On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 05:50:35 PDT Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Robin Burchell wrote:
> > To me, it's implicit that each release will ideally have improvements in
> > terms of stability, so I think that there's less point in focusing on
> > them, unless
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Robin Burchell
> Sent: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 3:02 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Please add [ChangeLog] entri
On Wed, May 31, 2017, at 02:50 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Robin Burchell wrote:
> > To me, it's implicit that each release will ideally have improvements in
> > terms of stability, so I think that there's less point in focusing on
> > them, unless
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Robin Burchell wrote:
> To me, it's implicit that each release will ideally have improvements in
> terms of stability, so I think that there's less point in focusing on
> them, unless they are a major newsworthy item: something like "sorry we
> released
My rule of thumb (when editing qtdeclarative's, for the last releases)
has been to include things depending on the "size" of the release. Small
(patch level) release? Include more bugs. Large (.0) release? Less focus
on bugs, more focus on architectural changes, feature additions, etc.
Any
> -Original Message-
> From: Mitch Curtis
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 3:27 PM
> To: Kai Koehne ; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: RE: Please add [ChangeLog] entries to your commits!
>
> > [...]
> > Please be reminded that all changes that might be of interest to
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Kai Koehne
> Sent: Monday, 29 May 2017 12:43 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Please add [ChangeLog] entries to your commit
Hi,
I just noticed that, out of the 61 commits in qtbase/5.9 that are not part of
5.9.0, only one has a [ChangeLog] entry.
Some of the commits are either changes to doc, or autotests, but for the rest:
If it is not important enough to be mentioned to the user, why is the change in
5.9?