http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-12 23:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=2513)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2513&action=view)
simplified server that demonstrates the problem (see fol
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-11 11:36 ---
> Has there been any progress on this issue?
I had to put working on this on hold until after my final exam. I might be able
to get back to it this weekend. I wro
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-11 09:08 ---
Has there been any progress on this issue?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 12:56 ---
XP firewall is not enabled. Symantec Client Security is installed, but I have
tested with it disabled and it should not affect anything on localhost anyway.
Well,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:41 ---
Is XP SP2 Firewall enabled?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:30 ---
I did recently install XP Service pack 2 and it has been interacting badly with
lots of things... How about if I format my disk, install linux and see how
everythi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 09:53 ---
hm
have you guys got virus scanners installed? might they do something to "bad"
content being sent over 127.0.0.1?
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 04:28 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting "failed sanity check" on some messages
> But here's kicker. I tested using the first 39166 bytes of the message of
the
> first te
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 04:16 ---
sleep(5) between the call to shutdown and the close doesn't help at all.
I added a -l option to the call to spamc -x to see the error. Tthe results are
interestin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 00:58 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting "failed sanity check" on some messages
I was more thinking of making sure that SO_LINGER is set correctly. This
really sounds li
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 18:57 ---
Loren, thanks, it looked promising, but adding a call to shutdown before the
close did not help :-(
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 17:44 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting "failed sanity check" on some
messages
>From the MS socket documentation:
The semantics of closesocket are affected by the sock
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 15:13 ---
> Just as long as the packets are not fragmented,
> might be enough to keep the problem from occuring
I'll have to try that. If nothing else, the implied flush th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 14:09 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting "failed sanity check" on some messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Does sleep() allow fractional seconds i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Does sleep() allow fractional seconds in its argument? If not, is there
> a way to sleep for less than a second?
using "select(undef, undef, undef, $nsecs);" is portable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 13:26 ---
Also could you give a little more detail on where to place the new code.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 12:30 ---
I just wanted to let everyone know that I have see the error with files as
small as 8K. What you may want try is to break the message response string
into packe
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 12:14 ---
It's probably ok to slow down scanning on Cygwin only.
I'll see about putting together a standalone test for a Cygwin bug report. That
will do two other things th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 11:36 ---
Do you think this workaround will make it into the official Spam-Assassin
Build. And If so how would I know when it is there, other that looking at the
code mys
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 11:31 ---
wow, that's a serious bug! again, a standalone test case would rock so that it
can be escalated upstream to cygwin.
in the meantime, I think the substr hack wor
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 10:39 ---
I have a workaround that tests ok, but I am not submitting a patch because I
don't think it is a workable solution. Instead I'm putting it in this comment in
the h
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-31 15:23 ---
I found the firewall that was holding up my testing -- remnant of a VPN client I
had been using -- and captured the traffic from a test with spamc on a linux box
a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 10:19 ---
Sorry for not checking in for a while. I was away at a technical conference.
I am happy to see that the problem can be replicated. So does anyone have any
ide
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-24 22:23 ---
hmm. possibility: a helper app is closing the fd?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the as
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-24 16:48 ---
I have some firewall problem trying tests between machines, but I did verify
that going through a ssh tunnel between my Cygwin box and my Fedora core 2 box,
runnin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-24 14:41 ---
I get the same results if I use -L and disable auto_whitelist and Bayes in
user_prefs. I'm having difficulty getting a network capture, so I still don't
know what
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-24 01:12 ---
More results:
I got the same sporadic return code 76 using svn trunk under Cygwin (perl
5.8.5), and also when I added a sleep n delay of 5, 10, and 20 seconds bet
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-23 23:48 ---
I've reproduced this doing the following. Maybe someone can see if it happens
outside of Cygwin.
I did this with a build of the 3.0.1 branch. I haven't yet tried
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-23 09:57 ---
SpamD command line:
perl.exe spamd -D -s /var/log/spamd.log -r /var/log/spamd.pid
SpamC:
spamc -x < infile > outfile
--- You are receiving this mail bec
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-23 02:17 ---
> If it is a protocol failure what could be causing it
I don't know. I tried forcing a timeout by setting a snall value for the spamc
-t option, but that returned
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 21:05 ---
I have the LANG var set to en_US. The messages the are failing are a variety
of language types including "us-ascii". If it is a protocol failure what could
be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 17:17 ---
> what about character sets?
I don't think it is a matter of the character counts not matching. A protocol
error and losing the connection explains better the big
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 15:34 ---
hmm. what about character sets? is everyone using the US codepage?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 14:12 ---
It looks like spamd thinks everything is ok, but spamc is getting in error in
the socket connection. 76 is, as you said, "remote error in protocol" which I
see is
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 11:55 ---
Well I reinstalled Cygwin and SA using the latest CVS build, still having the
same problem.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the as
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 10:07 ---
Just tried the latest CVS build I got the following results:
D:\ESA>zspamc-alt2 -x < zs2.out > zs2a.out
failed sanity check, 109044 bytes claimed, 33721 bytes see
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 05:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=2476)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2476&action=view)
my spamc.exe
Here is the spamc from my cygwin build, in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 05:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=2475)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2475&action=view)
same zs2.out sample with resultant zs2a.out and Debug fr
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 21:24 ---
My initial test usaing zs2.out did not reproduce the problem, using 3.01 svn
branch and running spamc and spamd under Cygwin.
I'll have to check it more thoroughl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 21:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=2473)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2473&action=view)
One more sample
The sample that I just attached I tried
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 20:42 ---
As a test I tried converting a test message, using a DOS2UNIX utility, before
sending it to SpamD. I got the same results. SpamD is only return a portion
of th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 20:33 ---
I submitted a copy of the samples as a zipped file. Most messages are being
properly processed only a small percentage are having this problem. I have
noticed
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 20:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=2472)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2472&action=view)
Zipped copy of attachment samples
--- You are re
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:55 ---
Can you check if it has anything to do with the mail message having DOS vs unix
newlines? That would be hidden in the attachments you posted unless you zipped
them
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:03 ---
I have attached four messages that recieved this error.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=2471)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2471&action=view)
Sample #4
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=2470)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2470&action=view)
Sample #3
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=2469)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2469&action=view)
Sample#2
--- You are receiving this mail because
48 matches
Mail list logo
