You're saying my machine is slow... ;-)
-Flavio
> On 12 Jan 2017, at 16:38, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> Yeah, currently some of the tests are time dependent. So they failed
> sometimes when the machine is slow. There were efforts on improving this
> and will also do this in next release.
>
> Sijie
>
Yeah, currently some of the tests are time dependent. So they failed
sometimes when the machine is slow. There were efforts on improving this
and will also do this in next release.
Sijie
On Jan 12, 2017 3:32 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
> Ok, so I've seen the following test cases showing error
Ok, so I've seen the following test cases showing errors:
TestBKDistributedLogManager.testNumberOfTransactionsWithInprogressAtEnd:325
TestAsyncReaderLock.testReaderLockDlmClosed ยป Cancellation
They don't seem to fail consistently for me, though.
-Flavio
> On 10 Jan 2017, at 18:10, Sijie Guo wr
Liang had a pull request for the assembly issue. Going to cancel this vote
and produce a new RC.
Flavio, what are the tests failed in your case?
Sijie
On Jan 10, 2017 9:10 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" wrote:
Yeah, I can't build because of the same issue:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apach
Yeah, I can't build because of the same issue:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:2.2.1:single (default) on
project distributedlog-service: Failed to create assembly: Error adding file to
archive:
distributedlog-0.4.0-incubating/distribu
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote:
> Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :)
> I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released
> as well, please correct me if i am wrong.
> I can pass this command with current git master code: "mvn clean
> apache-rat:check pac
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion, Khurrum. Comment inline. I'd like to
> collect more feedbacks and then cut another RC.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Khurrum Nasim
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sijie for working on this. A couple of comments:
>>
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote:
> Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :)
> I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released
> as well, please correct me if i am wrong.
>
I was thinking it might be necessary to release tutorials as a separated
bin package.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM, liang xie wrote:
>
>> Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :)
>> I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released
>> as well, please correct me if i am wrong.
>>
>
> I was thinking it mi
yeah, you need a clean repo before running apache-rat:check in master.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:01 PM, liang xie wrote:
> Master issue gone now after checking rat.txt and removing the log
> files generated by privious tests.
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:05 PM, liang xie wrote:
> > oops, "mvn
Master issue gone now after checking rat.txt and removing the log
files generated by privious tests.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:05 PM, liang xie wrote:
> oops, "mvn clean apache-rat:check package findbugs:check -DskipTests"
> failed at the latest master code with another diff err msg:
> Failed to
oops, "mvn clean apache-rat:check package findbugs:check -DskipTests"
failed at the latest master code with another diff err msg:
Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.7:check
(default-cli) on project distributedlog-service: Too many unapproved
licenses: 5
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017
Glad to see 0.4 will be release soon :)
I could not find tutorials package from link[2], it should be released
as well, please correct me if i am wrong.
I can pass this command with current git master code: "mvn clean
apache-rat:check package findbugs:check -DskipTests", but failed with
from distri
Thank you for your suggestion, Khurrum. Comment inline. I'd like to collect
more feedbacks and then cut another RC.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Khurrum Nasim
wrote:
> Thanks Sijie for working on this. A couple of comments:
>
> - do we need to publish artifacts for both scala 2.10 and 2.11
Thanks Sijie for working on this. A couple of comments:
- do we need to publish artifacts for both scala 2.10 and 2.11 (probably
also 2.12)? as DL uses some scala libraries as the dependencies.
- the source jar is also missing. do we need it? it is usually useful to
have a source jar so that peopl
+1 binding.
Build and smoke-test both passed on my local machine.
Thanks a lot for the work.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
> as follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not
Hi all,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
17 matches
Mail list logo