RE: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Steve Huston
> On 01/06/2010 11:20 AM, john dunning wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote: > >> On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: > > > >>> Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets > >>> for optional modules into separate files for the sake of > clari

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/06/2010 11:20 AM, john dunning wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and readability. Yes

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread john dunning
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: > > Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for > > optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and > > readability. > > Yes, thats a fair point. Thanks al

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote: On 01/06/2010 06:14 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote: I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py a

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/06/2010 06:14 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote: I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-06 Thread Gordon Sim
On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote: I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is opti

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Alan Conway
On 01/04/2010 02:43 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote: 2010/1/4 john dunning I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is th

RE: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
hange types already in use. Robbie > -Original Message- > From: Robert Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com] > Sent: 04 January 2010 19:43 > To: dev@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: Test suite vs optional xml config > > 2010/1/4 john dunning > > > I&#x

Re: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Robert Godfrey
2010/1/4 john dunning > I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml > exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite > (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. > > The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is optional. If > y

RE: Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Huston
Hi John, > I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure > xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to > the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. > > The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is > optional. If you didn't

Test suite vs optional xml config

2010-01-04 Thread john dunning
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite (cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match. The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is optional. If you didn't configure for xml and loa