On 15 Sep 06, at 4:06 PM 15 Sep 06, Ralph Goers wrote:
OK. Could someone apply the patch I provided for http://
jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1577 and verify it?
If you add tests I will apply it. I don't have time to check it and
verify it right now. A test would expedite the review of thi
Oups sorry, I was playing with too many terminals... and using the only
one that was not closed since I set PATH variable.
Julien Henry a écrit :
Hi,
I try to run a simple command from the provider :
mvn scm:checkout -DconnectionUrl=scm:synergy:BGZBFZH~1 -X
...
[DEBUG] Configuring mojo
'or
Julien Henry a écrit :
Hi,
I try to run a simple command from the provider :
mvn scm:checkout -DconnectionUrl=scm:synergy:BGZBFZH~1 -X
...
[DEBUG] Configuring mojo
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-plugin:1.0-SNAPSHOT:checkout' -->
[DEBUG] (f) basedir = D:\tmp
[DEBUG] (s) checkoutDirector
Hi,
I try to run a simple command from the provider :
mvn scm:checkout -DconnectionUrl=scm:synergy:BGZBFZH~1 -X
...
[DEBUG] Configuring mojo
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-plugin:1.0-SNAPSHOT:checkout' -->
[DEBUG] (f) basedir = D:\tmp
[DEBUG] (s) checkoutDirectory = D:\tmp\target\checkout
That looks ok. We should have a LICENSE.txt in the root folder of the
plugin that contains that.
- Brett
On 15/09/2006, at 11:25 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
2006/9/15, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is this really appropriately licensed to include, even though its in
a test case?
I thi
OK. Could someone apply the patch I provided for
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1577 and verify it?
Ralph
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Is not that we don't want to see that fixed, but we're very busy. A
patch would help to get it solved earlier.
---
Brett Porter wrote:
On 14/09/2006, at 6:09 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Hi Team,
Yesterday I've committed some code to enable cancelling builds:
Great!
- What's the best place to place the cancel build button? Perhaps
just list the job on the summary page as 'current job'
(in the fu
2006/9/15, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is this really appropriately licensed to include, even though its in
a test case?
I think we could. See http://www.antlr.org/grammar//cgram/license.txt
We could provide the license file. WDYT?
Or we could use another grammar files with another licen
Is this really appropriately licensed to include, even though its in
a test case?
On 15/09/2006, at 11:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added: maven/plugins/trunk/maven-antlr-plugin/src/test/resources/
unit/java-grammar-inheritance-test/src/main/antlr/GnuCParser.g
URL: http://svn.apache.org/vi