Re: [sc-dev] Preparation of localizable separators in CWSkoheiformula01

2008-04-01 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Daniel, On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 10:48 +0200, Daniel Rentz wrote: > Hello Kohei, Eike, all, > > > for public interest, I post my knowledge about formula separators in MS > Excel into the mailing list... > > After some testing with different Excel versions with different UI > languages (3.0 Ge

Re: [sc-dev] Preparation of localizable separators in CWSkoheiformula01

2008-03-19 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kohei, On Wednesday, 2008-03-19 01:03:02 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Just finished. Now I don't use ScAddress::Convention all over the place > but simply put the localized separators in the mxSymbolsNative and > mxSymbolsEnglish. I'm not sure if we really want that in mxSymbolsEnglish. Tho

Re: [sc-dev] Preparation of localizable separators in CWSkoheiformula01

2008-03-19 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kohei, On Tuesday, 2008-03-18 18:19:01 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I said what I said because the code looked like once the symbol maps are > initialized at start-up they don't get modified during run-time. Up to now they weren't, it wasn't necessary. > But I > guess I could change it to m

Re: [sc-dev] Preparation of localizable separators in CWSkoheiformula01

2008-03-18 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 22:28 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > On Monday, 2008-03-17 21:23:11 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > > > [... separators at ScAddress::Convention ...] > > Well, that code was implemented before ScGrammar arrived in DEV300_m2. > > So, I couldn't have used ScGrammar

Re: [sc-dev] Preparation of localizable separators in CWSkoheiformula01

2008-03-18 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 22:37 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > On Tuesday, 2008-03-18 14:13:43 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > > I'd like to make sure one thing before I go with this. It seems to me > > that, if we tie the separators to ScCompiler::mxSymbolsNative, then it > > will not b