/uri.d
Thanks,
Mike van Dongen.
On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 at 07:38:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I would have expected a few additional components, like:
* Domain
* Password
* Username
* Host
* Hash
A way to build an URI base on the components.
It would be nice if there were methods for getting/setting the
path component
On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 at 20:36:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 at 19:54:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
A nitpick, I'm not really an expert on URI's but is "fragment"
really the correct name for that I would call the "hash"? That
would be "nose" in the example b
ocumentation :)
It's a dirty job, but someone's gotta do it ;)
I have commented all code that's not straightforward, but nothing
for the Ddoc.
Can you give me an example of how specific I need to be in the
documentation?
On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 at 19:54:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 25 October 2012 at 13:59:59 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
Just some small nit-picks.
That's what I was hoping for :D
in general checkout the Phobos style guide regarding function
names
etc.
http://dlang.org/dstyle.html
add some unittests.
Thanks! I haven't read that pag
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 11:52:09 UTC, John Chapman wrote:
Looks good.
Does it handle relative URIs? It would also be nice to support
combining URIs from an absolute and relative portion.
Another omission is handling file URIs.
It doesn't support relative URIs as their syntax is not
o
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 14:22:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 14:13:21 UTC, Mike van Dongen
wrote:
I am however considering it because even though not (clearly)
defined, they are URIs and they are often used.
The basedOn function in my uri struct in cgi.d does
Been thinking about this for a while now, but I can't decide
which one I should choose.
Currently there is a class URI which has an static method
(parser) which returns an instance of URI on success. On failure
it will return null.
I agree with Jens Mueller on the fact that URI should be a s
On Thursday, 8 November 2012 at 15:32:59 UTC, jerro wrote:
Something entirely else is the CTFE compatibility of URI. At
first I though that because a new instance of URI can be
created as a const, it would be evaluated on compile time.
This is part of how I test CTFE at the moment:
const URI u
On Thursday, 8 November 2012 at 17:02:25 UTC, jerro wrote:
Thnx. Got myself some new errors ;)
It seems that std.string.indexOf() does not work at compile
time. Is there a solution or alternative method for this?
I guess the proper solution would be to make std.string.indexOf
work at compile
eptable in
phobos?
On Thursday, 8 November 2012 at 15:10:18 UTC, Mike van Dongen
wrote:
I agree with Jens Mueller on the fact that URI should be a
struct instead of a class. But then I won't be able to return
null anymore so I should throw an exception when an invalid URI
has been passed to the constructor.
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 01:08:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Update - we've crossed $20K! At this point we're one major
backer away from achieving the goal, and we're looking at a
number of options. Please share with your friends and
coworkers, and bring the discussion up with your
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 01:08:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Update - we've crossed $20K! At this point we're one major
backer away from achieving the goal, and we're looking at a
number of options. Please share with your friends and
coworkers, and bring the discussion up with your
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 01:08:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Update - we've crossed $20K! At this point we're one major
backer away from achieving the goal, and we're looking at a
number of options. Please share with your friends and
coworkers, and bring the discussion up with your
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 01:08:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Update - we've crossed $20K! At this point we're one major
backer away from achieving the goal, and we're looking at a
number of options. Please share with your friends and
coworkers, and bring the discussion up with your
On Monday, 22 October 2012 at 17:25:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We're on! For one month starting today, we're raising funding
for DConf 2013.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2083649206/the-d-programming-language-conference-2013-0
Please pledge your support and encourage your friends
16 matches
Mail list logo
