Thanks, Maxim.
Another thing: I think the OM 2.1RC1 very very slow for charge login page.
In same server type and hosting, up time is 60s. Moodle pluin dont charge
it. Other OM 2.0r... is 40 s max.
Thanks,
Jaime Balbino
2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik
> @Jaime I was able to partially reproduce an
@Jaime I was able to partially reproduce and fix the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-561
please check rev. 1455803 I'm going to pack RC2 tonight if there will be no
more claims.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Jaime Balbino wrote:
> 2013/3/12 Maxim Solodovnik
>
> > @
2013/3/12 Maxim Solodovnik
> @Eldad, @Jaime I'm unable to reproduce "video on Whiteboard" issue using
> latest OM, please provide detailed steps to reproduce and ensure you are
> using latest OM (2.1RC1/trunk)
>
@Maxim, follow the steps for the error in the video witheboard:
This problem appear
; > >> > > in
> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > database
> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (which both has minor effects when not done
> >> > > however
> >> &g
> > > > > > essential
>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to know for anybody doing tests with it).
>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
; > > > not
> > > > > > > >> > > synced
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > between
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > cluster nodes, so that
effects
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > but nowhere documented).
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Server user/pass is nowhere in use but still
> > >> > > > > > > > Server user/pass is nowhere in use but still to be
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > database.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
t; > > for anybody connecting to openmeetings (also this
>> has
>> > > only
>> > > > >> > minor
>> > > > >> > > > > > effects
>> > > > >> > > > > > > > but nowhere documen
e is only a single 3th party
> > verification
> > > of
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > > > cluster.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > The feature is of beta quality.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
; > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > 2013/3/8 Maxim Solodovnik
>
> > > > > > > > Apache OpenMeetings 2.2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My reasoning is that people I show OpenMeetings to are
> > impressed
> > > > with
> > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > ca
> > > > > with
> > >> > > > > > > > > "release" bug list)
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > @George can you create issues in JIRA?
> > >> > >
gt; > > > > > > > > I was sure all blocking issues are resolved. (There was
>> >> mail
>> >> > > > thread
>> >> > > > > > > with
>> >> > > > > > > > &
t;> > > > I'll
> >> > > > > > > update
> >> > > > > > > > > it with all my steps, so it will be up-to-date
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > &g
up-to-date
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, George Kirkham <
>> > > > > > gkirk...@co2crc.com.au
>> > > > >
t; > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I personally believe we should delay the release of RC1
> > while
> > > > we
> > > > > > > attend
> >
> > > During this time that Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1 is
> going
> > > > > through
> > > > > > > > > testing and bug fixes, development [of new features] could
> > > > continue
> > > > > > > with
> > > &g
t; > through
> > > > > > > > testing and bug fixes, development [of new features] could
> > > continue
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > Apache OpenMeetings 2.2.
> > > > > > >
gt; its
> > > > > > > capabilities but are really turned off by the obvious issues
> with
> > > the
> > > > > > > system, for example text that flows over or under other test or
> > > > fields
> > > > > in
>
log boxes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now that we are with Apache, I would really appreciate it if
> > > > OpenMeetings
> > > > > > did not have these little but annoying issues/bugs and that we
> put
> > > > > forward
> >
gt; > > > Now that we are with Apache, I would really appreciate it if
> > > OpenMeetings
> > > > > did not have these little but annoying issues/bugs and that we put
> > > > forward
> > > > > a much more professional and polished product. An easy to use,
>
e professional and polished product. An easy to use,
> > > > consistent,
> > > > > and stable application. New features can be added along the way
> with
> > > > > version 2.2, but we really should get to a position where what we
rsion 2.2, but we really should get to a position where what we
> have
> > > for
> > > > 2.1.0 RC1 is well designed and maintained.
> > > >
> > > > When people complain about the look and feel (and they are correct to
> > > > complain), it
t loudly,
> but
> > > it is obvious that they do not appreciate these minor issues that
> detract
> > > from an otherwise great application, I would request that we attend to
> > > these issues before we release OpenMeetings version 2.1.
> > >
> > >
; these issues before we release OpenMeetings version 2.1.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > George Kirkham
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> > S
2.1.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> George Kirkham
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2013 5:10 AM
> To: priv...@openmeetings.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 Re
ixing this
release now and not commit something else).
Sebastian
-- Forwarded message --
From: George Kirkham
Date: 2013/3/8
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 Release Candidate 1
To: priv...@openmeetings.apache.org
-1
Hi All,
I personally believe we should dela
* **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2013 5:10 AM
> To: priv...@openmeetings.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 Release Candidate 1
>
+1
2013/3/6 Maxim Solodovnik :
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1
>
> Main changes are covered in the
> Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
>
> Full
> Changelog:http://svn.apache.org/repo
+1
07.03.2013 1:09, Maxim Solodovnik пишет:
Dear OpenMeetings Community,
I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1
Main changes are covered in the
Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
Full
Changelog:http://svn.apache.org/repo
+1
2013/3/6 Maxim Solodovnik
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1
>
> Main changes are covered in the
> Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
>
> Full Changelog:
> http://svn.apache.org/rep
+1
On Mar 7, 2013 2:40 PM, "Sascha Xander"
wrote:
> +1
> Am 06.03.2013 19:09 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" :
>
> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0
> RC1
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the
> > Readme:http://svn.apache.or
+1
Am 06.03.2013 19:09 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" :
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1
>
> Main changes are covered in the
> Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
>
> Full Changelog:
> http:
I haven't seen any of such reports so far
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Well there is a stream of reports on flash segmentation faults. Does anyone
> have a reproducible scenario?
> 07.03.2013 5:30 пользователь "Maxim Solodovnik"
> написал:
>
> > sorry, I'm not very g
Well there is a stream of reports on flash segmentation faults. Does anyone
have a reproducible scenario?
07.03.2013 5:30 пользователь "Maxim Solodovnik"
написал:
> sorry, I'm not very good in advertising (Will ask Irina to review Release
> NOTES next time)
>
> According to AEC: "fallback" code w
+1
Vasiliy
On 07.03.2013 1:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Dear OpenMeetings Community,
I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1
Main changes are covered in the
Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
Full
Changelog:http://svn.apa
+1
2013/3/6 Maxim Solodovnik
> sorry, I'm not very good in advertising (Will ask Irina to review Release
> NOTES next time)
>
> According to AEC: "fallback" code was added just in case (+ I had in mind
> the ability to add something like: if (echoPath == 0) _micro = new
> Microphone(); //just i
sorry, I'm not very good in advertising (Will ask Irina to review Release
NOTES next time)
According to AEC: "fallback" code was added just in case (+ I had in mind
the ability to add something like: if (echoPath == 0) _micro = new
Microphone(); //just in case user want to switch off AEC); I never
+1
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:58 PM, "Ирина Архипец" wrote:
> +1
>
> Irina
>
> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0
> RC1
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the
> > Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2
+1
Irina
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 RC1
>
> Main changes are covered in the
> Readme:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
>
> Full
> Changelog:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tag
One slight correction:
The release notes sound like as if there is any action required to actually
enable the Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC) feature.
However that is not the case. The AEC is enabled by default.
All you can configure is actually the "echoPath" variable.
Also I would like to know
sure
it is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC1/README
Release Notes 2.1
=
_Admin/Calendar HTML5 UI_
Additional HTML5 Wicket based UI is added (fully customizable with CSS)
_Integration with Asterisk_
Integration with Asterisk was refactored. Confbridge is no
Maxim,
Are there any release notes?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apach
44 matches
Mail list logo
