On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:06:33 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:emmanuel.bo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Bourg
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:34
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:50:23 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks,
waiting for additional implementations.
Then, please, cancel the stil
How about utility methods for java.lang.invoke? There were also some
additions to java.util.concurrent that can be supported in
lang3.concurrent. I'm sure I'm missing other APIs added to JDK 7, but
there's a couple ideas.
On 22 September 2016 at 16:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/09/2016 à 22:58, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> > - What else?
>
> I think the real question here is what kind of benefit Java 7 can bring
> to the Commons Lang API. Internal clean-up using the new syntax tricks
> isn't really interesting
Le 22/09/2016 à 22:58, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> - What else?
I think the real question here is what kind of benefit Java 7 can bring
to the Commons Lang API. Internal clean-up using the new syntax tricks
isn't really interesting. The benefits of Java 8 are more obvious.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.09.2016 um 20:20 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > I'd like to propose an orderly migration assume BC is preserved:
> >
> > - Release 3.5 RC as scheduled this weekend
> > - Release 3.6 with Java 7 changes
> > - Release 3.7 with Java 8 chang
Am 21.09.2016 um 20:20 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> I'd like to propose an orderly migration assume BC is preserved:
>
> - Release 3.5 RC as scheduled this weekend
> - Release 3.6 with Java 7 changes
> - Release 3.7 with Java 8 changes
>
> This will give us an opportunity to do some Java 7 work and
Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. The site build
failed for me with Java 1.8 because of Javadoc errors, but was
successful with Java 1.7 - not blocking.
Artifacts and site look good. Some minor nits for the site:
- In the changes report I am incorrectly listed as developer for
Bump.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC3)
>
> This should fix earlier Java 6 / Maven 3.0 build issues with RC2 and
> adds a BUILDING.txt
>
> (Tested with Centos 6, Oracle JDK 6 and Maven 3.0.4)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:emmanuel.bo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Emmanuel Bourg
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:34
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])
>
> Le 22/09/2016 à 19:09, Gary G
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:09
> To: Commons Developers List ; Dennis Hamilton
>
> Subject: Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])
>
> Our project LICENSE.txt file is just for th
Le 22/09/2016 à 19:09, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Our project LICENSE.txt file is just for the Apache 2.0 license text.
>
> Other mentions go in the NOTICE.txt file.
That's my understanding too, but there are many counter-examples:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/blob/trunk/LICENSE#L180
https://g
Our project LICENSE.txt file is just for the Apache 2.0 license text.
Other mentions go in the NOTICE.txt file.
For example, see Apache Commons Codec's NOTICE.txt file:
Apache Commons Codec
Copyright 2002-2016 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache
Cleaning up a messy statement ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 09:38
> To: 'Commons Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])
>
>
>
> > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 08:50
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RNG] New implementations before release of 1.0
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> Gilles wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37
> -Original Message-
> From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 04:41
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RNG] License text location(s) (Was: [jira] RNG-18 [...])
>
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:27 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le
Hi Gilles,
Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks,
>>> waiting for additional implementations.
>>
>> Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-)
>
> I'll do
Hello.
Vote cancelled as additional implementations could be shortly
added:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-16
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-17
RC3 will give another chance to those who did not vote for RC2. :-)
Those who did, please don't forget to vote again (sorry f
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:29:37 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks,
waiting for additional implementations.
Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-)
I'll do (the deadline was over anyways).
Gilles
Cheers,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:41:01 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:17, Gilles a écrit :
Reference to Commons Math or to the original code?
The former, I don't think so, the latter is the subject of a
post which I've just sent.
To the original code. I saw the commit before your post.
Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks,
> waiting for additional implementations.
Then, please, cancel the still running vote also ;-)
Cheers,
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:44:27 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:24, Gilles a écrit :
The fact is that we don't distribute the original code (in C)
but a Java port (that has undergone several transformations).
That's still a derivative from the original code.
Sure, but my point
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:24, Gilles a écrit :
> The fact is that we don't distribute the original code (in C)
> but a Java port (that has undergone several transformations).
That's still a derivative from the original code.
> It is confusing to read at times that "Apache only releases sources" and
>
Le 22/09/2016 à 13:17, Gilles a écrit :
> Reference to Commons Math or to the original code?
> The former, I don't think so, the latter is the subject of a
> post which I've just sent.
To the original code. I saw the commit before your post.
We may also want to document the other implementations
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:16:43 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 22/09/2016 à 12:52, Gilles a écrit :
Since Apache releases source code, is it enough to have the
license text in the Java source file?
Or should should a copy of the same license text also appear
in "LICENCE.txt"?
I'm not sure, but
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:13:46 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 22/09/2016 à 12:58, er...@apache.org a écrit :
-Copyright and license statement for the original Mersenne twister C
-routines translated in MersenneTwister class in package
-org.apache.commons.math3.random:
You may want to preserve
Hi.
Release of version 1.0 will be delayed for another two weeks,
waiting for additional implementations.
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-16
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-17
If you intend to try and implement them, please assign the
issue to yourself.
Patches for o
Le 22/09/2016 à 12:52, Gilles a écrit :
> Since Apache releases source code, is it enough to have the
> license text in the Java source file?
> Or should should a copy of the same license text also appear
> in "LICENCE.txt"?
I'm not sure, but I think it should be either in LICENSE.txt or NOTICE.
Le 22/09/2016 à 12:58, er...@apache.org a écrit :
> -Copyright and license statement for the original Mersenne twister C
> -routines translated in MersenneTwister class in package
> -org.apache.commons.math3.random:
You may want to preserve this one though.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:59:20 + (UTC), Emmanuel Bourg (JIRA) wrote:
Emmanuel Bourg created RNG-18:
-
Summary: LICENSE.txt cleanup
Key: RNG-18
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-18
Project:
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> Adding .gitattributes just ensures any future changes will be correct. If
> there are committed files with incorrect line endings in the repo they
> will not be automatically be fixed. I fixed the remaining incorrect files
> in 9e2b2c09732ca596331f7ca34ba4e0f03d70093d.
Adding .gitattributes just ensures any future changes will be correct. If
there are committed files with incorrect line endings in the repo they will
not be automatically be fixed. I fixed the remaining incorrect files
in 9e2b2c09732ca596331f7ca34ba4e0f03d70093d.
Kristian
2016-09-22 8:30 GMT+02:
32 matches
Mail list logo
