Thanks everyone for voting.
KIP-157 has passed with +3 binding (Ewen, Jason and Guozhang Wang) and +3
non-binding (Matthias J. Sax and Bill Bejeck)
Thanks,
Bharat Viswanadham
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Bharat,
>
> I think we already have 3
Bharat,
I think we already have 3 committers voted on this KIP, could you conclude
the thread?
Guozhang
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Thanks. +1
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
>
Thanks. +1
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for updating the KIP!
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 6/1/17 6:18 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang
>
+1
Thanks for updating the KIP!
-Matthias
On 6/1/17 6:18 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
>> +1 again. Thanks.
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev
>> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 again. Thanks.
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both
> Admin
> >
+1 again. Thanks.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 PM, BigData dev
wrote:
> Hi All,
> Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both Admin
> Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
> command-config option, similar to other
Hi All,
Updated the KIP, as the consumer configurations are required for both Admin
Client and Consumer in Stream reset tool. Updated the KIP to use
command-config option, similar to other tools like kafka-consumer-groups.sh
+1. Thanks!
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska
wrote:
> +1 thanks.
>
> Eno
> > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> > start the
Hi Matthias,
For the AdminClient, client configuration is needed. And for zookeeper, no
properties are required.
So, in other tools like consumerGroupCommand, they used the command config
option.
I think consumer-config and consumer-property are not required here. We
will use the configurations
Couple of follow ups.
The reset tool uses AdminClient, ZkUtils, and a KafkaConsumer
internally. Thus, I am wondering if we need the possibility to specify
configs for all of them?
The original JIRA reported, that the reset tool does not work for a
secured cluster, and thus, I doubt that consumer
Thanks for the info, Matthias.
Regards,
Bharat
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
> is strict.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
KIP-157 cannot be included in 0.11.0.0 anymore. KIP freeze date deadline
is strict.
-Matthias
On 5/19/17 10:15 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across all
> tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be
Hi Matthias,
I will start a new KIP for Kafka tools options to be a standard across all
tools shortly. But I think the KIP 157 for Kafka Streams, should be needed
for 0.11.0.0 release, (KIP freeze date is already over, but I think this is
minor code change in tools to add option to streams reset
I double checked with Matthew Warhaftig (the original author of KIP-14)
and he has not interest to continue the KIP atm.
Thus, Bharat can continue the work on KIP-14. I think it would be best,
to start a new DISCUSS thread after you update KIP-14.
Thanks for your contributions!
-Matthias
On
Hi,
When I was trying to find more info, there is already a proposed KIP for
this
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-14+-+Tools+Standardization
Thanks,
Bharat
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, BigData dev
wrote:
> Hi Ewen, Matthias,
> For common
Hi Ewen, Matthias,
For common configuration across all the tools, I will work on that as part
of other KIP by looking into all Kafka tools.
Thanks,
Bharat
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the
+1
I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
parameters over all tools would be great!
-Matthias
On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> I mentioned this in
+1
On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>
> > KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools
+1 (binding)
I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so
additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
I think it would be
+1 thanks.
Eno
> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
> streams reset tool
>
>
Hi All,
Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
streams reset tool
*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
21 matches
Mail list logo