Thomas Göttgens wrote:
Hello,
KM> This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point?
KM> (new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter
KM> if there has not been many updates, we could simply say like
KM> '1.3.3 is almost like 1.3.2, no need to upgrade unless...)
[...]
KM
Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:25, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot
more functional.
This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point?
(new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter
if there
Hello,
KM> This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point?
KM> (new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter
KM> if there has not been many updates, we could simply say like
KM> '1.3.3 is almost like 1.3.2, no need to upgrade unless...)
[...]
KM> New releases would
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:08 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> I think it's a good idea to release current cvs as 1.4.0...
Full ack, we need a new release along with a website facelift.
Enjoy!
--
Enver ALTIN |http://skyblue.gen.tr/
Software developer @ Parkyeri | htt
Hi Kalle,
I think it's a good idea to release current cvs as 1.4.0...
Kalle Marjola wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:25, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
>
>> I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot
>> more functional.
>>
> This reminds: could we get new stable release
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:25, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
> I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot
> more functional.
>
This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point?
(new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter
if there has not been m
