btw,
To some extend it will be possible to create a XUL port in HTML via some CSS
trickery. I also hope that XBL/XBL2 picks up to simplify this process even
further. However, we are talking about some serious commitment here because it
is a lot of work.
On Monday, November 12, 2012 7:22:13 PM
On Nov 8, 3:46 pm, richardson.balca...@gmail.com wrote:
> I was just reading the effort of installing "open web apps" locally, I'm
> assuming the strategy shift that I'm talking about is that Mozilla is betting
> on Firefox as their application framework, that would make sense not to
> support X
richardson.balca...@gmail.com schrieb:
I believe my question is, if Mozilla is taking out their app development platform not
'XUL' per se. How would they promote "openness, innovation and opportunity on the
web", only by giving us the opportunity of doing so in extensions on a browser?
What's
On 11/08/12 12:46, richardson.balca...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just reading the effort of installing "open web apps" locally, I'm
assuming the strategy shift that I'm talking about is that Mozilla is betting on Firefox
as their application framework, that would make sense not to support Xulrunn
I was just reading the effort of installing "open web apps" locally, I'm
assuming the strategy shift that I'm talking about is that Mozilla is betting
on Firefox as their application framework, that would make sense not to support
Xulrunner anymore.
I would like to see how could one use the n
On 11/8/2012 2:06 PM, richardson.balca...@gmail.com wrote:
> I believe my question is, if Mozilla is taking out their app development
> platform not 'XUL' per se. How would they promote "openness, innovation and
> opportunity on the web", only by giving us the opportunity of doing so in
> extens
I believe my question is, if Mozilla is taking out their app development
platform not 'XUL' per se. How would they promote "openness, innovation and
opportunity on the web", only by giving us the opportunity of doing so in
extensions on a browser?
What's the strategy? Is not clear where is this
El miércoles, 7 de noviembre de 2012 15:28:58 UTC-4, Dave Townsend escribió:
>
> > At first I tried for a couple of days to try to get xulrunner 16.0.2 to
> > work on my OSX 10.6, until I understoo it wasn't working at all running the
> > 'xulrunner -v' will return an 'error' string where the
On 11/06/12 13:58, richardson.balca...@gmail.com wrote:
At first I tried for a couple of days to try to get xulrunner 16.0.2 to work on
my OSX 10.6, until I understoo it wasn't working at all running the 'xulrunner
-v' will return an 'error' string where the version should come out.
Looking in
Hi Richard,
I would love to get more support for xulrunner given that I have already spent
3 year on xulrunner-based application but I am getting none. My advice is to
stay away from it. It is clear that Mozilla is not taking this product
anywhere. If you like to do stuff in Markup and Javascri
At first I tried for a couple of days to try to get xulrunner 16.0.2 to work on
my OSX 10.6, until I understoo it wasn't working at all running the 'xulrunner
-v' will return an 'error' string where the version should come out.
Looking in forums such as this I found out it is a well known error,
11 matches
Mail list logo
