozilla. Give that a try (you still need to override weblogics Rhino). Let us know how it goes. Ralph Irv Sa

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Ralph Goers
You can try adding Cocoon's version of Rhino to the classpath before weblogic.jar. However, this may very well cause weblogic itself to have errors, depending on what you are doing. I only experienced problems when I was trying to use weblogic portal (8.1.2). As Tony suggested, you will proba

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35457] New: - RequestGenerator NullPointerException

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Irv Salisbury
On 6/21/05, Tony Collen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Irv Salisbury wrote: > > Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the > > rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do > > anything in flowscript (with our without forms) We get two main > > errors

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Tony Collen
Irv Salisbury wrote: Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do anything in flowscript (with our without forms) We get two main errors: 1. java.lang.ClassCastException: inv1 2. function FOM_WebContinu

Re: Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Irv Salisbury
Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do anything in flowscript (with our without forms) We get two main errors: 1. java.lang.ClassCastException: inv1 2. function FOM_WebContinuation() { [nati

Cocoon 2.1.7 in Weblogic 8.1.4

2005-06-21 Thread Irv Salisbury
We already asked this on the users list, but we are having the worst time getting Cocoon 2.1.7 running in Weblogic 8.1.4. We have only tried on Windows XP at this point. We are getting ClassCastExceptions in xalan at the moment. We have tried various combinations of the ParanoidClassLoader, init

calendar showing up behind tabs using cocoon forms

2005-06-21 Thread Dan Ochs
hi, I'm new to this list and cocoon in general so forgive me, I'm also not sure if this is exactly where I should be posting this. I'm working with cocoon forms and have a setup where there are two tabs, and a reference to the widget? that is used to create a calendar popup on the tab that is init

Re: Transparent and automatic AJAX support for CForms

2005-06-21 Thread Gregor J. Rothfuss
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Don't be! The issue with Safari is that its XMLHttpRequest doesn't seem to consider responses of length zero as valid, which Firefox and IE do. The problem is that fixing this will require to add an additional ajax-specific pipeline in each cforms sitemap, which I would

Re: [Ann/RFC] "Sitemap Blocks"

2005-06-21 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Give me a 3 lines description of where to start looking and I'll get going. A good starting point is the BlocksManager and sitemap component configurations in the test cases: src/test/org/apache/cocoon/test/components/blocks/BlocksManagerTestC

Re: Transparent and automatic AJAX support for CForms

2005-06-21 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Sylvain, I get the same problems with Safari 2.0 (412) with Tiger. This is just a warning for anyone wanting to use this new Ajax stuff for real projects .. this stuff does not degrade gracefully, it just breaks in this browser. Sorry Don't be! The issue wit

Re: Transparent and automatic AJAX support for CForms

2005-06-21 Thread Tony Collen
Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi Sylvain, I get the same problems with Safari 2.0 (412) with Tiger. This is just a warning for anyone wanting to use this new Ajax stuff for real projects .. this stuff does not degrade gracefully, it just breaks in this browser. Could try turning on the Safari d

Re: Transparent and automatic AJAX support for CForms

2005-06-21 Thread Jeremy Quinn
Hi Sylvain, I get the same problems with Safari 2.0 (412) with Tiger. This is just a warning for anyone wanting to use this new Ajax stuff for real projects .. this stuff does not degrade gracefully, it just breaks in this browser. Sorry regards Jeremy On 23 Apr 2005, at 13:47, Sylv

v2 (was Re: [CForms binding] access to model data from repeater row widget)

2005-06-21 Thread Mark Lundquist
On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote: BTW, why do you prefer v2 rather than v1? Honestly I can't remember ATM... :-) I switched a long time ago because (a) I was under the impression that v2 was where the form API was headed, and (b) more importantly, there were specific thin

Re: [CForms binding] access to model data from repeater row widget

2005-06-21 Thread Mark Lundquist
On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote: So in essence, you want to act on the selected rows, right? Yup. I encountered this already, and I've been thinking to explicitely add the selection concept to repeaters. That selection would be defined by a boolean field present on each row.

Re: [Ann/RFC] "Sitemap Blocks"

2005-06-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: >> Give me a 3 lines description of where to start looking and I'll get >> going. > > A good starting point is the BlocksManager and sitemap component > configurations in the test cases: > src/test/org/apache/cocoon/test/components/blocks/BlocksManagerTestCase.xconf. all

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35444] - STX concurrency problem

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-21 Thread Steven Noels
On 17 Jun 2005, at 16:41, Steven Noels wrote: [X] 5/6/7 October (Wed->Fri) -- Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/ Outerthought Open Source Java & XML stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35444] - STX concurrency problem

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35444] - STX concurrency problem

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35444] New: - STX concurrency problem

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35435] - [PATCH] New EnvironmentInputModule

2005-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu