https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Bug ID: 66827
Summary: Exception on loading Excel xslx-file with cell comment
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #5 from Nick Burch ---
https://poi.apache.org/help/faq.html has some code you can use to track down
additional POI jars files you may have forgotten about
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #4 from Srinivas ---
I have checked multiple times my classpath and I do not see any duplicates, is
there any other thing I can check on this?
Thanks for you quick responses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
POI 3.17 is 6 years old. It is no longer supported.
This sort of problem with NoSuchFieldError is most commonly caused by users
having multiple conflicting copies of the same jar(s) on their classpaths
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #2 from Srinivas ---
Yes, poi-ooxml-3.17.jar was added to my classpath
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
Bug ID: 66791
Summary: getting java.lang.NoSuchFieldError:
RAW_XML_FILE_HEADER
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
--- Comment #5 from Prabhakaran ---
Any luck/update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Bug ID: 66705
Summary: Slide Transitions not working XSLF Slide
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
Bug ID: 66687
Summary: Combination of XSSF and SXSSF may result in invalid
files
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
added r1910949
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
Prabhakaran changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
Prabhakaran changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
Priority|P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #3 from Dominik
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
Bug ID: 66682
Summary: Boolean formula not handled in binary eventmodel
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
opeongo changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |Windows 10
--- Comment #2 from opeongo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679
Bug ID: 66679
Summary: Cells without explicit style use column style as
default
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
--- Comment #3 from Prabhakaran ---
Hi please find the attached file,we have developing new POC using apache POI so
there is no Test case, this is actual code.
Note:the file directly get it from POWER BI api, if we have download the file
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
--- Comment #2 from Prabhakaran ---
Created attachment 38596
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38596=edit
Input file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
added r1910760
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66675
Bug ID: 66675
Summary: Save not happening in work book showing A part with
the name '/docProps/core.xml' already exists
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
Prabhakaran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prabhu...@gmail.com
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #14 from moimoi.chk ---
sorry miss
public Iterator cellIterator() {
Iterator originalIterator = (Iterator)(Iterator)_cells.values().iterator();
return new Iterator() {
Cell lastNext = null
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #13 from moimoi.chk ---
package org.apache.poi.xssf.usermodel;
XSSFRow
=
change
=
public Iterator cellIterator() {
Iterator originalIterator = (Iterator)(Iterator)_cells.values().iterator();
return new
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #12 from moimoi.chk ---
package org.apache.poi.xssf.usermodel;
XSSFRow
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #11 from moimoi.chk ---
When you do a remove operation with an iterator, it is not enough to simply
remove it from the list.
It must be done as in the following code.
The following modification is not a clean fix, but it works
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #10 from moimoi.chk ---
↑The comment up is a mistake.
The correct answer is that this problem occurs when "the iterator deletes even
one cell".
=
OK case
Remove empty row
=
fun clea
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #9 from moimoi.chk ---
Hey Tom!
This problem seems to occur when there is an empty line in the iterator.
=
Examples of okay case1
remove empty row
=
fun clearAll(sheet: Sheet) {
val itr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #8 from moimoi.chk ---
This link is an excel file, but it might open in Google Spreadsheet on its own.
It would be better to save the file directly as an excel file if possible, but
if not, I think it is possible to reproduce
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #7 from moimoi.chk ---
Hey Tom!
Several years have passed and I had no choice but to return to help with this
problem^^/!
ExcelFile:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15yg4CwC_MBHOmjArTOJFumzCe6bz0Aic/edit?usp=sharing
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
We can live without that DSTAMP in the Version.java template.
With xmlbeans, I created a new buildinfo file that gets published separately to
Maven. See last June 17-19 commits in
https://github.com/apache
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Stadler ---
FYI, a simple re-build did not show any difference when using diffoscope:
for i in `find build -name *.jar`;do echo $i `basename $i`;diffoscope
--progress --text - $i /tmp/`basename $i`;done
build
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1910569 that proves creating 2 rows with same row num does not cause
an exception.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
r.naujack - could you provide a fuller example? 2 lines with no idea what
classesyou used is not a reproducible test case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
r.naujack+...@quotas.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
--- Comment #4 from r.naujack+...@quotas.de ---
I had this problem in a sheet with a duplicate created row:
final Row h1Row = sheet.createRow(2);
final Row h2Row = sheet.createRow(2);
It works with versions <= 4
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62429
Bug 62429 depends on bug 66650, which changed state.
Bug 66650 Summary: add chartEx schema to poi-ooxml-full
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66650
What|Removed |Added
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66650
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
added r1910561
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #3 from Shubham patil ---
Appreciated,
Thanks for the quick response.
I have added Djava.awt.headless=true line and rerun my application but facing
other issue.
..
Now I am getting java.lang.UnsatisfiedLink Error
usr/pkg/java
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #1 from sfis...@gmail.com ---
you might need to pass -Djava.awt.headless=true to the jvm launched inside the
docker image
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Bug ID: 3
Summary: org.springframework.web.util.NestedServletException
handler dispatch failed Could not initialize class
sun.awt.X11FontManager
Product: POI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #12 from Tim Allison ---
Ugh, ugh, ugh. Ross Johnson. Please forgive me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #11 from Tim Allison ---
I opened: https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/477
The one challenge is that we do rely on case sensitivity for "Book" vs "BOOK".
We use the former as an indicator of the old excel fo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks ManiacTwister. We do need to make POI changes. PR 269 has got some
problems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #1 from ManiacTwister ---
Thanks for your effort.
I can confirm using the workaround `setCellFormulaValidation(false)` fixes the
problem for my testcase as well as for my real use case.
Let me know if i can help/test anything
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Bug ID: 1
Summary: Issue with table formulas being modified by POI
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #10 from Tim Allison ---
Ross Spencer recently raised an issue on Tika on this topic:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4091
I might take a look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
poi--oxml defaults to having a dependency on poi-ooxml-lite.
poi-ooxml-lite is a subset of poi-ooxml-full.
poi-ooxml-lite only has the most commonly used XMLBeans for POI.
poi-ooxml-full is big so that's why
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
jrme...@comcast.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
jrme...@comcast.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from jrme
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66653
Bug ID: 66653
Summary: XDDFValueAxis setMajorUnit gets an exception on
execution
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66650
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
added r1910433
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66650
Bug ID: 66650
Summary: add chartEx schema to poi-ooxml-full
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66651
Bug ID: 66651
Summary: References to non existing named cells inside Formulas
throws exception even with IF/ISERROR
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62429
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||66650
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66650
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||62429
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1910364
That is just the tip of the iceberg because we will now need to go through all
the jars and see what happens after clean builds - if the jars are the same or
if they are different and what
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
In Gradle, we have
https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/working_with_files.html#sec:reproducible_archives
Enabling the configs seems relatively easy. Then, we will need to see if the
output jars
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
Bug ID: 66644
Summary: Make Apache POI binaries reproducible
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66629
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66611
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66632
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66632
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect dafault char |Incorrect default char
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66632
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect char width|Incorrect dafault char
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66632
Bug ID: 66632
Summary: Incorrect char width
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66629
Bug ID: 66629
Summary: Formula evaluator returns wrong result form sumif
formula
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628
Bug ID: 66628
Summary: Read excel file with restricted access: no such entry:
"EncryptionInfo", had: [EncryptedPackage,
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.2-FINAL
Ha
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66625
Rodrigo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rcc.d...@gmail.com
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66625
Bug ID: 66625
Summary: Unable to sign a docx file multiple times
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
You could try poi-shared-strings - it has supports keeping the shared strings
in a temp file to avoid the memory overhead.
https://github.com/pjfanning/poi-shared-strings. SXSSF sample in
https://github.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #1 from Tonny ---
Comment on attachment 38567
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38567
Export of many RichTextStrings with font styles To Excel
>package com.foo.export;
>
>import java.io.File
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
Bug ID: 66620
Summary: Heap dump when using SXSSF for large XLSX files
containing RichTextStrings
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Bourg ---
The fix is incomplete, according to the CFB specification the number of
directory sectors must be set to zero for files using the format version 3
(with 512 byte sectors). I'll update the patch.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66614
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66614
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1910049 and will see if this builds ok - I ran some of the tests but
will let the CI build do the full check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66614
Bug ID: 66614
Summary: The OFFSET function cannot handle cells after the
257th column
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029
Rakhi Barayanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029
--- Comment #23 from Rakhi Barayanan ---
Hi team,
Could see STANDALONE="NO" IN XML BEHIND THE EXCEL OUTPUT FROM latest poi,this
also causing corruption issues in the 3rd
party applications when accessing the file.
Is there a way
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66607
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612
--- Comment #4 from 1u...@protonmail.com ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #3)
> I tested your xlsm file and this code seems to get the macrosheet part
>
> String relType =
> "http://schemas.microsof
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
I tested your xlsm file and this code seems to get the macrosheet part
String relType =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/relationships/xlMacro
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
1umos - is this you?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76306947/how-to-get-xlm-macro-sheet-from-excel-with-apache-poi-xssfworkbook
Seems similar but seems to suggest that you can get relationships
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Have you tried
getRelationshipsByType("http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/relationships/xlMacrosheet;)
- from a quick check of the POI code, getRelationshipsByType expects strings
601 - 700 of 21913 matches
Mail list logo
