+1
-Bharath
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp
Sent: 05 June 2009 21:07
To: CXF Dev
Subject: End 2.0.x support/releases?
This may be a "thorny" issue, but I'd like to bring it up and start a
discussion.
July 4th will mark the 2 year anniversary of the CXF 2.0 release. Since
Thanks. I took care of it.
Dan
On Fri June 5 2009 5:56:29 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition:
> org/apache/hello_world_soap_http/types/GreetMeLaterResponse_WrapperTypeHelp
>er1 at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
> at java.la
Next question: Exception mapping. Woodstox throws what it throws, in
the middle of StaxUtils, when this goes off.
I'm trying to figure out how to turn this into a fault.
SchemaValidationTest [JUnit]
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner at
localhost:52320
Hi Sergey,
Yes, I would like to work on integrating your JAX-RS work with the
JAX-WS patch I put together. I'm still very inexperienced with CXF
internals, so I may need a little hand holding.
I took a quick look at JAXRSClientFactory and JAXRSClientFactoryBean.
It looks like these don't sh
java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition:
org/apache/hello_world_soap_http/types/GreetMeLaterResponse_WrapperTypeHelper1
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:675)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineC
Hi
I'm planning to integrate the JAX-RS runtime into DOSGi.
Both JAXRS endpoints and client proxies can be created either from
Spring or programmatically and they can work with JAXB, Aegis, XmlBeans.
First CXF minimal bundle needs to be updated to include
cxf-frontend-jaxrs and depend on
+1
Sergey
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> With 2.2.2 out the door, I think it's probably time to create a 2.2.x fixes
> branch and move trunk to targetting 2.3.
>
> Basically, there are things that should start coming in that are more than
> just "bug fixes" that should
+1
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This may be a "thorny" issue, but I'd like to bring it up and start a
> discussion.
>
> July 4th will mark the 2 year anniversary of the CXF 2.0 release. Since
> then, we have released 11 patches to that branch, along with 2.1 (and 5
>
+1
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> With 2.2.2 out the door, I think it's probably time to create a 2.2.x fixes
> branch and move trunk to targetting 2.3.
>
> Basically, there are things that should start coming in that are more than
> just "bug fixes" that should probabl
This may be a "thorny" issue, but I'd like to bring it up and start a
discussion.
July 4th will mark the 2 year anniversary of the CXF 2.0 release. Since
then, we have released 11 patches to that branch, along with 2.1 (and 5
patches for it) and 2.2 (and 2 patches for it).That's 21 re
With 2.2.2 out the door, I think it's probably time to create a 2.2.x fixes
branch and move trunk to targetting 2.3.
Basically, there are things that should start coming in that are more than
just "bug fixes" that should probably be going toward 2.3. The three
projects from the GSoC folk
Could I push our default dependency to 4.0.3?
12 matches
Mail list logo