[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [pool] reorganizing pool2.impl package and new possible pool implementations

2010-12-23 Thread Phil Steitz
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Phil, > > >> > >> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl > >> | generic > >> | reference > >> | stack > >> >

Re: [Math] RealVectorFormat and ParseException

2010-12-23 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > > > > To avoid this case, I was wondering whether we could, instead of having > >public class RealVectorFormat extends CompositeFormat { > > // ... > >} > > have > > public class RealVectorFormat { > > CompositeFormat compositeFormat; > > > > // ... > >}

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: >> Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and >> artifacts look good. >> >> +1 >> >> Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and > artifacts look good. > > +1 > > Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit strange. > There is one error, but you do not see any details. Yes,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and artifacts look good. +1 Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit strange. There is one error, but you do not see any details. Am 23.12.2010 05:15, schrieb Niall Pemberton: There have been a

Re: [Math] RealVectorFormat and ParseException

2010-12-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 23/12/2010 14:31, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > Hello. > > While replacing, in "RealVectorFormat", the last occurrence of the old > "o.a.c.math.MathRuntimeException" in package "linear", I stumbled upon the > following: > > 1. "RealVectorFormat" inherits from the standard Java class "Format". >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I > would like to release IO 2.0.1 > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.01.-rc1/

[Math] RealVectorFormat and ParseException

2010-12-23 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. While replacing, in "RealVectorFormat", the last occurrence of the old "o.a.c.math.MathRuntimeException" in package "linear", I stumbled upon the following: 1. "RealVectorFormat" inherits from the standard Java class "Format". 2. That "Format" class has a method public Object parseObj

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2010-12-23 Thread Ralph Goers
On Dec 23, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> > > But the RM should definitely *look at* the generated release notes and, IMO, intentionally committing them is a good thing. Nothing generated

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-12-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2010-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > But the RM should definitely *look at* the generated release notes and, >>> IMO, intentionally committing them is a good thing. Nothing generated >>> directly from maven has ever met my expectations in terms