Re: [gogo] Parameter annotations (Re: svn commit: r940514 - in /felix/trunk/gogo/runtime/src/main/java/org/osgi/service/command: Flag.java Option.java)

I guess we should have tried this out in a sandbox but this experiment seems rather harmless for existing users and potentially very powerful. And this experiment is timely because I do have to update RFC 147. Will do different next time :-) On 4 mei 2010, at 08:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > A

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12864167#action_12864167 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-2324: Are you sure multiple values need to be s

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12864139#action_12864139 ] Christopher Blunck commented on FELIX-2324: --- I looked up standardization on execu

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

Really, my guess is that you are running into the same issue as you did the last time namely, the eventadmin contains the org.osgi.service.event package and imports it as well. Do you have the compendium bundle installed (or any other provider of the org.osgi.service.event package)? Remember, subst

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2280) To much code duplication in DefaultJDBCLock, OracleJDBCLock and MySQLJDBCLock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863920#action_12863920 ] Jamie goodyear commented on FELIX-2280: --- Thanks, I'll take a look over this latest p

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2280) To much code duplication in DefaultJDBCLock, OracleJDBCLock and MySQLJDBCLock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Müller updated FELIX-2280: Attachment: FELIX-2280.patch Me again... I provide a new patch (based on the current trunk)

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

But the compiler used is system-dependent. All the source/target bits do is impact what the compiler does, not which compiler is used. If you specify the fork, compilerVersion, and executable properties as I described below, you can use an alternate javac. You can also use a different compiler (se

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863884#action_12863884 ] Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2324: ok. Well, all I am thinking about doing is

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863878#action_12863878 ] Christopher Blunck commented on FELIX-2324: --- I don't know as I'm pretty new to Ka

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863875#action_12863875 ] Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2324: I was thinking about adding this in the de

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2314) Improve logging support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863873#action_12863873 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-2314: Committing to https://svn.apache.org/repos

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2324: --- Fix Version/s: framework-3.0.0 Affects Version/s: framework-2.0.5

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

This is probably the valid explanation: http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/derby-...@db.apache.org/2009-12/msg00072.html "In fact, I believe the bytecode spec changed between 1.4 and 1.5. dx's warning is ba

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

we compile for 1.4 by default. regards, Karl 2010/5/4 Toni Menzel : > then there are at least two broken compilers out in the wild > ;) > > 2010/5/4 Justin Edelson > >> According to the manifest, Carsten, not Karl, built EventAdmin 1.2.2. >> >> On 5/4/10 11:49 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: >> > But i

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

then there are at least two broken compilers out in the wild ;) 2010/5/4 Justin Edelson > According to the manifest, Carsten, not Karl, built EventAdmin 1.2.2. > > On 5/4/10 11:49 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > > But i realized i the warnings just appear when using the stock felix > > 2.0.5 (and other

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

According to the manifest, Carsten, not Karl, built EventAdmin 1.2.2. On 5/4/10 11:49 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > But i realized i the warnings just appear when using the stock felix > 2.0.5 (and other bundles like event admin). > Self built stuff works just fine. > > So Karl, what do you use to bui

[jira] Created: (FELIX-2324) Support execution environment so that OBR works properly

Support execution environment so that OBR works properly Key: FELIX-2324 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2324 Project: Felix Issue Type: Improvement Componen

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

But i realized i the warnings just appear when using the stock felix 2.0.5 (and other bundles like event admin). Self built stuff works just fine. So Karl, what do you use to build the released artifacts ? On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Justin Edelson wrote: > On 5/4/10 10:25 AM, Richard S. Ha

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-2279) Access to ServiceReference in iPOJO service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-2279. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in trunk. Add the post-registration and post-unregistration at

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-2323) Unbind method should not be called during the invalidation process if the invalidation does not come from a service departure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clement Escoffier resolved FELIX-2323. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in trunk. Unbind methods are no more called when the invalidati

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

On 5/4/10 10:25 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 5/4/10 10:19, Jackson, Bruce wrote: >> Yes, that's easier said than done! >> I seem to remember that the was no single place where you could set the >> compiler version to use for building Felix. Is that correct? >> > > You should just be able to

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2318) Possible NPE for jars with null Manifest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863839#action_12863839 ] Marco commented on FELIX-2318: -- Yesterday, I stumbled exactly over this NPE, which was not ver

[jira] Created: (FELIX-2323) Unbind method should not be called during the invalidation process if the invalidation does not come from a service departure

Unbind method should not be called during the invalidation process if the invalidation does not come from a service departure - Key: FELIX-2323

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

On 5/4/10 10:19, Jackson, Bruce wrote: Yes, that's easier said than done! I seem to remember that the was no single place where you could set the compiler version to use for building Felix. Is that correct? You should just be able to edit the Event Admin pom.xml file to include this in its

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

Toni I don't think its an Apple issue. The dx tool works fine for me with no warnings as long as the source is compiled with either 1.5 or 1.6. Thanks Bruce On 04/05/2010 13:22, "Toni Menzel" wrote: > I have the same issues with all Apple SDKs (tried 5 and 6) here. > Lets hope that Google's

Re: [gogo] Parameter annotations (Re: svn commit: r940514 - in /felix/trunk/gogo/runtime/src/main/java/org/osgi/service/command: Flag.java Option.java)

On 5/4/10 10:07, Derek Baum wrote: I'm interested to see how your experiment develops. Meanwhile, an alternative approach to writing RFC-147 commands is presented here: https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53 I'm happy to donate this 500-line Options class to Felix, if there is any int

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

Yes, that's easier said than done! I seem to remember that the was no single place where you could set the compiler version to use for building Felix. Is that correct? On 04/05/2010 12:54, "Karl Pauls" wrote: > And like before, make sure you don't have other messages like "class > resolved by u

Re: [gogo] Parameter annotations (Re: svn commit: r940514 - in /felix/trunk/gogo/runtime/src/main/java/org/osgi/service/command: Flag.java Option.java)

I'm interested to see how your experiment develops. Meanwhile, an alternative approach to writing RFC-147 commands is presented here: https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53 I'm happy to donate this 500-line Options class to Felix, if there is any interest. Derek On 4 May 2010 14:07,

Re: [gogo] Parameter annotations (Re: svn commit: r940514 - in /felix/trunk/gogo/runtime/src/main/java/org/osgi/service/command: Flag.java Option.java)

On 5/4/10 2:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote: A few things that would be missing imho to make that interesting: * parameters annotation to mark parameters as optional or multi-valued Currently, flags are always optional, whereas options are only optional if a default value is specified. We hav

Re: [VOTE] Release fileinstall 3.0.0 (2nd try)

+1 (non-binding) Jamie On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Freeman > On 2010-5-1, at 下午3:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: >> >> fileinstall 3.0.0 >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.a

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

I have the same issues with all Apple SDKs (tried 5 and 6) here. Lets hope that Google's not dissing Apple Java this way. So far it let to not more than those warn messages produced by dx. Toni On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > And like before, make sure you don't have other

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2292) Uprage to jetty 7.0 (org.eclipse.jetty 7.0.2v20100331)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863779#action_12863779 ] Rob Walker commented on FELIX-2292: --- Ok - both the new (jetty) and old (http.jetty) imple

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

And like before, make sure you don't have other messages like "class resolved by unexpected dex" in the log ... regards, Karl On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > Well, this should be easy enough to test, right? Just re-compile the > eventadmin and see whether that fixes the issu

Re: Felix compiler version & Android dx

Well, this should be easy enough to test, right? Just re-compile the eventadmin and see whether that fixes the issue or not - if it does, that would be really useful to know :-) regards, Karl On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jackson, Bruce wrote: > Hi All > > Some time back, we had a discussion

Felix compiler version & Android dx

Hi All Some time back, we had a discussion about the default compiler version used to build Felix, and whether this was compatible with the requirements of Android. I noted that when you dx the bundle jars produced by the regular Felix build, you get a whole collection of warning of the the for

Re: Is it just me to gets the maven-bundle-plugin build error?

I think that's because bundlerepository 1.6.2 is being released and bundle plugin 2.1.0 too. In order to do that, i had to upgrade bundleplugin to use bundlerepository 1.6.2 which is not available yet. So yeah, building the bundlerepository snapshot and using it instead of the released version is

Is it just me to gets the maven-bundle-plugin build error?

Whenever I clean build I get this error? Guessing it must just be my local setup. The version ssems out of sync i.e the current OBR is 1.6.3, but the bundleplugin is asking for 1.6.2. Even if I change this though I still get the error unless I manually install the newly built OBR to my local ma

Re: [VOTE] Release fileinstall 2.0.10, gogo 0.4.0, bundlerepository 1.6.2, bundleplugin 2.1.0

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Freeman On 2010-4-30, at 上午2:47, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: fileinstall 2.0.10 gogo 0.4.0 bundlerepository 1.6.2 bundleplugin 2.1.0 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgap

Re: [VOTE] Release fileinstall 3.0.0 (2nd try)

+1 (non-binding) Freeman On 2010-5-1, at 下午3:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: fileinstall 3.0.0 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-039/ You can use this UNIX script to download the r

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2292) Uprage to jetty 7.0 (org.eclipse.jetty 7.0.2v20100331)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863712#action_12863712 ] Rob Walker commented on FELIX-2292: --- Thinking about this some more - I wonder if there is

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-2292) Uprage to jetty 7.0 (org.eclipse.jetty 7.0.2v20100331)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863697#action_12863697 ] Rob Walker commented on FELIX-2292: --- I'm working in this area at present, so if everyone