Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 13.04.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Rafal Luzynski: 12.04.2017 18:20 Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: [...] if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses else it *tries* to load - and uses the first available - GUI-backend in the following order: libyui-qt libyui-gtk libyui-ncurses Could it at least try to

Re: Conflicting gstreamer1-plugins packages in rawhide?

2017-04-12 Thread Vascom
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.11.90-1.fc27 now builded in rawhide. Try again. ср, 12 апр. 2017 г. в 17:49, Guido Aulisi : > I tried to build a new version of jalv package and I got a conflict > between gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.11.2-1.fc26.x86_64 and > gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.11.90-1.fc27.x

Re: YAST for Fedora?

2017-04-12 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
As someone who came to Fedora from openSUSE, yeah, Adam, YaST is definitely a bad approach. It was great for things I did *once* when I set up a box, but for the stuff I did regularly - install / uninstall packages, build stuff from source, etc. - the command line tools beat the crap out of GUIs.

Re: YAST for Fedora?

2017-04-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: > Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many > aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very > interesting, useful and beneficial for all users. > > * Why Fedora does not

Fedora 26-20170412.n.0 compose check report

2017-04-12 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/110 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170411.n.0): ID: 80301 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/80301 ID: 80302 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-ra

YAST for Fedora?

2017-04-12 Thread Farhad Mohammadi Majd
Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very interesting, useful and beneficial for all users. * Why Fedora does not have such tool? * How much money is need to develop such tool from scratc

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Rafal Luzynski
12.04.2017 18:20 Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > [...] > if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses > else it *tries* to load - and uses the first available - > GUI-backend in the following order: > > libyui-qt > libyui-gtk > libyui-ncurses Could it at least try to recognize the current desktop envi

Self introduction: Artur Iwicki

2017-04-12 Thread Artur Iwicki
Good day, everyone. My name is Artur Iwicki. I am a hobbyist game developer (going by the nickname "suve") and I would like to bring some of my works to the official repositories. Currently I have submitted two review requests, one game and one command-line utility. - https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 04/12/2017 01:34 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Libyui is a well tested and since 15 years proven to work toolkit / abstraction-layer written by SUSE, even used in SLES… It's powering their installer and system-configuration tooling. FWIW, dnfdragora currently crashes on startup and it se

Announce: DistGit namespace migration: docker -> container

2017-04-12 Thread Adam Miller
Hello all, The migration of the docker namespace in DistGit, cgit, PackageDB and Container Guidelines is now complete. This migration is at the request of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] to highlight that Fedora is targeting all OCI[1] compliant container runtimes instead of any specific one. For thos

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:35 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: To throw in my 2c as gtk maintainer: I'd rather have a well-written qt app on my desktop than something that relies on fragile toolkit abstraction layers like this. Both gtk and qt are alr

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > To throw in my 2c as gtk maintainer: I'd rather have a well-written > qt > app on my desktop than something that relies on fragile toolkit > abstraction layers like this. Both gtk and qt are already > abstractions. > Adding another one on

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:07 schrieb Matthias Clasen: On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 18:20 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: @Björn: Do you know how libyui chooses the toolkit? Yes. Libyui performs a check on init of ui whether it's running on a TTY or not: if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 18:20 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > > > @Björn: Do you know how libyui chooses the toolkit? > > Yes.  Libyui performs a check on init of ui whether it's running on > a  > TTY or not: > >  if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses >  else it *tries* to lo

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 12.04.2017 um 18:05 schrieb Christian Dersch: On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Christian Dersch
On 04/12/2017 06:05 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Christian Dersch
On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens if both libyui-gtk and libyui-qt are installed, w

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed > at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens if > both libyui-gtk and libyui-qt are installed, which one gets picked? I can answer that, bec

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' > > > > Esser wrote: > > > > > I hope someone can help

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 04/12/2017 10:49 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller >>> wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chi

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:49:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > The idea is to start with something that has a limited impact, I > > believe the idea is to build up the pipeline in such a way that it > > can scale to the entire distribution, but we need to start > > somewhere and Atomic Host is a d

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> I have put together a wiki page ma

Conflicting gstreamer1-plugins packages in rawhide?

2017-04-12 Thread Guido Aulisi
I tried to build a new version of jalv package and I got a conflict between gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.11.2-1.fc26.x86_64 and gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.11.90-1.fc27.x86_64 Local mockbuild for x86_64 had no errors. Partial output of root.log: DEBUG util.py:439:  Error: Transaction check error:

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14:39AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI > > I'd actually like to escalate this

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ch

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 12.04.2017 um 16:28 schrieb Christian Dersch: On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Christian Dersch
On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependenci

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > >>I hope someone can help me with the following question: > >>Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > >> Supplements: (pkg_a and

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI > > I'd actually like to escalate this from a Cha

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI I'd actually like to escalate this from a Change proposal (which generally fit into Fedora releases) to a Cou

co-owner wanted on wordpress and roundcubemail

2017-04-12 Thread Remi Collet
Hi, I try to maintain Wordpress and Roundcubemail, but I will prefer to have some co-owner on these. Especially to allow (security) update when I'm offline, or busy with some important downstream work (PHP). Feel free to contact me, or request ACL on pkgdb. Remi. _

Re: Problem building LizardFS - hidden symbol is referenced by DSO

2017-04-12 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 08:02 +0200, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 11/04/2017 20:34, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto: > > I would like to get the LizardFS distributed filesystem into > > Fedora, > > but I'm running into problems compiling it with Fedora's hardening > > flags enabled. > > I would greatly appre

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:11:33AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has > > started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Dear all, > > A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has > started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration (CI) to > our > current packaging and releasing workflow. > The current id

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Christian Dersch
On 04/12/2017 02:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or p

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > I hope someone can help me with the following question: > Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) > Is there any way to express a depen

[HEADS UP] F27: Desktop-Environments: replacing Yumex-DNF with DNFDragora, added weak-dependencies to libyui-$UI

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello folks! For the transition from Yumex-DNF to DNFDragora, I have added the following weak-deps to the corresponding libyui-$UI packages: For GTK-based DEs (libyui-gtk): # For Cinnamon. Supplements: (libyui%{?_isa} and cinnamon%{?_isa}) # For LXDE. # For Cinnamon. Supplements: (libyui

ppisar pushed to perl-Gearman (f26). "2.004.002 bump"

2017-04-12 Thread notifications
From 96b313e315cb11a1bd4ebe6996594af990f8cd42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:22:54 +0200 Subject: 2.004.002 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Gearman.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 de

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 12.04.2017 um 13:58 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hello folks, I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recen

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> I hope someone can help me with the following question: >>> Does recent Fedora's rpm sup

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hello folks, I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d

Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

2017-04-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Dear all, A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration (CI) to our current packaging and releasing workflow. The current idea is to use fedora-atomic as a prototype product to port into this workfl

Re: RPM boolean dependencies in Requires

2017-04-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2017-04-06 at 14:20 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> > Isn't mash dead? >> Some people tell me it is, some other says no. And after some time, >> someone starts porting it to DNF. So it is hard to say. >> >> Anyhow, it *is* used right no

Re: RPM boolean dependencies in Requires

2017-04-12 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2017-04-06 at 14:20 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Isn't mash dead? > Some people tell me it is, some other says no. And after some time, > someone starts porting it to DNF. So it is hard to say. > > Anyhow, it *is* used right now. Igor,  Do you understand that this sentence  doesn't mak

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello folks, > > I hope someone can help me with the following question: > Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) > > Is there any way to ex

Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

2017-04-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello folks, I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) Is there any way to express a dependency like that? Cheers Björn __

Re: switching libcurl back to OpenSSL and providing the libcurl-minimal subpackage

2017-04-12 Thread Florian Weimer
On 04/10/2017 03:52 PM, Kai Engert wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: Anyway, I guess we should move this discussion to some curl- or nss-related channel... The question remains, if it makes sense to switch back to openssl, if the consequence is a loss in completeness

Re: How to find valid group package names for kickstart?

2017-04-12 Thread Michal Schorm
Locane, if you visited some Fedora wiki page, when you searched for the answer, please add this solution there, so other's won't be stuck with the same problem. -- Michal Schorm Associate Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat Czech On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Samuel Sieb

Orphaning several rubygem-* packages

2017-04-12 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Hi, I just orphaned several packages: rubygem-ttfunk rubygem-xmlhash rubygem-wirb rubygem-unicode-display_width rubygem-single_test rubygem-ruby-rc4 rubygem-robotex rubygem-rkerberos rubygem-paint rubygem-mobileesp_converted rubygem-hoptoad_notifier rubygem-foreman_api ru