I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging
fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball in very
early October so it's truly out of sight, out of mind by ApacheCon.
Of course I'd love help - does 2 weeks sound reasonable to everyone?
I'd also like to tag 2
On 9/24/2010 12:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging
> fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball in very
> early October so it's truly out of sight, out of mind by ApacheCon.
> Of course I'd love help - does 2 w
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 12:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging
>> fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball in very
>> early October so it's truly out of sigh
On 10/5/2010 3:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 9/24/2010 12:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging
>>> fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball
On 11.10.2010 20:35, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
... and tagged 0.9. Note 0.9 -util tag already failed on Darwin and we are
holding 2.0 tag for a bundled expat for -util fix. There are four backport
bullets in 2.0 STATUS with two signoffs already, if anyone has eyeballs to
invest between now and
