This "elder" thinks this is all good, but you *could* rely more on social,
rather than technical, solutions to achieve what you want without needing
Infra assistance. If the concept is introduced in a given project, where
people are given commit rights, with the explicit expectations only to use
it
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Jacques Le Roux
> wrote:
>
> Le 20/08/2020 à 15:08, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:01 PM Harbs wrote:
>>> I also don’t see any harm in making triage rights open to all
>> I suspect creative minds might find a way to spam us with
Dear Apache Development Community Team,
I’ve checked your online resources and helpful tips with regards to upcoming
ASF events.
However, there are still a few questions which would be really helpful in order
for us to prepare for listing us as potential speakers:
* What are you lookin
Le 20/08/2020 à 15:08, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:01 PM Harbs wrote:
I also don’t see any harm in making triage rights open to all
I suspect creative minds might find a way to spam us with this if it's
"open to all" ?
From my experience it always ends like th
+1 for opening to all. I think if anyone wants to abuse anything they can
wreak much havoc by abusive comments etc. It's a far more "attractive"
target than triaging the issue.
And we can always ask INFRA to block abusive users:
https://github.blog/2016-04-04-organizations-can-now-block-abusive-use
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 7:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> If you mean "grant the triage role to anyone with a GitHub account" then +1.
+1 as well here. Or anyone that minimally shows any interest. We should
proactively ask people that are contributing if they would like such status.
-Rob
>
>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:01 PM Harbs wrote:
>
> I also don’t see any harm in making triage rights open to all
I suspect creative minds might find a way to spam us with this if it's
"open to all" ?
For our wikis I think we generally give write access to anyone who
*asks on our mailing lists*
I also don’t see any harm in making triage rights open to all. There’s nothing
destructive at all in the triage permissions, and it opens things up to a bit
more frictionless contributions.
Lowering the bar is good! :-)
Harbs
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
> I was thinkin
I was thinking that we would/should/might follow the permissions philosophy
that we have for cwiki, but allowing anyone to be a Triager would make
administration of it a million times simpler. I would have not any objection to
it.
CTO
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
-Origi
If you mean "grant the triage role to anyone with a GitHub account" then +1.
If you mean create a new level between contributor (i.e. anyone) and
committer then -1.
If you go back (quite a few years) to when Bugzilla was the main issue
tracker for ASF projects it was (and still is for those proje
FYI similar discusion was raised on incubator list:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r497c5bf9a68e631bc93274e65beb3e28b769ce21e55961407adc5d10%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Cheers,
Tomek
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:20 AM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi Members,
>
> One of our (CloudStack) comi
Hi Members,
One of our (CloudStack) comitters has come with a great idea to increase
project contributions...
Traditionally Github has been very binary, you're either a commiter and you
can write to a Repo and perform Issue and Pull Request admin (like add
labels, change status, etc), or you aren
12 matches
Mail list logo
