On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 18:30, Globe Trotter via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade from
> F37 and so I was wondering about it.
>
>
Hi,
I think the 9 is a red herring,
On (docker) Fedora 37
ain!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 01:17:56 PM CDT, Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 14:13, stan via devel
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 +000
l <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 + (UTC)
> > Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> >
> >> Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade
> >> from F37 and so I was wondering about it.
> &g
be
doing.
Thanks again!
On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 01:17:56 PM CDT, Stephen Smoogen
wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 14:13, stan via devel
wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 + (UTC)
> Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
>
>> Is texlive-was-9 retired fo
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 14:13, stan via devel
wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 + (UTC)
> Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
>
> > Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade
> > from F37 and so I was wondering about it.
>
> As near as I ca
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:30:28 + (UTC)
Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade
> from F37 and so I was wondering about it.
As near as I can tell, there is no package in fedora called
texlive-was-9.
There is a package
texliv
Is texlive-was-9 retired for Fedora 38? My package did not upgrade from F37 and
so I was wondering about it.
Thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code