> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 May 2002 00:09
> >> Well then why are the patches in the tree??? I'm not sure I like the
> >> idea of
> >> tagging and then tagging just some files. Seems like if we haven't got a
> >> stable HEAD we shouldn't be tagging. We got into
> >> Well then why are the patches in the tree??? I'm not sure I like the
> >> idea of
> >> tagging and then tagging just some files. Seems like if we haven't got a
> >> stable HEAD we shouldn't be tagging. We got into this whole business of
> >> tagging often as a way of avoiding having this sor
>> Well then why are the patches in the tree??? I'm not sure I like the
>> idea of
>> tagging and then tagging just some files. Seems like if we haven't got a
>> stable HEAD we shouldn't be tagging. We got into this whole business of
>> tagging often as a way of avoiding having this sort of thing
> > > It looks like you picked up practically all the changes. Why not just
> > > retag 2.0.37?
>
> I'm +1 for this...
>
> > You mean, tag HEAD as 2.0.37?
> > I didn't want to do that since there were changes I didn't want in there.
> > Practically all the changes is just about right ;)
>
> Well
> From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 April 2002 10:31
>>> It looks like you picked up practically all the changes. Why not just
>>> retag 2.0.37?
>
> I'm +1 for this...
>
>> You mean, tag HEAD as 2.0.37?
>> I didn't want to do that since there were changes I didn't want in
> > It looks like you picked up practically all the changes. Why not just
> > retag 2.0.37?
I'm +1 for this...
> You mean, tag HEAD as 2.0.37?
> I didn't want to do that since there were changes I didn't want in there.
> Practically all the changes is just about right ;)
Well then why are the
* Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > > I hope to finish testing and commit a change to apxs.in (patch posted
> > > Friday) to finish up a set of fixes to allow apxs to work from a
> > > binary build.
Sander Striker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am bumping tags today. There have been a number of commits since
> the tag that should make it to release IMO. Actually, most of them
> should go in.
[...]
> It would be nice if we could bump daedalus to the new tag and give
>
Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > I hope to finish testing and commit a change to apxs.in (patch posted
> > Friday) to finish up a set of fixes to allow apxs to work from a
> > binary build. It would be nice if that works in the next release.
>
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
> > Sent: 29 April 2002 13:23
>
> > "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I am bumping tags today. There have been a number of commits since
> > > the tag that should ma
* Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am bumping tags today. There have been a number of commits since
> > the tag that should make it to release IMO.
>
> I hope to finish testing and commit a
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
> Sent: 29 April 2002 13:23
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am bumping tags today. There have been a number of commits since
> > the tag that sh
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am bumping tags today. There have been a number of commits since
> the tag that should make it to release IMO.
I hope to finish testing and commit a change to apxs.in (patch posted
Friday) to finish up a set of fixes to all
Hi,
I am bumping tags today. There have been a number of commits since
the tag that should make it to release IMO. Actually, most of them
should go in. Files marked with a [T] will have their tag bumped.
Files marked with [-] won't. I have included the logs of the changes
for
15 matches
Mail list logo
