Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and vote?
Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this project?
Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
Dom
On Tue, Aug 29, 201
Dominic,
One question, from looking a second time. Was MXNet always Apache Licensed
(prior to coming to the ASF)?
John
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
> Henri, Suneel,
Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. Will
review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code has
been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. A
Hi Henri,
If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to the
project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of IP
Clearance.
It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
Are there any contributors to the project before
Well, specific to what I'm seeing in MXNet's release, where I'm concerned
is that almost all of the files have the "Licensed to the ASF" header. If
there was an existing copyright on there before, that should remain,
regardless of whether the license is apache v2 or not, unless every single
contri
I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
th
Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
- The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
NOTICE file.
- The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
contributors
Thanks John. I will create the JIRA tickets to track your inputs as requested.
Meghna
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
>
> - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requi
Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament wrote:
> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
>
> - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote:
> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>
>
Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we can't
remove the copyright claim that already exists. Us receiving an ICLA is
what allows us to say "Licensed to the ASF" (it's i
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
>>
>>
> Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on file) we
> can't remove the copyright claim that already exists. Us receivi
+ dev@
This is great feedback. Thanks to the PMC for reviewing. Megna is on point
to track all this feedback, capture action items on the wiki and Jira..
Overall it looks like we have 3 binding +1's.
Are we good to proceed with making the release official?
Best,
Dom
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:3
It looks like the request to vote on the release by the Incubator PMC was made
on Friday August 25.
This vote has been open more than 72 hours after the [VOTE] thread was opened.
So it looks like you are good to release.
Regards,
Craig
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Dominic Divakaruni
> w
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> >> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
> >>
> >>
> > Yes, for any file that we don't have full agreement (ICLA on fil
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:15 PM Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:27 PM Henri Yandell
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"?
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
