Edoardo Comar
> >
> > IBM Event Streams
> >
> >
> > Edoardo Comar wrote on 13/12/2018 17:50:30:
> >
> > > From: Edoardo Comar
> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > > Date: 13/12/2018 17:50
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-39
on 13/12/2018 17:50:30:
>
> > From: Edoardo Comar
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 13/12/2018 17:50
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-391: Allow Producing with Offsets for
> > Cluster Replication
> >
> > Hi,
> > as we haven't
gt; To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 13/12/2018 17:50
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-391: Allow Producing with Offsets for
> Cluster Replication
>
> Hi,
> as we haven't got any more feedback, we'd like to start a vote on
KIP-391
> on Monda
ams
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
Edoardo Comar/UK/IBM wrote on 10/12/2018 10:20:06:
> From: Edoardo Comar/UK/IBM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 10/12/2018 10:20
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-391: Allow Producing with Offsets for
> Cluster Replication
>
> (shameless b
(shameless bump) any additional feedback is welcome ... thanks!
Edoardo Comar wrote on 27/11/2018 15:35:09:
> From: Edoardo Comar
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 27/11/2018 15:35
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-391: Allow Producing with Offsets for
> Cluster Replication
>
request where all the
data
> > > is to be assumed with offset,
> > > or all without offsets, seems to suffice,
> > > So we added only a toplevel flag, not a per-topic-partition one.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your interest !
> > > cheers
> > > Edo
> >
because
> > of
> > > > > > invalid offsets.
> > > > > > Same if two producers were sending with offsets, likely both
would
> > > > then
> > > > > > fail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does it make sense t
t; Edo
> > --------------
> >
> > Edoardo Comar
> >
> > IBM Event Streams
> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> >
> >
> > Stanislav Kozlovski wrote on 22/11/2018
22:32:42:
> >
> > > Fr
gt;
> > > > > > Does it make sense to *lock* the topic from other producers while
> > > there
> > > > > is
> > > > > > one that uses offsets?
> > > > >
> > > > > You could do that with ACL permissions if you
o the ACL, do
> we
> > > > need
> > > > > the `use_offset` field in the produce request? Maybe we make it
> > > > mandatory
> > > > > for produce requests with that ACL to have offsets.
> > > >
> > > > The flag is ne
Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
> Stanislav Kozlovski wrote on 22/11/2018 22:32:42:
>
> > From: Stanislav Kozlovski
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 22/11/2018 22:33
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-391: Allow Producing with Offsets for
> > Cluster Repl
& Mickael
> >
> > ----------------------
> >
> > Edoardo Comar
> >
> > IBM Event Streams
> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> >
> >
> > Stanislav Kozlovski wrote on 22/11/2018
16:17:11:
> >
&
--
>
> Edoardo Comar
>
> IBM Event Streams
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
> Stanislav Kozlovski wrote on 22/11/2018 16:17:11:
>
> > From: Stanislav Kozlovski
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 22/11/20
---
Edoardo Comar
IBM Event Streams
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
Stanislav Kozlovski wrote on 22/11/2018 16:17:11:
> From: Stanislav Kozlovski
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date: 22/11/2018 16:17
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-391: Allow Producing with Offsets for
Hey Edurdo, thanks for the KIP!
I have some questions, apologies if they are naive:
Is this intended to work for a single producer use case only?
How would it work if two producers were producing to the same topic with
offsets?
How would it work if two producers, one with offsets and one without w
Hi,
we've opened a KIP to improve data replication between Kafka clusters :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-391%3A+Allow+Producing+with+Offsets+for+Cluster+Replication
We'd like to start a discussion, please post your feedback in this thread.
Thank you
Edo and Mickael
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
