On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:27:40AM -0700, Chris Elving wrote:
> sed is an inherently line-oriented editor. It seems wrong to buffer
> multiple lines within libsed. Consider, for example, how adding such
> multi-line buffering to libsed would complicate implementing an
> interactive sed like sed(
Folks
Here's the patch to get this to compile correctly with gcc 4. It's
actually only 3 lines. This has been tested with the following
versions:
gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-8), (RHEL4 32-bit)
gcc version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-52) (RHEL4 64-bit)
Thanks,
Guy
--
Guy Fer
On 04/17/2008 10:10 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I am frankly open here: The old code already looked ugly in respect of
this and
the new code IMHO even looks uglier. What about the following patch
Of course I forgot a :-) here.
Regards
Rüdiger
Trunk should now build again.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 04/17/2008 07:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hmmm httpd-trunk, apr-trunk and apr-util-trunk up to date, and
yet:
mod_session_crypto.c:20:66: error: apr_ssl.h: No such file or directory
mod_session_crypto.c:60: error: syntax error before 'a
On 04/17/2008 09:39 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Style police. No functional changes.
Are you using .indent.pro ? If so - which one ?
No, I am using the following .vimrc settings which
I took over from Justin:
syntax enable
" Added ent
On 04/17/2008 09:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Apr 17 12:20:16 2008
New Revision: 649239
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649239&view=rev
Log:
handle ? in cases where nocanon is in effect
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c
httpd/http
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Style police. No functional changes.
Are you using .indent.pro ? If so - which one ?
Thanks,
Dw
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log:
> handle ? in cases where nocanon is in effect
Lovely - this fixes one of my ajp problems as well (which I thus wrongly
was blaming on the cache).
Is this now hooked in everywhere ? Or do we still need to do a scan
throughout everything ?
Dw
On 04/17/2008 06:48 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
I *think* that the patch below is the right thing to do throughout
(rather than
just in mod_cache itself):
-always merge in any error headers *prior* to removing
hop-by-hop.
-always clearing the errors.
When you are passing ou
These just make noncanon available for knowledge use... How
that is actually handled is additional stuff (see other thread :) )
On Apr 17, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/17/2008 06:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Apr 17 09:24:16 2008
New Revision: 649170
On 04/17/2008 06:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Apr 17 09:24:16 2008
New Revision: 649170
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649170&view=rev
Log:
and make mod_proxy_fcgi also nocanon aware
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fcgi.c
Modified: http
Hmmm httpd-trunk, apr-trunk and apr-util-trunk up to date, and
yet:
mod_session_crypto.c:20:66: error: apr_ssl.h: No such file or
directory
mod_session_crypto.c:60: error: syntax error before
'apr_evp_factory_t'
mod_session_crypto.c:61: warning: function declaration isn't a
protot
I *think* that the patch below is the right thing to do throughout
(rather than
just in mod_cache itself):
- always merge in any error headers *prior* to removing
hop-by-hop.
- always clearing the errors.
When you are passing out a cached header set. But would love to have
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
But sure this could be also fixed in the appropriate canon_handler
hooks of mod_proxy_http and mod_proxy_ajp.
That's what I'm wondering... Treating this "special" inside
of mod_
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This section is the same as that in the bug report (make mod_proxy_ajp
aware of the nocanon EnvVar), but the attached patch also includes
a workaround for the doubling of any query strings. This 2nd part
needs to be addressed but the real fix may not be done by
this patch. If
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can you try:
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c
===
--- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c(revision 648735)
+++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c(working copy)
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jess Holle
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 16:50
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
>
> Jess Holle wrote:
> > Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> Can you try:
> >>
> >> Index: modules/proxy/mod_prox
Jess Holle wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can you try:
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c
===
--- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c(revision 648735)
+++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c(working copy)
@@ -72,8 +72,13 @@
sea
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can you try:
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c
===
--- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c(revision 648735)
+++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c(working copy)
@@ -72,8 +72,13 @@
search = r->args;
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
But sure this could be also fixed in the appropriate canon_handler
hooks of mod_proxy_http and mod_proxy_ajp.
That's what I'm wondering... Treating this "special" inside
of mod_proxy itself, when it's really a protocol issue (and
w
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to get a core dump out of an RHEL5 system, and I am struggling to
do so.
Following the instructions at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#crashes, I have set "ulimit -c
unlimited", and I set CoreDumpDirectory to /tmp, b
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Jagielski
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 15:16
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
> > But the patch I just attached t
On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
But the patch I just attached to PR44803 should fix this:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21826
:)
Obviously, +1 on the mod_proxy_ajp patch (within minutes
we had the same idea). Mulling over the impacts of the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Yeah, but we *should* differentiate between the 2. There are (well,
should be) administrative status and "runtime" status.
It worked initially, but someone added PROXY_WORKER_STOPPED to
PROXY_WORKER_IS_USABLE
On Apr 17, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 14:19
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Centralizing http-proxy knowledge in cache_util.c
On Apr 17, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Plüm, Rüdi
John Zhang wrote:
I am using apache 2.0/2.2, in my output filter, I
would like to have the ability to redirect. Some
tests indicated that I can redirect to a page on the
same site, but not to an external site.
Here is my code for redirect:
char* location =
apr_table_get(r->headers_out, "Lo
On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 14:49
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: low hanging fruit in proxy_balancer
One of our class attendees this week had an interesting sug
On Apr 16, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Christoph Dorn wrote:
I was wondering if it would be useful for a lot of mod_rewrite users
to
be able to view the rewrite log in their Firebug console instead of
...
There could be a new configuration directive for mod_rewrite that
enables the sending of the rewri
On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
One of our class attendees this week had an interesting suggesting for
a balancer-manager feature. Right now each member is a 2-state,
either
enabled or disabled.
For session stickiness, he suggested a tristate third option to bleed
o
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 14:49
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: low hanging fruit in proxy_balancer
>
> One of our class attendees this week had an interesting suggesting for
> a balancer-manager feature. Right
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
IMHO we already forward them escaped. The problem is that things get
unescaped first and for reserved characters like ';' this process
cannot be reverted. So if the original URL contained an escaped ';'
the forwarded one
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
IMHO we already forward them escaped. The problem is that things get
unescaped first and for reserved characters like ';' this process
cannot be reverted. So if the original URL contained an escaped ';'
the forwarded one
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 14:19
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Centralizing http-proxy knowledge in cache_util.c
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>
> > What is this func
One of our class attendees this week had an interesting suggesting for
a balancer-manager feature. Right now each member is a 2-state, either
enabled or disabled.
For session stickiness, he suggested a tristate third option to bleed
out the remaining sessions, dispatching no /new/ sessions into
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jess Holle
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 13:59
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
>
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >> IMHO we already forward them escaped. The problem is that
> things g
On Apr 17, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
What is this function (ap_cache_cacheable_hdrs)? I am trying to get
confused
by all these functions which sound very similar :-).
Basically I try to rationalize it to:
1) ap_cache_cacheable_hdrs
Understands the gene
Hi all,
I am trying to get a core dump out of an RHEL5 system, and I am
struggling to do so.
Following the instructions at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#crashes, I have set "ulimit
-c unlimited", and I set CoreDumpDirectory to /tmp, but with no luck.
Is there some further magi
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: jean-frederic clere
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 13:39
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
>
> Plüm wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> >> Von: jean-frederic clere
jean-frederic clere wrote:
IMHO we already forward them escaped. The problem is that things get
unescaped first and for reserved characters like ';' this process
cannot be reverted. So if the original URL contained an escaped ';'
the forwarded one will contain a literal ';'.
With mod_proxy or bet
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 13:05
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Centralizing http-proxy knowledge in cache_util.c
>
> Before I give the other modules a pass over -- does below strawman
> address everyones
> c
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 11:02
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski
(Resent - previous patch also contained the module changes).
Before I give the other modules a pass over -- does below strawman
address everyones
concerns w.r. to the API changes ?
To recap:
- ap_cache_cacheable_hdrs_out gets depricated. And the repliced
code is to be removed f
Before I give the other modules a pass over -- does below strawman
address everyones
concerns w.r. to the API changes ?
To recap:
- ap_cache_cacheable_hdrs_out gets depricated. And the repliced
code is to be removed from mod_*_cache.
- a ap_cache_cacheable_hdrs_in() and ap
A while ago - the build-more changes to cache where committed - but the
similar changes to proxy where not.
Any objections to do so ? Or is there a worry I've missed ?
Dw
Index: modules/proxy/config.m4
===
--- modules/proxy/config.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 12:36
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
>
> Plüm wrote:
> > IMHO we already forward them escaped. The problem is that t
Plüm wrote:
IMHO we already forward them escaped. The problem is that things get
unescaped first and for reserved characters like ';' this process
cannot be reverted. So if the original URL contained an escaped ';'
the forwarded one will contain a literal ';'.
With mod_proxy or better ProxyPass y
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I have looked to #44803 in fact we need something like JkOptions
+ForwardURIEscaped which means something that requires changes in both
mod_rewrite and mod_proxy.
I will propose a patch soon.
Thank you!
--
Jess Holle
Steve Yen posted this link on the memcached mailing list the
other day:
http://www.ssrc.ucsc.edu/Papers/weil-sc06.pdf
well worth a read - and seems to take out most downsides of
(lib)ketama its method. This may well be the (one) generic
hasher apr/mod_*_cache needs.
Thanks,
Dw
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 11:02
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9 (Was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Time Based Releases)
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Jim Ja
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Plus, every 3 months would coincide with the report-to-board cycle,
making it easier for everyone to follow :) Next is due in May, so
if we release thi
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could go along with switching the default merging rule from OR to AND,
> even within a dir block. The reason why it is OR today was basically for
> backward compatibility. Since there really wasn't any kind of logic
51 matches
Mail list logo
