Re: [math] releasing 3.6 ?

2015-11-04 Thread Phil Steitz
I just want to clean up the mess I made in MATH-1246, ideally actually fixing the issue. I will make another go of it this weekend and if I can't actually fix it, I will back out the dubious fix. If everything else is ready before it is sorted, we can just push the fix version. On 11/4/15 2:13 A

RE: [BCEL] What is status of 6.0 release?

2015-11-04 Thread Mark Roberts
It would most definitely be worth it from our point of view (the Daikon toolset) as we have already rolled our own Java 8 support. Our primary motivation is that we have been using our own updated version of BCEL for years and would love to get back to an official release. Finally, all our code is

Re: [BCEL] What is status of 6.0 release?

2015-11-04 Thread sebb
On 4 November 2015 at 12:38, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 04/11/2015 13:21, sebb a écrit : > >> A fair number of bugs relate to Java8 features - is there any sense in >> releasing an interim version which does not fully support these >> features, but which at least works better for earlier versions

Re: [5/6] [math] Fixed findbugs warning.

2015-11-04 Thread luc
Le 2015-11-04 14:34, Gilles a écrit : On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:20:55 +0100, Gilles wrote: [...] But it was perhaps a bad design choice to have "PairNeuronDouble" implement "Comparable". I propose to use an explicit "Comparator" in order to fix the problem. Good idea! I have done it and pushed

Re: [5/6] [math] Fixed findbugs warning.

2015-11-04 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:20:55 +0100, Gilles wrote: [...] But it was perhaps a bad design choice to have "PairNeuronDouble" implement "Comparable". I propose to use an explicit "Comparator" in order to fix the problem. Good idea! I have done it and pushed it on both master and MATH_3_X branche

Re: [5/6] [math] Fixed findbugs warning.

2015-11-04 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:14:53 +0100, luc wrote: Le 2015-11-04 13:44, Gilles a écrit : On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 18:07:50 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 03/11/2015 15:33, Gilles a écrit : On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:06:50 -, l...@apache.org wrote: Fixed findbugs warning. When defining compareTo, we sh

Re: [5/6] [math] Fixed findbugs warning.

2015-11-04 Thread luc
Le 2015-11-04 13:44, Gilles a écrit : On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 18:07:50 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 03/11/2015 15:33, Gilles a écrit : On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:06:50 -, l...@apache.org wrote: Fixed findbugs warning. When defining compareTo, we should also define equals and hashcode. Project

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Naomi

2015-11-04 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:37:48 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: Here is a tally of the VOTE Commons PMC: +1 from Dave Brosius, Luc Maisonobe, Phil Steitz, Joerg Schaibl, Oliver Heger, Gary Gregory, Niall Pemberton +0 from BenediKt Ritter -0 from -1 from Emmanuel Bourg, Mark Thomas, James Carman Others: -

Re: [5/6] [math] Fixed findbugs warning.

2015-11-04 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 18:07:50 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 03/11/2015 15:33, Gilles a écrit : On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:06:50 -, l...@apache.org wrote: Fixed findbugs warning. When defining compareTo, we should also define equals and hashcode. Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/as

Re: [BCEL] What is status of 6.0 release?

2015-11-04 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 04/11/2015 13:21, sebb a écrit : > A fair number of bugs relate to Java8 features - is there any sense in > releasing an interim version which does not fully support these > features, but which at least works better for earlier versions of > Java? I think that an interim release might be fine,

Re: [BCEL] What is status of 6.0 release?

2015-11-04 Thread sebb
PLEASE IGNORE THIS REPLY, SENT BY MISTAKE. See the second version instead - thanks! On 4 November 2015 at 12:13, sebb wrote: > On 3 November 2015 at 20:18, Mark Roberts wrote: >> I was actively involved in helping with BCEL 6.0 - but everything seems to >> have gone dark for the last couple of

Re: [BCEL] What is status of 6.0 release?

2015-11-04 Thread sebb
Pressed send too early; try again. On 3 November 2015 at 20:18, Mark Roberts wrote: > I was actively involved in helping with BCEL 6.0 - but everything seems to > have gone dark for the last couple of months. > > So, what's going on? I'm afraid that there has been no further work on the code.

Re: [BCEL] What is status of 6.0 release?

2015-11-04 Thread sebb
On 3 November 2015 at 20:18, Mark Roberts wrote: > I was actively involved in helping with BCEL 6.0 - but everything seems to > have gone dark for the last couple of months. > > So, what's going on? I'm afraid that there has been no further work on the code. I made good progress on removing the

Re: [math] releasing 3.6 ?

2015-11-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/04/2015 10:13 AM, luc wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to release 3.6 in the upcoming weeks. > There have been a bunch of bug fixes and a few evolutions that are > important to me. > > I am still working on two things both related to ode: first trying > to stabilize the Adams-BAshforth and

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Naomi

2015-11-04 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/04/2015 03:37 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Here is a tally of the VOTE > > Commons PMC: > +1 from Dave Brosius, Luc Maisonobe, Phil Steitz, Joerg Schaibl, > Oliver Heger, Gary Gregory, Niall Pemberton > +0 from BenediKt Ritter > -0 from > -1 from Emmanuel Bourg, Mark Thomas, James Carman > > Ot

[math] releasing 3.6 ?

2015-11-04 Thread luc
Hi all, I would like to release 3.6 in the upcoming weeks. There have been a bunch of bug fixes and a few evolutions that are important to me. I am still working on two things both related to ode: first trying to stabilize the Adams-BAshforth and Adams-Moulton integrators which sometime get stuc

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Naomi

2015-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
On 04/11/2015 02:37, Phil Steitz wrote: > Here is a tally of the VOTE > > Commons PMC: > +1 from Dave Brosius, Luc Maisonobe, Phil Steitz, Joerg Schaibl, > Oliver Heger, Gary Gregory, Niall Pemberton > +0 from BenediKt Ritter > -0 from > -1 from Emmanuel Bourg, Mark Thomas, James Carman > > Other