Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Jun 07, at 11:37 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 9:57 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: So before I write something down that's more to the point than an enumeration of the flaws in the current implementation and the problems it gives

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 9:57 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: So before I write something down that's more to the point than an enumeration of the flaws in the current implementation and the problems it gives us, I'd like to get concensus about the proper way to do it.

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Jun 07, at 9:57 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: So before I write something down that's more to the point than an enumeration of the flaws in the current implementation and the problems it gives us, I'd like to get concensus about the proper way to do it.. People won't pay a

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 16 Jun 07, at 1:18 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, where's the spec for this? I'm working on MNG-2651 and similar, and I'm a bit at a loss as how to proceed. What does the 'env.' prefix do? System props, env props, or project props? Should 'pom.' be

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Ralph Goers wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: This somewhat describes the situation: - depMgt for artifact X is used to provide defaults for direct dependencies of artifact X, and for overrides of transitive dependencies on X, unless there's also a direct dependency on X in which case the di

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Jörg Schaible wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, Just did some test wrt MNG-2340 (using maven 2.0.7 and 2.0.6), and this is what I found: P with dependencyManagement for lucene 1.3 | + my-dep with dependency on lucene 1.4.3 + my-app with dependency on my-dep (I modified the attached projec

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brian E. Fox wrote: I think you're questioning if you have this: foo com 1 foo com 2 Should you get 1 or 2? Without the direct dependency, you should get 1 if pulled in transitively. With the direct dependency as shown, you should get 2. I think you al

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Ralph Goers
Kenney Westerhof wrote: This somewhat describes the situation: - depMgt for artifact X is used to provide defaults for direct dependencies of artifact X, and for overrides of transitive dependencies on X, unless there's also a direct dependency on X in which case the direct dependency is us

Re: Deployed attached snapshot artifacts have version number one higher than expected.

2007-06-16 Thread Mark Donszelmann
Hi Kenney, your solution worked fine (in 2.0.6). The problem also existed in 2.0.5. I must have created and attached the Artifact wrongly. bedankt Mark On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:19 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, haven't tested this myself with 2.0.6, but take a look at some other plugins that

Re: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Kenney Westerhof wrote: > Hi, > > Just did some test wrt MNG-2340 (using maven 2.0.7 and 2.0.6), and this is > what I found: > > P with dependencyManagement for lucene 1.3 > | > + my-dep with dependency on lucene 1.4.3 > + my-app with dependency on my-dep > > (I modified the attached project lo

Re: Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 16 Jun 07, at 1:18 AM 16 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, where's the spec for this? I'm working on MNG-2651 and similar, and I'm a bit at a loss as how to proceed. What does the 'env.' prefix do? System props, env props, or project props? Should 'pom.' be the same as 'project.'

RE: depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Brian E. Fox
I think you're questioning if you have this: foo com 1 foo com 2 Should you get 1 or 2? Without the direct dependency, you should get 1 if pulled in transitively. With the direct dependency as shown, you should get 2. I think you always need to maintain t

Re: Adding wildcards to IncludesArtifactFilter

2007-06-16 Thread John Casey
Just another pointer to add. I've put together some wildcard filtering support for the assembly plugin, and factored it into a separate library so I could share it with the maven-repository- builder project. These wildcard-enabled filters are by no means perfect, but if you're interested in

depMgt (mng-1577 again....)

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, Just did some test wrt MNG-2340 (using maven 2.0.7 and 2.0.6), and this is what I found: P with dependencyManagement for lucene 1.3 | + my-dep with dependency on lucene 1.4.3 + my-app with dependency on my-dep (I modified the attached project locally; rename my-app to my-dep and add my-ap

Expression evaluation

2007-06-16 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, where's the spec for this? I'm working on MNG-2651 and similar, and I'm a bit at a loss as how to proceed. What does the 'env.' prefix do? System props, env props, or project props? Should 'pom.' be the same as 'project.' or should one use the Model and the other MavenProject? If someone