Hi Steve,
It looks like you had some (browser?) caching issue, all the rpms in
all the chroots are there.
Best regards,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
Hello Antonio,
I'll take care of it.
Till later,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of
Now they're back up and running again. I think that when I started the
builds before, s390x did not appear in the output of "koji list-tasks
--mine".
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Hello Kevin,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Planned Outage - build systems ( koji, osbs, mbs, src, pdc, kojipkgs, odcs,
> registriy) - 2021-11-09 17:00 UTC
[…]
>
> We will be doing several maint tasks during this outage:
>
> All the s390x builders will be moving from t
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:23 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Hello Antonio,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We are ready to push openbabel3 in R
Thanks a lot Björn, this is very helpful!
All the best,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c
Hello,
I'm wondering if there's an "elegant" and "rpm" way to do the
following, without calling an external tool (and maybe adding another
dependency to a package):
Project "foo" tracks the development of project "bar" and both use
basic semantic versioning, X.Y.Z. Project "bar" rarely increments
Hello Antonio,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide
Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is
done in order to rebuild dependent packages?
Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x?
Thank you for all
Hello Ron,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:55 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> I haven’t found any info about renaming an existing project/package, and was
> wondering what the procedures would be.
We have this:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/
___
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:59 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 9/26/21 10:22, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> > I moved the openbabel's libraries under a private lib directory.
> > 'desktop' files are modified for working in this sense.
>
> Sorry, i meant gchemistry's libraries under a private li
On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> I will try with a Fedora 34 VM later and report back.
I got pretty much the same results on F34.
I think xdrawchem works better with Open Babel 3 than it does with
Open Babel 2, at least as far as structure cleanup goes (I ins
Hello Antonio,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:50 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done.
> Please, can anyone that uses these software test them?
I spun up a Fedora 35 VM and installed everything from your copr,
didn't mess with any system settings. He
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:37 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project.
Well done Antonio!
I will give it a try this weekend.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Hello Antonio,
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:32 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Links of Copr projects to get srpms for testing:
>
> openbabel3-3.1.1:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/
As expected, Molsketch had no problem with 3.1.1, it built fine.
I also played with
Hi Antonio,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:11 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> 'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they
> have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts".
>
> Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora?
I think that the people
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >
>
> We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary.
> Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet?
Almost two years ago (how t
Hello Antonio,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> openbabel-3.1.1 is ready for Rawhide branch. 'libopenbabel' soname is
> updated from 5 to 7, all dependent packages will need a rebuild at least:
What about the packages that haven't been ported to work with Open
Babel
Hi Vitaly,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 10:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> They just closed the sources. Memtest86 is a commercial product now. It
> has full UEFI support, etc.
Just to be sure, you are talking about Memtest86, not Memtest86+, right?
_
Salut Nicolas,
And welcome aboard!
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 3:54 AM Nicolas FORMICHELLA wrote:
> and in process of packaging Canon IJfilter driver for AUR/RPM and DEB
A long time ago I had managed to create an rpm from canon's package
for the iP7200 printer, which conformed to our guidelines at
mek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:38:08AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Should gdb be able to read from a sound device?
>
> It shouldn't attempt to.
Should I file a bug against gdb or abrt?
> > Having root logged in a terminal, I tried to check the state
Hello,
Apologies if you find the subject line vague or misleading, I couldn't
figure out what to write. I've been trying to debug a transient
pipewire issue so that I can file a bug report, but I keep stumbling
from one roadblock to the next.
When the problem occurs, pipewire receives a SIGSEGV a
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Did you by chance add them to the update during the upgrade this
> morning? (starting at 10UTC)? It doesn't look like bodhi did the right
> thing with the tagging here... I can try and correct things.
It was towards the end of the
Hello,
Can anyone help me figure out what's going on with this update?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b8551abae2
It says that the side-tag is not among a bunch of other tags. It does
exist though.
What I did was build a package and its dependencies in side-tags for
F33, F34
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 6:37 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > Dnia Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:51:31PM +0200, Björn Persson napisał(a):
> > > I used yum system-upgrade to upgrade from Fedora 32 to Fedora 34. Now
> > > Grub complains about not finding some theme files, and then displa
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:27 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 3/9/21 1:39 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Well, the first option is still a no-no, as the fixup has to happen in
> > the user's home directory. For the second one, I think I'd need to add
> > someth
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 7:28 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 3/8/21 5:10 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Is there something I can do to sed out the -qt5 suffix, or should I
> > just bite the bullet, build the update and wait for the bug reports to
> > come in?
>
> Yo
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:26 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:03:05AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that packagers should *ever* be in the business of
> > modifying the content of users' $HOME directories.
>
> In fact this has happened before in
Hello Fabio,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:03 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> >
> > Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the
> > kind of update that can't wait for the nex
Hello,
Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the
kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the
other fixes, the new version has dropped support for Qt4 and with it,
the -qt5 suffixes of several files.
While testing it, I realized that after the u
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> On 2/4/21 9:52 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> > considerable lag. In the last 4 or so years I remember issues with
> > tracker, gnome-shell, mutter/clutter and friends on specific GPUs,
> > default or popula
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:53:32AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow
> > to launch applications? Recent article:
> >
> > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/ubuntu-cor
Hello,
Could someone please help me figure out which rule I need to edit over
at Fedora Notifications, to stop receiving messages like this one?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:53 PM wrote:
>
> Notification time stamped 2021-01-14 20:53:32 UTC
>
> bpeck/jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org's vt
Hello Richard,
Right after logging in (and starting Firefox), dmesg returns 1176
lines, of which 25 are audit messages. It's pretty much the same ratio
on a second desktop and slightly higher (46/724) on a server running
multiple services, but I would call neither nearly unreadable. Are you
seeing
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 5:53 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On 12/18/20 3:52 PM, James Szinger wrote:
> >
> > No. One can also download the sources from upstream using spectool or
> > similar, even wget or curl. My local work flow is typically get or
> > create spec file and patches,
Sorry to be a bother, but is there another side effect from having
this update installed on a server? As far as I could tell from the
discussion on the update page, only the sha1 signed firefox add-ons
are concerned, but I could be missing something.
___
Hi Jerry,
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:08 PM Alexander Ploumistos
>
> You're a gmail user like me. Between approximately 90 and 30 minutes
> ago, I had several people call me to ask why I had deleted my email
> account. Email sent to me was bouncing back with a message th
Off topic, is there a way to see the message headers in Hyperkitty?
I'm trying to figure out why 4 messages in this thread were never
delivered to me.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:45 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 17:59 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > On 12/15/20 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 22:38 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 202
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:04 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> > will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have t
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 8:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
> remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
I'm running firefox 83.0-13.fc33.x86_
Hello,
I don't understand how, but I seem to have hit this issue with an F33 build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57394473
The same package builds fine in rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57393926
The new release fixes a nasty bug and I'd like to
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 2:40 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam
wrote:
>
> I don't see any errors when I look at the root log I can't find any errors as
> to why the package fails to build. This is what the spec file looks like with
> my changes.
There's this in your build.log:
Patch #1 (update-wocky-
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:31 AM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> Ah, so you meant the F28 and F29 chroots listed here in the build details,
> e.g.
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alexpl/molsketch/build/869545/
Yes, that's what I was talking about.
> That is as expected. Possibly we can im
Hello again,
Perhaps I'm the one who's misunderstood. Is the fact that F28 and F29
builds are still around unrelated to which chroots are actually there?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:54 AM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> Hello Alexander,
> what do those chroots say in their "Remaining time" column, please?
They are not listed at all, see these two:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alexpl/molsketch/repositories/
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs
Hello Jakub,
I noticed that some of my projects still have chroots for even older
releases, e.g. F28, F29 without the option to remove them. In another
instance, only a specific F30 arch shows up among the chroots to be
removed or extended, while the others architectures are not picked up.
Is ther
Hi Zbigniew,
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:53:03AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> […]
> I think it makes sense to add a new 'openbabel3' package. Like Kevin wrote
> in the other mail, it seems likel
Hello everyone,
I've finally managed to find some time and get the latest Open Babel
snapshot to build in F32 and rawhide. The spec file is ugly with a
bunch of comments still in it and I've realized that documentation
upstream is lacking, especially concerning build options and bindings.
So far,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:20 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:21 PM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Neal,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > CMake macros are documented in the packagi
Hi Neal,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> CMake macros are documented in the packaging guidelines:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CMake/
So if a spec file is supposed to work on F31 to F33, "%undefine
__cmake_in_source_build" is all that's require
Hello Dominik and everyone else,
The next release of Molsketch is going to build against Open Babel
3.x, so I started working on updating the openbabel package around the
time version 3.1.1 came out, which supposedly fixed some issues
related to packaging on linux. Based on your spec file, I was t
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:30 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> On 6/26/20 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:13:39AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >> Not Fedora land, but Facebook installs it on all of our root
> >> devices, so millions of machines. We've done this for 5 years.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:49 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 2, 2020 3:47:00 PM MST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:22 AM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > That's a link to the release an
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:22 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> That's a link to the release announcement. If you follow the thread, you'll
> find that I was provided a link to two bugzilla links are to meta links to
> blockers, where the items that are blocking are not issues preventing x86
> system
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:54 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:24:49 AM MST Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 7/2/20 3:16 AM, nick...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Note that, even though Microsoft is pushing for UEFI on new systems in
> > > the OEM version of Windows, they still
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:30 AM José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> IIRC this is probably related with the dependencies of anaconda:
Is there an easy suggestion we can make to our users other than play
with "rpm -e" or nuking dnf's database? There's a bunch of threads
over at askfedora where people are
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:35 AM José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Monday, 29 June 2020 22.23.00 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > This tends to take with it many things that it shouldn't, like gdb,
> > dbus-x11, python3-pwquality, tigervnc-server-minimal and tmux -
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:09 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> I fix this on my
> own systems with "dnf remove dmraid"
This tends to take with it many things that it shouldn't, like gdb,
dbus-x11, python3-pwquality, tigervnc-server-minimal and tmux - among
others.
_
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:40 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> disclaimer: I'm using zsh, not bash but it has the same issue. But IMO you
> can't really blame it - how is the completion to know that you want to
> install an RPM in the current directory? The correct way would be
> dnf install ./
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Let's make Fedora more approachable, by having a default editor that
> doesn't require specialist knowledge to use.
One could argue that this adds to the experience!
> (These arguments would apply
> just as well if git picked Vim. vi is like
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:04 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> so the repo it's coming from is @commandline, but I am not doing
> it---somehow akmods pulls it in? my repolist is:
You probably have akmod-wireguard from rpmfusion-free.
___
devel
Congratulations to all of you, this is very useful and beautifully
made. I almost got a panic attack when I saw all the bugs, but I
quickly realized that most of them were for packages from groups I am
a member of. Everything is pretty self explanatory and in the long run
it is going to save us a l
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:00 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> I have deployed bodhi 5.4.0 (https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases)
> in production today. That should fix the issue with sidetags for normal
> releases :-)
Thank you!
I don't think I'll need to use sidetags until after the data
These updates, along with a couple of others I submitted 12h ago, just
appeared in my local mirror. Bodhi still shows everything as
transitioning from pending to testing and I never got a notification
about them having moved to testing. Side effect from the data center
move?
___
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:08 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
> > @fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
> > cha
I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
@fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
changed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:24 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:23:30AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but a
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:43 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> The other update doesn't seem to be moving, but at least
> it hasn't been ejected (yet).
And the second one was just cast out as well.
___
devel ma
Hello,
A few hours ago I submitted a couple of updates[0,1] that I had built
in side-tags. When I saw that after 7 hours they were still "pending"
I got in touch with infra on irc and Mohan gave them a push. I've just
received a notification that one of them was ejected from the push
because "None
Hello Greg,
I'll take it.
Could you please review this in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643
I'll start working on it in a few hours.
Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
So in a nutshell:
1. You've approached several FLOSS communities, even though you
clearly disagree with their core values.
2. You've complained/filed bugs for things you consider to be
problematic, stemming from the basic principles of said communities.
3. Members of these communities have explaine
See this thread from @legal:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JA4FEGORE53RXKOPRADODTBUCQN3XVJE/
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:53 PM Code Zombie wrote:
>
> Hi
> I recently realized that Windows WSL works by actually installing a Linux
> distribution. H
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 11:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:53:26PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > By default php-fpm is used for a few versions. mod_php is not
> > supported for threaded modules. mod_php usage also increases secu
Thanks Igor, I'll update both ASAP.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Gui
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite a while. I
> noticed a few of my packages still supply _smp_mflags manually.
Recently, one of my packages switched to meson and while searching
through our documentation, I
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:56 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> If we just make it an essay with suggestions of what to include, I think
>> it might be more engaging than just a sentence or two on specific
>> questions.
>>
> Thinking about it from a
Hello again,
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:02 PM Mark Pearson wrote:
>
>
> > From: Alexander Ploumistos
> > Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 8:07 AM
> >
> > One thing that I'd like to see, is linux support for the "energy
> > manager" features - it's
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:38 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020, at 8:07 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > One thing that I'd like to see, is linux support for the "energy
> > manager" features - it's pretty much the only reason I'
Hi Mark,
And welcome aboard.
I've been using a tweaked Legion Y520-15IKBN for a year and a half now
and I'm a happy camper. I can't say that I understand hardware
vendors' marketing decisions, like putting a heftier price tag on a
"professional" machine, whereas a "gaming" laptop with the same spe
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:05 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> Perhaps there are other reasons, like some third party software not
> working on F32, for example. I'm generally curious about how people
> actually use our distributions and what prevents them from just
> drinking from the firehose.
Well, sinc
And thank you for taking care of this.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Hi,
Almost a week ago, I built cmpfit and fityk in side tags on F31, F32
and F33. While the builds for F33 moved directly to stable - as
expected - the other two got stuck for 4 days. I noticed that I could
push them manually to testing, which I did a little over two days ago,
but they seem to be
Yesterday I had to use that functionality for the very first time and
with Mohan's comment in mind about the resource cost, I was leaning
towards using buildroot overrides. I ended up creating side tags, for
the simple reason that the available documentation was much more
clearer.
Are we supposed t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:55 AM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
> But from *where* do I download the ISO ?
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 08:46, wrote:
>>
[…]
>> You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
>> locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
>>
>> https://fedorapro
Here's mine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826326
I have to run a quick errand and afterwards I'll pick up the review
for freeopcua.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
Hello Till,
I've taken it, and a have a simple gnome-shell extension I would like
reviewed in return.
I'm currently working with upstream on a bug, once that's solved I'll
work on the freeopuca review.
Best regards,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:59 PM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> I view the rpmlint warning as a hint to try to get upstream to fix the
> license text. In the case of unresponsive upstreams, we just have to
> live with it.
I think we're all on the same page here, I made the suggestion bearing
in mind that
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:40 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:27:06PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > The FSF address should be the most straightforward to fix.
> >
> Straightforward, but impossible for a pacakger. Because it's a part of the
&
Hello again,
If nobody else steps up to do the review, I'll take care of it later
in the week.
In the meantime, see if you can resolve any of the issues picked up by
rpmlint - there may be some false positives there:
Rpmlint
---
Checking: gjots2-3.1.2-2.fc33.noarch.rpm
gjots2-3.1.2-
Hello Bob,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:12 AM Bob Hepple wrote:
> I'd like to unretire the package gjots2 package
> Full disclosure - I'm upstream. The package has been updated to python3
Since gjots2 had been orphaned quite some time ago, it will need to be
reviewed again:
https://fedoraproject.or
Hello Gonçalo,
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 9:13 PM Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira
wrote:
>
> One final question, I have managed to compile freehdl using a patch file from
> the maintainer of freehdl on Arch Linux repositories
> (https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/build-fix.pat
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:05 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18.02.2020 22:29, David Sommerseth wrote:
> > We released the OpenVPN 3 Linux v8 beta release early last week [0], with
> > the
> > Fedora Copr repository [1] updated as well. Now things are working so well
> > it
> > is abo
And now I am getting gpg key mismatches.
Should I just wait it out and keep resubmitting builds until they succeed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Hello,
I am trying to build a package in copr, but rawhide builds for
aarch64, ppc64le and x86_64 fail with the following message in
root.log:
DEBUG util.py:689: Executing command: ['btrfs', 'subv', 'list',
'/var/lib/mock'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh',
'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOS
Hello Bill,
And sorry for digressing.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 1:10 AM Bill Chatfield via devel
wrote:
>
> That's a very sad story. I had no idea. So it sounds like you mainly need
> maintainers for Java packages. I have worked on building RPMs but I have
> never been a package maintainer. Howe
Hello Ty,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 1:42 AM Ty Young wrote:
>
> The unfortunate reality is that none of what you describe will likely
> change in any significant way, at least not with the standard Linux
> distros(Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, Arch) etc. Too much of Linux is ideology
> based(GNU, among o
Hello Razer,
You've made quite some progress since the fork, well done!
I have come to rely heavily on mailnag and for a while now it seemed that
it was going the way of the dodo.
I could take up packaging, but for the time being I am in desperate need of
48-hour days and can't really add more to
You are welcome. Sorry for the HTML, I am away from home.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019, 15:12 Globe Trotter via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Thanks! There was an issue with koji and me. Now the update has been built
> and submitted for testing. Should I fix the egg issue? How.
> Thanks
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> Any further suggestion/help? Here is the updated spec file:
>
> $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec
> Uploading (5.0KiB)...
> https://paste.centos.org/view/3a4fe4d6
>
Oh, there's also a problem with your changelog entries, the last three
have
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
> Thanks! This seems to compile again, but I can't tell what happened with koji:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39956986
Besides koji misbehaving in general in the last few days, you have
uploaded an older s
101 - 200 of 474 matches
Mail list logo
