Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 I got some minor issues with the distribution packages, but nothing stopping this release. Otherwise, I think it's looking good. /niklas

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/13/10 10:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 I got some minor issues with the distribution packages, but nothing stopping this release. Otherwise, I think it's looking good. yes, we could do better. Like Ni

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

I think we should also try to make the tests stable. Hudson builds on windows seem to be failing more than they pass. It took us a very long time to reach 2.0.0. That's why I wonder if we shouldn't spend just a little more time to get these things right ? Hmm, on the other hand, we could start app

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote: I think we should also try to make the tests stable. Hudson builds on windows seem to be failing more than they pass. It took us a very long time to reach 2.0.0. That's why I wonder if we shouldn't spend just a little more time to get these things rig

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

> > Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review issues in more > details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10670&styleName=Html&version=12313701 > > A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not > approved): > https

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >  On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote: > Then 30 minutes later, it passes. I have no idea why it behaves this > way, but this is systematic, and not only for MINA, but also for Vysper, > FtpServer and so on. This is not true, at l

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > The default mvn install does not build w/out the artifacts created from the > serial profile.  Is that by design? I had the same problem, but forgot to add a JIRA issue for it. Now fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-798

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > On 9/13/10 10:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny >> wrote: >> >>> [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 >>> >> I got some minor issues with the distribution packages, but nothing >> stopping t

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/14/10 9:16 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: On 9/13/10 11:43 PM, Maarten Bosteels wrote: Then 30 minutes later, it passes. I have no idea why it behaves this way, but this is systematic, and not only for MINA, but also for Vysper, Ft

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/14/10 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review issues in more details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10670&styleName=Html&version=12313701 A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vo

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/14/10 9:22 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: The default mvn install does not build w/out the artifacts created from the serial profile. Is that by design? I had the same problem, but forgot to add a JIRA issue for it. Now fixed: https

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > I think we just have to remove the part for this distribution > module to get the build working as it was. +1, this probably also requires adding the "mina-transport-serial" module to the list of modules in the distribution profile. /

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

I have the same trouble building here. Julien Le Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:29:51 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > On 9/14/10 3:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review > >> issues in more details: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/se

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/14/10 11:08 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: I think we just have to remove the part for this distribution module to get the build working as it was. +1, this probably also requires adding the "mina-transport-serial" module to the l

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > The serial profile has been added as we don't want users to get a bin > including the rxtx parts, as it's LGPL. Right now, I'm questionning this > choice, at least for the Java part of it, as soon as we don't deliver the > rxtx lib with

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/14/10 1:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: The serial profile has been added as we don't want users to get a bin including the rxtx parts, as it's LGPL. Right now, I'm questionning this choice, at least for the Java part of it, as s

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice > already ? (just wondering) But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar would be downloaded by running "mvn -Pdistribute install". Don't t

Fwd: Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On 9/14/10 1:49 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Shouldn't we consider the download of the rxtx.jar as an active choice >> already ? (just wondering) > But, with how I proposed earlier (which I now think is wrong) rxtx.jar > would be d

Re: Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > So to be clear : - the bin won't contain anything related to > serial (no rxtx jar, no serial code) - the src package will contain the code > of the serial project I'm fine with that if nobody object. Yes, that was what I meant. With the

Fwd: Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0

Fowrwarded to the correct ML. The initial mail was wrongly posted to the directory ML.

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 Looks perfect. Thanks for all you hard work on getting the release to this state, Emmanuel. /niklas

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

[ X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 Thanks Emm ! -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

[X ] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 Jeff On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released ! > Here are the complete release notes from JIRA: > > > > Bug > > * [DIRMINA-539 ]

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

Looks fine for me. thanks Emm for being stronger than maven ;) +1 Julien Le Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:18:49 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > > Hi, > > The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released ! > Here are the complete release notes from JIRA: > > > > Bug > > * [DIRMINA-539

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

+1 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:18, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released ! > Here are the complete release notes from JIRA: > > > >   Bug > >   * [DIRMINA-539 ] >     - NioDatagramConnector doesn't

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

I don't have the ability to validate the release so I'll just +0 here. Good job Emmanuel, thanks for struggling with this release and all that it entailed. Regards, 2010/9/19 Guillaume Nodet > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:18, Emmanuel Lecharny > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The last version

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On 19.09.10 15:26, Alex Karasulu wrote: I don't have the ability to validate the release so I'll just +0 here. +0 for the release from me, too. Good job Emmanuel, thanks for struggling with this release and all that it entailed. +1 for fighting all mavens, Emmanuel! Thanks a lot! Bernd

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

I did a quick smoke-test : created a maven quickstart with a simple client + server using the maven repo https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-040 Seems fine. Thanks Emmanuel ! +1 One question though : the distribution on [1] contains sources but no binaries ? Maarte

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

Good job Emmanuel, thanks for struggling with this release and all that it entailed. +1 for fighting all mavens, Emmanuel! Thanks a lot! Without Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (my fellow Directory developer), the release wouldn't be on the table... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.i

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

Rat complains: Too many unapproved licenses: 613 Should we be concerned? Regards, Alan On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released ! > Here are the complete release notes from JIRA: > > > > Bug > > * [DIRMINA-

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On 9/20/10 8:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Rat complains: Too many unapproved licenses: 613 Should we be concerned? Rat must be drunk like a rat. We only have 561 java files, plus a few .xml files. Do you have a log ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 9/20/10 8:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> Rat complains: >> >> Too many unapproved licenses: 613 >> >> Should we be concerned? > Rat must be drunk like a rat. We only have 561 java files, plus a few .xml > files. > > Do you have a l

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: All I did was mvn rat:check -fn To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from target/site/rat-report.html, which I did. Summary --- Notes: 0 Binaries: 4 Archives:

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >  On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> All I did was >> >> mvn rat:check -fn > > To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from > target/site/rat

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> All I did was >> >> mvn rat:check -fn > > To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from > target/site/rat-rep

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On 9/21/10 5:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: All I did was mvn rat:check -fn To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the repor

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > I can fix them, build a release, and launch the vote again, but with a > shortest delay, maybe, assuming that this will be the only modifications... +1 /niklas

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 2

On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 9/21/10 5:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >>> On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: All I did was

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 Jeff On Sep 21, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last > released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released MINA > again (after having checked that we don't have any missing ASL.2

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 (yay!) Regards, Alan On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > After Alan found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last > released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released MINA > again (after having checked that we don't have any

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:55, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last > released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released > MINA again (after having checked that we don't have any missing ASL.20 > heade

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 :) (with fingers crossed) Big Thanks to Emmanuel :) On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Hi, > > After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last > released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released > MINA again (after havin

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Let's vote again : > [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 > -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: h

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 /niklas

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 Le Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:55:44 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny a écrit : > > Hi, > > After Alain found that there were some missing ASL headers in the > last released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just > released MINA again (after having checked that we don't have any > missing A

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 my vote, btw. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 Maarten On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 >>> >> > my vote, btw. > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >

Re: [VOTE] MINA 2.0.0 take 3 !

+1 On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Maarten Bosteels wrote: > +1 > > Maarten > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> >>  [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 >>> >> my vote, btw. >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Cordialement, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com >> >> >