I want to write a chat server. Using the programming language D.
(Dlang) It is desirable to use OOP.
My example.(Not working)
import std.stdio;
import std.concurrency;
import core.thread;
import std.conv;
import std.socket;
synchronized class DataInfo{
shared this()
{
}
public
Ensure yourself and your clients' information. Get it today to
comprehend compelling and effective
confirmation.https://www.courseworkempire.co.uk/
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)` be
welcome?
wouldn't that avoid all the complicatiosn with
version(StdUnittest) ?
eg use case:
# compile with unittests just for package foo (excluding
subpackage foo.bar) dmd
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 at 09:28:39 UTC, aliak wrote:
Does this maybe boil down to if two templates should be
covariant on their parameter types?
I'm not sure if this is always good. I haven't thought about it
deeply, but I assume that some templated functions should be
contravariant, and th
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 16:16:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 03/14/2018 01:01 AM, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 17:10:03 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
"Note that using row-major ordering may require more memory
and time than column-major ordering, because the routine must
transpos
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 12:45:24 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 05:01:38 UTC, 9il wrote:
Maybe we should use only column major order. --Ilya
In my head I had been thinking that the Mat type you want to
introduce would be just an alias to a 2-dimensional Slice with
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 17:10:03 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[1] mir-lapack uses Canonical slices in many of these
functions. I assume this is correct, but I have a nagging
feeling that I should compare the results of some of these
functions with another language to really convince
myself...When y
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:08:11AM +, Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
> > would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)` be
> > welcome? wouldn't that avoid all the complicatiosn with
> > version(StdUnittest) ?
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 00:37:39 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 00:16:05 UTC, Manu wrote:
Why does core.math exist? It's basically empty, but with a
couple of select functions which seem arbitrarily chosen...
Isn't core.math compiler intrinsics? The corresponding
funct
On 03/14/2018 02:33 AM, 9il wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 05:40:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'd like to understand why implement a distinct vector type, rather
than just a Nx1/1xN matrix?
This is just and API quesiton of how elements of Nx1/1xN matrix should
be accessed.
E.g. should one spec
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)` be
welcome?
wouldn't that avoid all the complicatiosn with
version(StdUnittest) ?
eg use case:
# compile with unittests just for package foo (excluding
subpackage foo.bar) dmd
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 23:30:55 UTC, Sam Potter wrote:
[snip]
OTOH, the fact that D doesn't have a REPL may kill it from the
get go (hard to do exploratory data analysis).
There is one in dlang-community (there might be others, can't
recall), but it does not yet support Windows and
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 00:16:05 UTC, Manu wrote:
Why does core.math exist? It's basically empty, but with a
couple of select functions which seem arbitrarily chosen...
Isn't core.math compiler intrinsics? The corresponding functions
in std.math call the core.math versions.
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 20:27:26 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/14/2018 03:51 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
contact [...] Stewart directly.
I think you mean Carl Sturtivant.
Oh.. yes, I’m sorry for such a gross misspelling.
Ali
On 14 March 2018 at 09:16, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 03/14/2018 01:01 AM, 9il wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 17:10:03 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>>>
>>> "Note that using row-major ordering may require more memory and time than
>>> column-major ordering, because the routi
Why does core.math exist? It's basically empty, but with a couple of
select functions which seem arbitrarily chosen...
> Even with DMD 2.079 the frame locals don't show up... LDC FTW!
confirmed, `fr v` shows frame locals for a binary built with ldc but not dmd
(independent of this PR though :) )
=> just submitted https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18612
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Luís Marques via Digi
> (BTW, if I commented out the plugin path setting I would get an assertion
> failure. Just FYI if that helps with the code review.)
fixed ; thanks for reporting!
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Luís Marques via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 14:00:39 UTC, Luís Marques wr
On 3/13/2018 4:19 AM, Chris wrote:
I will probably not be able to make it to DConf this year. But here are some
tips for those who are interested in history and / or sight-seeing:
Thank you, most appreciated!
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 22:17:49 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 20:21:15 UTC, Sam Potter wrote:
Sure. The key word in my statement was "ideally". :-)
For what it's worth, there is already an "informal spec" in
the form of the high-level interface for numerical linear
I originally proposed it here:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.3166.1517969180.9493.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
but it was buried under another thread
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
>
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 20:21:15 UTC, Sam Potter wrote:
Sure. The key word in my statement was "ideally". :-)
For what it's worth, there is already an "informal spec" in the
form of the high-level interface for numerical linear algebra
and sci. comp. that has been developed (over three
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)` be
welcome?
so when this came up on irc earlier (was that you?) this was the
first thought that came to my mind. I'd support it, tho I'm no
decision maker.
would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)` be welcome?
wouldn't that avoid all the complicatiosn with version(StdUnittest) ?
eg use case:
# compile with unittests just for package foo (excluding subpackage foo.bar)
dmd -unittest=foo -unittest=-foo.bar -i main.d
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 15:50:13 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
I've got a PR for dmd (https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7988)
that implements "interpolated strings" which makes generating
code with strings MUCH nicer, i.e.
Really nice. :thumbs-up:
On 03/14/2018 03:51 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
contact [...] Stewart directly.
I think you mean Carl Sturtivant.
Ali
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 17:36:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 17:22:16 UTC, Sam Potter wrote:
Ideally data structures and algorithms covering this would be
in the standard library?
I sure hope not. At least not for a long time anyway. It would
be hard to make an
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 15:50:13 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 at 13:50:28 UTC, Inquie wrote:
[...]
I've got a PR for dmd (https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7988)
that implements "interpolated strings" which makes generating
code with strings MUCH nicer, i.e.
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 17:22:16 UTC, Sam Potter wrote:
Ideally data structures and algorithms covering this would be
in the standard library?
I sure hope not. At least not for a long time anyway. It would be
hard to make any progress if it were in the standard library. At
this stage f
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 16:16:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Maybe we should use only column major order. --Ilya
Has row-major fallen into disuse?
Leaving aside interop between libraries and domains where row
major is often used (e.g. computer graphics), the issue is
semantic, I
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 16:16:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Has row-major fallen into disuse?
[snip]
C has always been row major and is not in disuse (the GSL library
has gsl_matrix and that is row-major). However, Fortran and many
linear algebra languages/frameworks have also al
On 03/14/2018 01:01 AM, 9il wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 17:10:03 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
"Note that using row-major ordering may require more memory and time
than column-major ordering, because the routine must transpose the
row-major order to the column-major order required by the underlyin
On Wednesday, 15 March 2017 at 13:50:28 UTC, Inquie wrote:
I hate building code strings for string mixins as it's very
ugly and seems like a complete hack.
How bout, instead, we have a special code string similar to a
multiline string that allows us to represent valid D code. The
compiler can
+1
An unfortunate thing with the bug report is that compact examples
tend to involve fairly dodgy looking assert(false) contracts -
which look and feel like "you're doing it wrong". BUT the issue
exists in realistic code, it just isn't as compactly demonstrable
:|
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 08:31:17 M.M. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 23:05:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 21:30:13 aberba via Digitalmars-d
> >
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > LOL. TDPL big? It's only 463 pages including the index. I have
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 05:01:38 UTC, 9il wrote:
Maybe we should use only column major order. --Ilya
In my head I had been thinking that the Mat type you want to
introduce would be just an alias to a 2-dimensional Slice with a
particular SliceKind and iterator. Am I right on that?
I
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 12:39:24 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Hi, folks!
I’m testing waters for a D course at one University for first
time it’ll be an optional thing. It’s still discussed but may
very well become a reality.
Thanks for the answers!
Answering some ideas:
- yes, TDPL mi
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 08:53:17 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 12:39:24 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
[...]
Hi Dmitry,
for presenting D to my team I used following example. It
highlights
some features of D: Meta programming, templates, CTFE, UFCS,
OOP in D,
Func
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 12:39:24 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Hi, folks!
I’m testing waters for a D course at one University for first
time it’ll be an optional thing. It’s still discussed but may
very well become a reality.
Before you ask - no, I’m not lecturing and in fact, I didn’t
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 at 23:05:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 21:30:13 aberba via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
LOL. TDPL big? It's only 463 pages including the index. I have
plenty of books that are double that size, if not larger.
Regardless, TDPL is an excell
On 2017-03-15 13:50:28 +, Inquie said:
I hate building code strings for string mixins as it's very ugly and
seems like a complete hack.
...
Even a bit old, I would like to pick-up this topic, as I totally agree
with the statement.
Thinking this a bit further, it would be very nice to h
41 matches
Mail list logo
